Bart Stupak confirms …

Readability

Bart Stupak confirms ...

the Fish­bait Miller the­ory of Nancy Pelosi:

The Speaker always car­ries a num­ber of votes in her pocket,” he said, mean­ing that some mem­bers who voted ‘no’ would have voted ‘yes’ if needed.

I had a num­ber of mem­bers who thanked us after because they could vote no.”

I think we should fol­low Tom Blumer advice on this.

Well, okay Bart, who were these Dems who didn’t have the courage to vote their con­vic­tions, and instead wish to go back to their con­stituents and claim they didn’t sup­port the Oba­maCare mon­stros­ity? (crickets …)

Bet­ter yet, pal, don’t tell us. It would be much more con­ve­nient for Novem­ber vot­ers to pre­sump­tively assume that their no-​voting Demo­c­ra­tic con­gress­man really was a “yes” until Bart bailed them out. That works for me, and it would work for many other like-​minded Amer­i­cans — which is why the press will more than likely pre­tend that the CNA-​Stupak inter­view doesn’t exist.

Works for me.

the Fishbait Miller theory of Nancy Pelosi:

“The Speaker always carries a number of votes in her pocket,” he said, meaning that some members who voted ‘no’ would have voted ‘yes’ if needed.

“I had a number of members who thanked us after because they could vote no.”

I think we should follow Tom Blumer advice on this.

Well, okay Bart, who were these Dems who didn’t have the courage to vote their convictions, and instead wish to go back to their constituents and claim they didn’t support the ObamaCare monstrosity? (crickets …)

Better yet, pal, don’t tell us. It would be much more convenient for November voters to presumptively assume that their no-voting Democratic congressman really was a “yes” until Bart bailed them out. That works for me, and it would work for many other like-minded Americans — which is why the press will more than likely pretend that the CNA-Stupak interview doesn’t exist.

Works for me.