Not so fast on the Strauss Kahn bandwagon…

Readability

Not so fast on the Strauss Kahn bandwagon...

In the sud­den rush to beat col­lec­tive breasts con­cern­ing Dominique Strass Kahn as the prosecution’s lead wit­ness cred­i­bil­ity issues come to light there is some­thing every­one seems to have forgotten.

When this story first broke one of the first things that hap­pened was sev­eral women came out of the wood­work to talk about unwanted advances and more from Strauss Kahn over the years. Let’s remind you of one:

A local offi­cial of the Social­ist party claimed that Strauss-​Kahn had attacked her daugh­ter, who is god­daugh­ter to Strauss-Kahn’s sec­ond wife, in 2002.

Tris­tane Banon was in her 20s and writ­ing a book when she approached Strauss-​Kahn for an inter­view in 2002. In a TV pro­gramme in 2007, in which Strauss-Kahn’s name had been bleeped out, Banon allegedly described him as a “rut­ting chim­panzee” and described how she was forced to fight him off. “It fin­ished badly … very vio­lently … I kicked him,” Banon said. “When we were fight­ing, I men­tioned the word ‘rape’ to make him afraid, but it didn’t have any effect. I man­aged to get out.”

Banon con­sulted a lawyer, but did not press charges. “I didn’t want to be known to the end of my days as the girl who had a prob­lem with the politician.”

Banon’s mother, Anne Man­souret, told jour­nal­ists on Sun­day night she had dis­suaded her daugh­ter from legal action because she believed Strauss-Kahn’s behav­iour had been out of char­ac­ter and because of close links with his fam­ily. “Today I am sorry to have dis­cour­aged my daugh­ter from com­plain­ing. I bear a heavy responsibility,”

and lets remind you of another one:and another:

an indig­nant Nagy wrote to inves­ti­ga­tors say­ing: “I was not pre­pared for the advances of the IMF direc­tor gen­eral. I didn’t know what to do … I felt damned if I do, damned if I don’t.” Nagy left her job at the IMF after the affair, and hinted at harass­ment of female staff, adding that her boss had “with­out ques­tion” used his posi­tion to seduce her.

And lets not for­get the money:

They already talked with her fam­ily,” a French busi­ness­woman with close ties to Strauss-​Kahn and his fam­ily told The Post. “For sure, it’s going to end up on a quiet note.”

Pros­e­cu­tors in Man­hat­tan have done their best to keep the clean­ing woman out of the reach of Strauss-Kahn’s sup­port­ers, but the source was already pre­dict­ing suc­cess for the Parisian pol’s pals.

He’ll get out of it and will fly back to France. He won’t spend time in jail. The woman will get a lot of money,” said the source, adding that a seven-​figure sum has been bandied about.

Just a reminder the avg monthly income where she comes from in Africa is $45 a month

And lets not for­get that Kahn’s story went from “lunch with his daugh­ter” to “con­sen­sual sex” in record speed.

Peo­ple are already com­par­ing this to the Duke case but I don’t recall the duke guys hav­ing other women com­ing out with rev­e­la­tions, them chang­ing their story, or money chang­ing hands.

So I have three sim­ple ques­tions before I join the mea culpa bandwagon:

1. Have the women from the pre­vi­ous cases who “came out” recanted their stories?

2. Has any money changed hands or been promised to her fam­ily in Africa?

3. If the maid was mak­ing up the story all along, why did Strauss-​Kahn change his story about were he was?

I think these are good ques­tions, does any­one have good answers?

Update: It’s of course pos­si­ble that he could have been cho­sen for a scam because of what he was, but we’ll see.

In the sudden rush to beat collective breasts concerning Dominique Strass Kahn as the prosecution’s lead witness credibility issues come to light there is something everyone seems to have forgotten.

When this story first broke one of the first things that happened was several women came out of the woodwork to talk about unwanted advances and more from Strauss Kahn over the years. Let’s remind you of one:

A local official of the Socialist party claimed that Strauss-Kahn had attacked her daughter, who is goddaughter to Strauss-Kahn’s second wife, in 2002.

Tristane Banon was in her 20s and writing a book when she approached Strauss-Kahn for an interview in 2002. In a TV programme in 2007, in which Strauss-Kahn’s name had been bleeped out, Banon allegedly described him as a “rutting chimpanzee” and described how she was forced to fight him off. “It finished badly … very violently … I kicked him,” Banon said. “When we were fighting, I mentioned the word ‘rape’ to make him afraid, but it didn’t have any effect. I managed to get out.”

Banon consulted a lawyer, but did not press charges. “I didn’t want to be known to the end of my days as the girl who had a problem with the politician.”

Banon’s mother, Anne Mansouret, told journalists on Sunday night she had dissuaded her daughter from legal action because she believed Strauss-Kahn’s behaviour had been out of character and because of close links with his family. “Today I am sorry to have discouraged my daughter from complaining. I bear a heavy responsibility,”

and lets remind you of another one:and another:

an indignant Nagy wrote to investigators saying: “I was not prepared for the advances of the IMF director general. I didn’t know what to do … I felt damned if I do, damned if I don’t.” Nagy left her job at the IMF after the affair, and hinted at harassment of female staff, adding that her boss had “without question” used his position to seduce her.

And lets not forget the money:

“They already talked with her family,” a French businesswoman with close ties to Strauss-Kahn and his family told The Post. “For sure, it’s going to end up on a quiet note.”

Prosecutors in Manhattan have done their best to keep the cleaning woman out of the reach of Strauss-Kahn’s supporters, but the source was already predicting success for the Parisian pol’s pals.

“He’ll get out of it and will fly back to France. He won’t spend time in jail. The woman will get a lot of money,” said the source, adding that a seven-figure sum has been bandied about.

Just a reminder the avg monthly income where she comes from in Africa is $45 a month

And lets not forget that Kahn’s story went from “lunch with his daughter” to “consensual sex” in record speed.

People are already comparing this to the Duke case but I don’t recall the duke guys having other women coming out with revelations, them changing their story, or money changing hands.

So I have three simple questions before I join the mea culpa bandwagon:

1. Have the women from the previous cases who “came out” recanted their stories?

2. Has any money changed hands or been promised to her family in Africa?

3. If the maid was making up the story all along, why did Strauss-Kahn change his story about were he was?

I think these are good questions, does anyone have good answers?

Update: It’s of course possible that he could have been chosen for a scam because of what he was, but we’ll see.