Reg: What the point of fighting for his right to have babies when he can’t have babies?
Francis: It’s symbolic of our struggle against oppression.
Reg: It’s symbolic of his struggle against reality.
If you want to know what liberalism does this headline at the Boston Globe says it all:
Led by the child that simply knew
And this opening paragraph:
The twin boys were identical in every way but one. Wyatt was a girl to the core, and now lives as one, with the help of a brave, loving family and a path-breaking doctor’s care.
Brave is not the word for this, cowardly is.
If the kid likes girls things, that’s no big deal, if later in life he decides he is gay and prefers men later in life, that’s his business. If he chooses to cross dress that will be his business too.
But for parents and doctors and the Globe to celebrate the denial of reality, for parents to indulge their child to the point where they allow him to believe something that simply isn’t true is an abrogation of responsibility. Let’s tell a simple truth that apparently the Globe, the doctor and these parent are unaware of.
A child doesn’t know, a child wants. A parent knows and frankly should know better.
In the end this is a free country and this boy’s parents have every right to raise their sons any way they see fit. They have the right to spend as much of their money as they want on whatever kind of treatment they wish. What they don’t have is the right to impose this reality on others, but that is exactly what will happen.
I guarantee that any person who dares challenge their version of reality will be ostracized by the school, by the newspapers and by our liberal friends.
Well, ostracize me if you want, but I’m not playing along.
I’ll give the last word to the pythons: