Stop me before I have to vote!

by Datechguy | December 5th, 2012

Readability

Stop me before I have to vote!

There are two things that really don’t make any sense to me in the so-​called “Fis­cal Cliff” debate.

The first is the con­sid­ered opin­ion of every­one involved that “seques­tra­tion” is a bad thing when it was a bipar­ti­san law passed by a GOP House with broad demo­c­rat sup­port and through a demo­c­rat sen­ate with over half of the GOP sign­ing on then signed by the president.

But there is a sec­ond ques­tion that I found odd that isn’t get­ting a lot of play.

We are told by both sides that we have to do X because of the elec­tion. The left says the GOP has to give into the pres­i­dent because he won re-​election, the right says the pres­i­dent has to give some because the mem­bers of the House won re-​election and the sen­ate says noth­ing because they don’t want to remind peo­ple that Democ­rats have con­trol (and respon­si­bil­ity) for half of congress.

This makes no sense since the con­gress that WAS elected won’t be sworn in until Jan 3rd.

If we as a nation are going to make deci­sions, one way or the other, based on the elec­tion, why not sim­ply let the con­gress that is com­ing make these deci­sions? Let seques­tra­tion come, and then let the new con­gress do what they were hired to do when they were hired to do it.

And if we don’t like the job they do, well their con­tracts come up in two, four and six years.

There are two things that really don’t make any sense to me in the so-called “Fiscal Cliff” debate.

The first is the considered opinion of everyone involved that “sequestration” is a bad thing when it was a bipartisan law passed by a GOP House with broad democrat support and through a democrat senate with over half of the GOP signing on then signed by the president.

But there is a second question that I found odd that isn’t getting a lot of play.

We are told by both sides that we have to do X because of the election. The left says the GOP has to give into the president because he won re-election, the right says the president has to give some because the members of the House won re-election and the senate says nothing because they don’t want to remind people that Democrats have control (and responsibility) for half of congress.

This makes no sense since the congress that WAS elected won’t be sworn in until Jan 3rd.

If we as a nation are going to make decisions, one way or the other, based on the election, why not simply let the congress that is coming make these decisions? Let sequestration come, and then let the new congress do what they were hired to do when they were hired to do it.

And if we don’t like the job they do, well their contracts come up in two, four and six years.

Comments are closed.

Buy Raspberry Ketone Here

American 023

Try the Double Burger!

nashoba

Annie’s Book Stop of Worcester

Annies Book Stop of Worcester 001

Find Discounts at the Stores you Love

TOP STORES

Listen to your Granny

RWG

Forest of Assassins

Forest of Assassins

DH Gate Dot Com, Online Shopping

ecigarette

Support our favorite Charties

Read me at Examiner.com

Examiner badge2

Only 114 Million Hits to retirement!

Most Innovative Blogger 2013

Most Innovative Blogger 2013

Tags

Help a Brother Knight of Mine who needs a hand