Democrats and Dr. Stephens diagnosis

by Datechguy | December 26th, 2012

Readability

Democrats and Dr. Stephens diagnosis

Daras: The Deputy Führer is an author­ity on the genet­ics of racial purity. How do you clas­sify this one?

Melakon: [regard­ing Spock] Hm. Very dif­fi­cult. Note the sin­is­ter eyes… and the mal­formed ears. Def­i­nitely an infe­rior race.

Star Trek Pat­terns of Force 1968

“You shall not act dis­hon­estly in ren­der­ing judg­ment. Show nei­ther par­tial­ity to the weak nor def­er­ence to the mighty, but judge your fel­low men justly.

Leviti­cus 19:15


Our pro­gram­ming does not per­mit us to acknowl­edge that any crea­ture is supe­rior to the Daleks

Doc­tor Who: Gen­e­sis of the Daleks 1975

Pick­ing up from where I left off, when look­ing at some of the sto­ries that I didn’t bother to write about in the last few days I find there is a com­mon thread.

From the calls for death of Cli­mate “deniers” to NRA mem­bers to the “not to be taken seri­ously” assas­si­na­tion list of earth first includ­ing Bran­don Darby there is a sin­gle basic connection.

It is the idea that the peo­ple who are thus tar­geted or cri­tiqued are not wor­thy of the same cour­tesy and stan­dards of behav­ior that those mak­ing said dec­la­ra­tions would hold for themselves.

Thus any cri­tique par­tic­u­larly pub­lic cri­tique of Pro­fes­sor Erik Loomas is beyond the pale but Pro­fes­sor Loomas’ con­nect­ing Sarah Palin with the Gif­fords shoot­ing call­ing for the hunt­ing down of Dick Mor­ris to be skinned like a pig declar­ing for the world to see we need the heads on sticks of those who dis­agree is per­fectly accept­able no mat­ter what lan­guage he may employ or col­or­ful metaphors used.

Now while mem­bers of the tea party, the con­ser­v­a­tive blo­gos­phere and Repub­li­cans around the nation might object to this as a dou­ble stan­dard, we obvi­ously are for­get­ting that this type of think­ing from our demo­c­rat friends con­cern­ing Repub­li­cans is sim­ply an exten­sion of sci­ence:

Sci­en­tists have found that peo­ple with con­ser­v­a­tive views have brains with larger amyg­dalas, almond shaped areas in the cen­tre of the brain often asso­ci­ated with anx­i­ety and emotions.

On the oth­er­hand, they have a smaller ante­rior cin­gu­late, an area at the front of the brain asso­ci­ated with courage and look­ing on the bright side of life.

It’s the very same prin­ci­ple that another Demo­c­rat echoed describ­ing repub­li­can oppo­nents on another crit­i­cal mat­ter:

All fanati­cism springs from an aber­ra­tion of the mind from a defect in rea­son­ing. It is a species of insanity

Being fanat­ics with a species of insan­ity, we don’t under­stand why some­one like Bran­don Darby, who had the audac­ity to believe that bomb­ing the GOP con­ven­tion might not be the appro­pri­ate response to polit­i­cal dis­agree­ment, is clearly unwor­thy of stan­dards of soci­ety, let alone the con­sid­er­a­tion for his acts that an Erik Loomas should expect.

And we of the right like Darby, being unwor­thy of the con­sid­er­a­tion for the stan­dards or sup­port of soci­ety due to our men­tal impair­ment, dare I say men­tal infe­ri­or­ity why stop there? After all, if con­ser­vatism is a form of irra­tional insan­ity that as some say, has “blood on their hands”, what rights do con­ser­v­a­tives have that should be respected by he left and the media cul­ture that sup­port them, par­tic­u­larly if these opin­ions lead to the vio­lent death of women and children?

If such insan­ity could some­how be restrained, then the enlight­ened could solve prob­lems from the econ­omy to gun vio­lence unre­strained. There is a prece­dent. In fact there’s a whole Supreme Court rul­ing, one of the most famous rul­ings in Amer­i­can jurispru­dence, made by some of the most edu­cated and elite democ­rats of their time that can be looked to for guidance:

We think they are not, and that they are not included, and were not intended to be included, under the word “cit­i­zens” in the Con­sti­tu­tion, and can there­fore claim none of the rights and priv­i­leges which that instru­ment pro­vides for and secures to cit­i­zens of the United States.

I don’t see a sin­gle line in the con­sti­tu­tion pro­tect­ing the rights of the insane fanat­ics. Do you?

I know some might object to Democ­rats being con­nected these opin­ions of their party. Their resent­ment to some degree is proper, after all the left goes after the right irre­gard­less of race. So what is the actual dri­ver here? Well that’s for tomorrow.

Update: Stacy McCain notes some­thing at Occupy Rebel­lion that is rel­e­vant:

Andrew Bre­it­bart was a career crim­i­nal who made it his mis­sion to destroy peo­ple & their fam­i­lies.…
NO ONE linked to Bre­it­bart has the right to ever claim their “vic­tims” of any­thing. NO ONE linked to Bre­it­bart has the right to ever “grieve” for any­one they know who died.

Stacy is stuck by this:

What is strik­ing — and, in a weird ironic way, a trib­ute to Breitbart’s great­ness — is how this obses­sive hatred has per­sisted even after Breitbart’s death, so that now Rauhauser, “Occupy Rebel­lion” and oth­ers (most of them involved with the “Weiner Truther” cult) have trans­ferred their “heroic hatred” to Breitbart’s associates.

Stacy Stacy Stacy, you just don’t get it. It’s not obses­sive hatred, Bre­it­bart obvi­ously doesn’t have the right to be mourned because what he did and thought was obvi­ously, as Dr. Stephens would diag­nose, due to his insan­ity and any of us who wish to fol­low his exam­ple deserve no better.

Daras: The Deputy Fuhrer is an authority on the genetics of racial purity. How do you classify this one?

Melakon: [regarding Spock] Hm. Very difficult. Note the sinister eyes… and the malformed ears. Definitely an inferior race.

Star Trek Patterns of Force 1968

“You shall not act dishonestly in rendering judgment. Show neither partiality to the weak nor deference to the mighty, but judge your fellow men justly.

Leviticus 19:15


Our programming does not permit us to acknowledge that any creature is superior to the Daleks

Doctor Who: Genesis of the Daleks 1975

Picking up from where I left off, when looking at some of the stories that I didn’t bother to write about in the last few days I find there is a common thread.

From the calls for death of Climate “deniers” to NRA members to the “not to be taken seriously” assassination list of earth first including Brandon Darby there is a single basic connection.

It is the idea that the people who are thus targeted or critiqued are not worthy of the same courtesy and standards of behavior that those making said declarations would hold for themselves.

Thus any critique particularly public critique of Professor Erik Loomas is beyond the pale but Professor Loomas’ connecting Sarah Palin with the Giffords shooting calling for the hunting down of Dick Morris to be skinned like a pig declaring for the world to see we need the heads on sticks of those who disagree is perfectly acceptable no matter what language he may employ or colorful metaphors used.

Now while members of the tea party, the conservative blogosphere and Republicans around the nation might object to this as a double standard,   we obviously are forgetting that this type of thinking from our democrat friends concerning Republicans is simply an extension of  science:

Scientists have found that people with conservative views have brains with larger amygdalas, almond shaped areas in the centre of the brain often associated with anxiety and emotions.

On the otherhand, they have a smaller anterior cingulate, an area at the front of the brain associated with courage and looking on the bright side of life.

It’s the very same principle that another Democrat echoed describing republican opponents on another critical matter:

All fanaticism springs from an aberration of the mind from a defect in reasoning. It is a species of insanity

Being fanatics with a species of insanity,  we don’t understand why someone like Brandon Darby, who had the audacity to believe that bombing the GOP convention might not be the appropriate response to political disagreement, is clearly unworthy of standards of society, let alone the consideration   for his acts that an Erik Loomas should expect.

And we of the right like Darby, being unworthy of the consideration for the standards or support of society due to our mental impairment, dare I say mental inferiority why stop there?  After all, if conservatism is a form of irrational insanity that as some say, has “blood on their hands“,  what rights do conservatives have that should be respected by he left and the media culture that support them, particularly if these opinions lead to the violent death of women and children?

If such insanity could somehow be restrained, then the enlightened could solve problems from the economy to gun violence unrestrained.  There is a precedent.  In fact there’s a whole Supreme Court ruling, one of the most famous rulings in American jurisprudence, made by some of the most educated and elite democrats of their time that can be looked to for guidance:

We think they are not, and that they are not included, and were not intended to be included, under the word “citizens” in the Constitution, and can therefore claim none of the rights and privileges which that instrument provides for and secures to citizens of the United States.

I don’t see a single line in the constitution protecting the rights of the insane fanatics.  Do you?

I know some might object to Democrats being connected these opinions of their party.  Their resentment to some degree is proper, after all the left goes after the right irregardless of race.  So what is the actual driver here?  Well that’s for tomorrow.

Update: Stacy McCain notes something at Occupy Rebellion that is relevant:

Andrew Breitbart was a career criminal who made it his mission to destroy people & their families. . . .
NO ONE linked to Breitbart has the right to ever claim their “victims” of anything. NO ONE linked to Breitbart has the right to ever “grieve” for anyone they know who died.

Stacy is stuck by this:

What is striking — and, in a weird ironic way, a tribute to Breitbart’s greatness — is how this obsessive hatred has persisted even after Breitbart’s death, so that now Rauhauser, “Occupy Rebellion” and others (most of them involved with the “Weiner Truther” cult) have transferred their “heroic hatred” to Breitbart’s associates.

Stacy Stacy Stacy, you just don’t get it. It’s not obsessive hatred, Breitbart obviously doesn’t have the right to be mourned because what he did and thought was obviously, as Dr. Stephens would diagnose, due to his insanity and any of us who wish to follow his example deserve no better.

DaTechGuy on DaRadio Saturday Noon EST. WBNW AM 1120 Concord WPLM 1390 Plymouth, FTR Radio, the 405 Media

money matters 003

Last week:
Show 85: Live at the Natural Discount Shop Mary Lotz

Bonus Podcast from Natural discount shop

Next week Live from the Natural Discount Shop Rte 12 Leominster MA AGAIN

(Note Sept 6th & 13th LIVE from the Natural Discount Shop

Get Cash for Your Pallets! 1-(800) 248-7543

aaron test

jeffrey’s

jeffrey’s

Buy Raspberry Ketone Here

American 023

Belanger Hardware 284 Water St · Fitchburg · (978) 342-2912

belanger 2

Try the Double Burger!

nashoba

Annie’s Book Stop of Worcester

Annies Book Stop of Worcester 001

Find Discounts at the Stores you Love

TOP STORES

pottery paintin place

pottery paintin place

The Navy Seals in their First Mission

The Navy Seals in their First Mission

Get yours for Kindle Here

Get yours for Kindle Here

Listen to your Granny

RWG

DH Gate Dot Com, Online Shopping

ecigarette

Bernard PC 774-322-6045

Bernard PC 774-322-6045

Support our favorite Charties

Read me at Examiner.com

Examiner badge2

Only 114 Million Hits to retirement!

Most Innovative Blogger 2013

Most Innovative Blogger 2013

Tags

Help a Brother Knight of Mine who needs a hand