Cause and Effect: Gun Map edition

by Datechguy | January 19th, 2013

Readability

Cause and Effect: Gun Map edition

KIRK: You have to learn why things work on a starship.

Star Trek II The Wrath of Khan 1982

Bat­man: My mis­take was to try to Match is Sav­agery. To fight like a Young man.

Bat­man the Dark Night #2 1986

Hot wife in a bikini? #Winning!

Robert Stacy McCain Sept 14th 2012

The AP reports that the Jour­nal News has decided to take down its inter­ac­tive map of gun own­ers or rather dis­able it:

The maps remained online late Fri­day but could no longer be manip­u­lated to find names and addresses.

The story sug­gests the rea­son for the change is the new gun law in. I say BALDER­DASH!

When the Jour­nal News pub­lished its online map of gun own­ers and where they live, it pro­duced a firestorm of critique.

Pix­els poured out like water. Tele­vi­sion and Radio pushed the out­rage and the defense of the paper, James O’Keefe skew­ered them via Project Ver­i­tas, threats poured in to the point where the anti-​gun paper in a twist of Irony hired armed guards to pro­tect folks on their staff and it became the tar­get of the Blaze and the sub­ject of mul­ti­ple Drudge stories.

This is not a bug, it’s a fea­ture.

Obvi­ously the inter­ac­tive map was a web fea­ture alone. It likely took a fair amount of time and effort to put together and such effort is done on an online site for a rea­son. The rea­son is to gen­er­ate hits, and as the AP arti­cle notes:

She said the maps had been viewed nearly 1.2 mil­lion times since they were pub­lished Dec. 23.

Mis­sion Accomplished!

And not those 1.2 mil­lion hits were in under 30 days and that num­ber doesn’t include side hits to other sto­ries on the site gen­er­ated through those views. Blog­gers like myself dream of traf­fic at that level.

The value of an online site and the price of its adver­tis­ing is directly related to the num­ber of hits the site gets. The Jour­nal news may claim this map was all about jour­nal­is­tic dis­cre­tion and advanc­ing the story and dis­cus­sion, but when it comes down to it, that map was no dif­fer­ent than the first two para­graphs of this post from The Other McCain last year:

Traf­fic to the blog has got­ten a slight and unex­pected boost the past cou­ple of days because the entire world, it seems, is Googling for nude pho­tos of Kate Mid­dle­ton or rather top­less pho­tos of Kate Mid­dle­ton. Don’t bother click­ing those links, as they are merely a round-​trip ticket back to this post, part of Ye Merry Olde Google Bomb Trick.

Don­ald Dou­glas has a post clev­erly titled “Kate Mid­dle­ton Top­less” and our friendly Evil Blog­ger Lady offers ”Kate Mid­dle­ton top­less pho­tos? French mag­a­zine Closer pub­lishes them. Rule 5 Bri­tan­nia! Update: Reports of out­raged Brits storm­ing French embassy in protest!

As Robert Stacy con­stantly reminds us, he writes for money. The Jour­nal News does the same. That map was a google bomb directed at 2nd Amend­ment advo­cates nation­wide, a red cloth in front of a bull to make it charge. The Map fuels out­rage among gun advo­cates, out­rage fuels inter­est, inter­est cre­ates searches, searches mean clicks, clicks mean traf­fic, and traf­fic dic­tates what the Jour­nal News can charge for the ads that gen­er­ate the revenue.

That being the case, the map as a suc­cess­ful rev­enue gen­er­a­tor, why take it down? Why are we see­ing posts like this:

Glenn Reynolds 9:50 PM Jan­u­ary 18th EVENFLAT­WORM IS SMART ENOUGH TO TURN AWAY FROM PAIN: NY news­pa­per removes hand­gun per­mit holder data. Punch­ing the bully in the nose works.

It’s not punch­ing in the nose? You already had armed guards at homes and out­raged peo­ple who own deadly weapons and that didn’t get the inter­ac­tive map down. (BTW Guards not with­stand­ing, the will­ing­ness to out­rage those armed peo­ple tell you all you need to know about how much they actu­ally think those peo­ple were going to come to seek revenge)

Nearly a month of out­rage and debate didn’t pull down the map, if the inter­ac­tive map going away is the effect, what was the cause?

The answer is a sim­ple cost ben­e­fit analy­sis thus:

Glenn Reynolds 11:31 PM Jan­u­ary 17th I SMELLLAW­SUIT: Bur­glars steal two guns from home fea­tured on weapons per­mit map pub­lished by news­pa­per, just days after break-​in at another address on the list.

Law­suits cost money. All the out­rage, anger or poten­tial dan­ger for law-​abiding cit­i­zens in the world was going to move the Jour­nal News. The poten­tial of a law­suit turn­ing a source of profit into a loss, now That’s punch­ing back twice as hard.

So the inter­ac­tive map is gone hav­ing served it’s pur­pose, but the raw map will remain, still able to gen­er­ate hits for years to come and the Jour­nal News will slowly sink back into the level of obscu­rity it had before…

…until they find another red cloth to wave in front of an inter­net bull.

KIRK: You have to learn why things work on a starship.

Star Trek II The Wrath of Khan 1982

Batman: My mistake was to try to Match is Savagery. To fight like a Young man.

Batman the Dark Night #2 1986

Hot wife in a bikini? #Winning!

Robert Stacy McCain Sept 14th 2012

The AP reports that the Journal News has decided to take down its interactive map of gun owners or rather disable it:

The maps remained online late Friday but could no longer be manipulated to find names and addresses.

The story suggests the reason for the change is the new gun law in. I say BALDERDASH!

When the Journal News published its online map of gun owners and where they live, it produced a firestorm of critique.

Pixels poured out like water. Television and Radio pushed the outrage and the defense of the paper, James O’Keefe skewered them via Project Veritas, threats poured in to the point where the anti-gun paper in a twist of Irony hired armed guards to protect folks on their staff and it became the target of the Blaze and the subject of multiple Drudge stories.

This is not a bug, it’s a feature.

Obviously the interactive map was a web feature alone. It likely took a fair amount of time and effort to put together and such effort is done on an online site for a reason. The reason is to generate hits, and as the AP article notes:

She said the maps had been viewed nearly 1.2 million times since they were published Dec. 23.

Mission Accomplished!

And not those 1.2 million hits were in under 30 days and that number doesn’t include side hits to other stories on the site generated through those views. Bloggers like myself dream of traffic at that level.

The value of an online site and the price of its advertising is directly related to the number of hits the site gets.  The Journal news may claim this map was all about journalistic discretion and advancing the story and discussion, but when it comes down to it, that map was no different than the first two paragraphs of this post from The Other McCain last year:

Traffic to the blog has gotten a slight and unexpected boost the past couple of days because the entire world, it seems, is Googling for nude photos of Kate Middleton or rather topless photos of Kate Middleton. Don’t bother clicking those links, as they are merely a round-trip ticket back to this post, part of Ye Merry Olde Google Bomb Trick.

Donald Douglas has a post cleverly titled “Kate Middleton Topless” and our friendly Evil Blogger Lady offers ”Kate Middleton topless photos? French magazine Closer publishes them. Rule 5 Britannia! Update: Reports of outraged Brits storming French embassy in protest!

As Robert Stacy constantly reminds us,  he writes for money.  The Journal News does the same. That map was a google bomb directed at 2nd Amendment advocates nationwide, a red cloth in front of a bull to make it charge. The Map fuels outrage among gun advocates,  outrage fuels interest, interest creates searches, searches mean clicks, clicks mean traffic, and traffic dictates what the Journal News can charge for the ads that generate the revenue.

That being the case, the map as a successful revenue generator, why take it down? Why are we seeing posts like this:

Glenn Reynolds 9:50 PM January 18th EVEN A FLATWORM IS SMART ENOUGH TO TURN AWAY FROM PAIN: NY newspaper removes handgun permit holder data. Punching the bully in the nose works.

It’s not punching in the nose? You already had armed guards at homes and outraged people who own deadly weapons and that didn’t get the interactive map down. (BTW Guards not withstanding, the willingness to outrage those armed people tell you all you need to know about how much they actually think those people were going to come to seek revenge)

Nearly a month of outrage and debate didn’t pull down the map, if the interactive map going away is the effect, what was the cause?

The answer is a simple cost benefit analysis thus:

Glenn Reynolds 11:31 PM January 17th  I SMELL A LAWSUIT: Burglars steal two guns from home featured on weapons permit map published by newspaper, just days after break-in at another address on the list.

Lawsuits cost money. All the outrage, anger or potential danger for law-abiding citizens in the world was going to move the Journal News. The potential of a lawsuit turning a source of profit into a loss, now That’s punching back twice as hard.

So the interactive map is gone having served it’s purpose, but the raw map will remain, still able to generate hits for years to come and the Journal News will slowly sink back into the level of obscurity it had before…

…until they find another red cloth to wave in front of an internet bull.

Buy Raspberry Ketone Here

American 023

From a Former Atheist:

From a Former Atheist:

Try the Double Burger!

nashoba

Annie’s Book Stop of Worcester

Annies Book Stop of Worcester 001

Find Discounts at the Stores you Love

TOP STORES

Listen to your Granny

RWG

Forest of Assassins

Forest of Assassins

DH Gate Dot Com, Online Shopping

ecigarette

Support our favorite Charties

Read me at Examiner.com

Examiner badge2

Only 114 Million Hits to retirement!

Most Innovative Blogger 2013

Most Innovative Blogger 2013

Tags

Help a Brother Knight of Mine who needs a hand