The Common Thread of the Left: The Ultimate Target

by Datechguy | January 27th, 2013

Readability

The Common Thread of the Left: The Ultimate Target

“You shall not act dis­hon­estly in ren­der­ing judg­ment. Show nei­ther par­tial­ity to the weak nor def­er­ence to the mighty, but judge your fel­low men justly.

Leviti­cus 18:15

Woman, where are they? Has no one con­demned you?”

She replied, “No one, sir.” Then Jesus said, “Nei­ther do I con­demn you. Go, (and) from now on do not sin any more.

John 8:11 – 12

Our Con­sti­tu­tion was made only for a moral and reli­gious peo­ple. It is wholly inad­e­quate to the gov­ern­ment of any other.

John Adams

Father Damien Kar­ras: I think it might be help­ful if I gave you some back­ground on the dif­fer­ent per­son­al­i­ties Regan has man­i­fested. So far, I’d say there seem to be three. She’s convinced…

Father Mer­rin: There is only one.

The Exor­cist 1973

For quite a bit I’ve been writ­ing about a com­mon thread that we see on the left

I wrote about the media’s big lie con­cern­ing Hur­ri­cane Sandy

If George Bush was in office Ginny White would be on every TV net­work but this is the time of the Big Lie.

The Big Lie, it’s all about not telling the truth or “speak­ing truth to power” but about push­ing a meme and if some peo­ple are with­out blan­kets that’s just the way it is.

Susan Rice and Beng­hazi:

Note that the death of four Amer­i­cans is not the issue, the admin­is­tra­tion send­ing out a per­son before the elec­tion to deceive is not the issue, no it is the idea that two of the three Sen­a­tors who have cri­tiqued said per­son are white men (we’ll ignore female Sen­a­tor in the group) and she is a black woman and because she is a black woman the stan­dards of truth and hon­esty do not apply here.

Israel & Hamas:

So in pub­lic Israel needs to show restraint, in pri­vate Hamas and their rocket fir­ing friends are “some hooli­gans” than nor­mal peo­ple would just go kill?

I object to the use of the term “Hooli­gans” it’s not like they are a bunch of bik­ers drag­ging their mur­dered peo­ple behind them as they rideoh wait:

Islam:

Note that, not what is true, not what is right, what can be said.What can’t be said is any cri­tique of Islam, no mat­ter how true.

Amnesty Inter­na­tional:

Man­ag­ing that change has led to prob­lems – an indi­ca­tion of which emerged in 2009, when Amnesty handed over about 800,000 pounds ($1.2 mil­lion) to two for­mer exec­u­tives as part of a con­fi­den­tial pay­out upon departure.

Nor­mally one must speak truth to and about power, but if the group is a main­stay of the left appar­ently Silence is golden, par­tic­u­larly if it means sup­press­ing truth about an iconic left money machine.

Sen Kelly Ayotte again:

this is the left, if the truth and the real­ity is not favor­able we shall sim­ply ignore it, deny it or pre­tend it was never there.

On the bright side they can still play the race card if they include her.

Update: Jen­nifer Rubin appre­ci­ates Ayotte, but she is not the left.

Abor­tion:

Eliz­a­beth Eliz­a­beth Eliz­a­beth you are so close, being kind-​hearted you con­clude that Ms Williams is tak­ing her­self on a mon­strous route unknow­ingly, but observe her argu­ment care­fully. This is a place she has been for­ever, in fact an hon­est read­ing of her piece admits the pro-​abortion side has been there all along. The only rea­son she is mak­ing this state­ment in pub­lic is she believes it will advance her cause.

And the sanc­tity of life:

How many years do you think it will take before “So What” extends to other peo­ple who the left con­cludes are less impor­tant and less wor­thy of life?

How long before it becomes a mat­ter of faith that those who would stand up and object or obstruct such obvi­ous truths that are held by the more enlight­ened must be sup­pressed? Of course you’d have to dis­arm them first.

All these things have a com­mon thread, a pat­tern and it’s consistent:

1. Truth is not val­ued unless it serves a par­tic­u­lar ideology.

2. The real­ity of people’s state is sub­or­di­nate to the per­cep­tion of their actual condition.

3. Cri­tique can be made based on optics rather than fact.

4. Behav­iors that are con­sid­ered beyond the pale by their own stan­dards are tol­er­ated from spe­cific groups or people.

5. Pub­lic stan­dards only exist until they are no longer use­ful or needed in the fight.

Look­ing that this list, one might say, it’s a fight the laws of human nature, yet that is not entirely true, after all, if a per­son of the right has, say an affair, the left apply said rules to destroy them, as opposed to a Bill Clin­ton who is still celebrated.

Or one could say it’s a bat­tle for “mod­ern fem­i­nism” the right for women to advance, yet a Sarah Palin, Michelle Bach­mann, Nikki Haley or a Michelle Malkin can be pub­licly attacked in ways 1000 times beyond San­dra Fluke was, and the attack­ers are embraced and celebrated.

You might argue that its con­ser­v­a­tive val­ues that prompt the attack, which is why a Kelly Ayotte can be ignored, yet Islam is far more con­ser­v­a­tive and it is defended.

You could say open­ness and jus­tice are the goal, but such open­ness doesn’t extend to their own.

You can plead equal­ity for gays, yet the mur­der or beat­ing of gays in Islamic con­trolled lands is not an issue while Israel’s allow­ing of gay cul­ture to exist is “pink washing”

In short there appears to be a dou­ble stan­dard being employed here, peo­ple com­plain of it often, but that appear­ance is deceiv­ing. There is a sin­gle stan­dard being applied a com­mon thread a sin­gu­lar tar­get that must be destroyed:

That tar­get, Judeo-​Christian val­ues, or put sim­ply Chris­tian­ity.

Chris­tian­ity is every­thing the left despises:

It teaches the unity of men, when the power of the left comes from divid­ing by race or color or creed.

It acknowl­edges God as the source of our free­dom and free will, rather than the state or another giv­ing such freedom

It restrains appetites, greed (thou shalt not covet), lust ( thou shalt not com­mit adul­tery), spin (though shalt not bear false wit­ness) and does so by sim­ple rules, rather than let­ting one do what they want, when you want.

It for­gives and accepts any­one, on the con­di­tion that said per­son acknowl­edges and repents of their sins or at the very least com­mits to fight the temp­ta­tion to them.

It gives the absolute free­dom to walk away from it, while giv­ing you until the very last sec­ond of your life to re-​consider before actual judge­ment is passed.

And worst of all, to those who embrace it the strongest it gives courage, the courage to stand against any slan­der, any pres­sure and even die for the sake of Christ rather than sin.

Now some might look at this and scoff, there are Chris­tians with­out num­ber who vio­late these rules. Well YEAH of course they do, it’s sin, man is sus­cep­ti­ble to sin and temp­ta­tion yet Chris­tian­ity accepts them and dares to for­give them if only they change. Even the Pope has a confessor.

One might give numer­ous exam­ples of preach­ers and priests who have used Chris­tian­ity as a cloak for their own sins, YEAH of course but there are cor­rupt police, cor­rupt courts, cor­rupt politi­cians and dis­hon­est accoun­tants, that doesn’t mean we should abol­ish Police, Courts, Gov­ern­ment and Math.

One can point to the sins of a gov­ern­ment that pro­fesses Chris­tian­ity but even then Chris­tian­ity is a walk toward per­fec­tion, such per­fec­tion can’t be achieved on earth, the left con­stantly holds Chris­tian­ity to a utopian stan­dard that they promise but never deliver know­ing that very few if any indi­vid­ual Chris­tians reach that standard.

I can hear the argu­ments now: There are all kinds of Chris­tians that the left cel­e­brates, yes They are, from break­away Catholics to Protes­tants that aban­don the writ­ten faith the left is always ready to cel­e­brate any Chris­t­ian that is will­ing to walk away from the plain lan­guage of scrip­ture and tra­di­tion. And since any­one and pretty much make their own protes­tant church by a vote of a group of peo­ple how­ever small, there is no prob­lem find­ing the will­ing, par­tic­u­larly when fame and accep­tance from the right peo­ple is offered as a carrot.

Now I can hear those cry­ing: DaT­e­chGuy you’re full of it! It’s just a load of right wing non­sense you’re just upset because we are opposed to that wildly repres­sive orga­ni­za­tion known as the Roman Catholic Church that you fol­low.

That arrange­ment might hold weight if you didn’t con­sider the left and Islam.

Islam in gen­eral and rad­i­cal Islam in par­tic­u­lar is every­thing those who attack Chris­tian­ity in gen­eral and the Roman Catholic Church in par­tic­u­lar despise:

The left says Chris­tian­ity is misog­y­nis­tic point­ing to Paul words about sub­or­di­na­tion in verses 22 – 24 of Eph­esians (while con­ve­niently ignor­ing the rad­i­cal for the time ele­va­tion of women in verses 21, 25 – 33) yet ignore the open misog­yny when prac­ticed with­out vio­lence (divorce by sim­ple procla­ma­tion of a man, sub­or­di­na­tion in prac­tice, polygamy ), or with vio­lence (honor killing, jus­ti­fied rape or slav­ery of non-​believers)

They con­demn Chris­tian­ity as against homo­sex­ual acts (as indeed it is, just as Chris­tian­ity is against any other sin) yet the actual mur­der of Gays in Islamic lands or beat­ing of Gays even in West­ern coun­tries in Mus­lim enclaves are not news­wor­thy to them.

They abhor Chris­tian­ity com­plaints about the free expres­sion of things we find aber­rant or insult­ing to Christ (as is our right) in pub­lic or pri­vate dis­play to and roundly con­demn us a “puri­tan­i­cal” in defense of free speech.

Yet Molly Nor­ris is still in hid­ing for a car­toon, South Park’s Muham­mad episodes are still cen­sored, Chris­tians march­ing in Dear­born can be phys­i­cally stoned and a film­maker is still in prison over a (really lousy) film hit­ting Islam.

The ques­tion then is asked? Why isn’t Islam even cri­tiqued when Chris­tian­ity is tar­geted? The answer is sim­ple. Chris­tian­ity IS the tar­get thus the behav­iors of Islam are accept­able because it is dia­met­ri­cally opposed to Christianity.

But what about they Jews you might ask? Jews are no more Chris­tians than Hin­dus are. That’s true, but Judaism is the build­ing block that Chris­tian­ity is built upon. We wor­ship the same God, revere the same prophets and do our best to obey the same 10 com­mand­ments. One can describe the dif­fer­ence between Judaism and Chris­tian­ity in one sim­ple expression:

Jews and Chris­tians are run­ning the same race, but Jews think Chris­tians have jumped the gun, Chris­tians think Jews didn’t hear it go off.

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -

Now like any gen­er­al­ity there are excep­tions. Pat Cor­rell and the late Chris Hitchens come instantly to mind. They have no use for Chris­tian­ity but also have no use for Islam and at no lit­tle risk to them­selves loudly fought its Fas­cism. Like­wise my friend Cyn­thia Yockey might take an excep­tion to my argu­ments on the truth of Chris­tian­ity but she is an implaca­ble foe of Rad­i­cal Islam and has aban­doned the fis­cal lib­er­al­ism for the sake of her freedom.

It is no coin­ci­dence that all three of these peo­ple were rejected by the left for their apos­tasy although in fair­ness the left hasn’t yet reached the point where, like Islam such apos­tasy is pun­ish­able by death.

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

I ask you to look at the last 40 years. Look at where the cul­ture and the media has gone and ask your self, why? Ask why chil­dren three gen­er­a­tions removed from the cul­tural influ­ences of Chris­tian­ity find them­selves killing them­selves and oth­ers in num­bers not seen before? Ask why schools, par­tic­u­larly those con­trolled in places the left is strongest are places not of safety or edu­ca­tion but of dan­ger and medi­oc­rity. Ask why you have the most med­icated cul­ture in his­tory, the most liti­gious cul­ture in his­tory and a gen­er­a­tion that has phys­i­cal and mate­r­ial advan­tages that their grand­par­ents and great grand­par­ents could only dream of, can’t cope with life and despair of their future.

None of this is a bug, it’s all a fea­ture. Is this what you want for your chil­dren and grandchildren?

I’m quite sure that this argu­ment will pro­duce scoffs, insults, pejo­ra­tive labels and maybe even some counter argu­ments. That’s fine, the non­sense I can deal with and as for the argu­ments, if my the­sis is any good it will hold up under critique.

But what­ever you say, how­ever you phase it, if you look at the left and the path they have led our cul­ture I sub­mit and sug­gest there is one way to under­stand it:

The com­mon thread of the left is the destruc­tion of Judeo Chris­t­ian cul­ture, stan­dards belief and If you start from that posi­tion it all makes per­fect sense.

“You shall not act dishonestly in rendering judgment. Show neither partiality to the weak nor deference to the mighty, but judge your fellow men justly.

Leviticus 18:15

Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?”

She replied, “No one, sir.” Then Jesus said, “Neither do I condemn you. Go, (and) from now on do not sin any more.

John 8:11-12

Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.

John Adams

Father Damien Karras: I think it might be helpful if I gave you some background on the different personalities Regan has manifested. So far, I’d say there seem to be three. She’s convinced…

Father Merrin: There is only one.

The Exorcist 1973

For quite a bit I’ve been writing about a common thread that we see on the left

I wrote about the media’s big lie concerning Hurricane Sandy

If George Bush was in office Ginny White would be on every TV network but this is the time of the Big Lie.

The Big Lie, it’s all about not telling the truth or “speaking truth to power” but about pushing a meme and if some people are without blankets that’s just the way it is.

Susan Rice and Benghazi:

Note that the death of four Americans is not the issue, the administration sending out a person before the election to deceive is not the issue, no it is the idea that two of the three Senators who have critiqued said person are white men (we’ll ignore female Senator in the group) and she is a black woman and because she is a black woman the standards of truth and honesty do not apply here.

Israel & Hamas:

So in public Israel needs to show restraint, in private Hamas and their rocket firing friends are “some hooligans” than normal people would just go kill?

I object to the use of the term “Hooligans” it’s not like they are a bunch of bikers dragging their murdered people behind them as they rideoh wait:

Islam:

Note that, not what is true, not what is right, what can be said.What can’t be said is any critique of Islam, no matter how true.

Amnesty International:

Managing that change has led to problems – an indication of which emerged in 2009, when Amnesty handed over about 800,000 pounds ($1.2 million) to two former executives as part of a confidential payout upon departure.

Normally one must speak truth to and about power, but if the group is a mainstay of the left apparently Silence is golden, particularly if it means suppressing truth about an iconic left money machine.

Sen Kelly Ayotte again:

this is the left, if the truth and the reality is not favorable we shall simply ignore it, deny it or pretend it was never there.

On the bright side they can still play the race card if they include her.

Update: Jennifer Rubin appreciates Ayotte, but she is not the left.

Abortion:

Elizabeth Elizabeth Elizabeth you are so close, being kind-hearted you conclude that Ms Williams is taking herself on a monstrous route unknowingly, but observe her argument carefully. This is a place she has been forever, in fact an honest reading of her piece admits the pro-abortion side has been there all along. The only reason she is making this statement in public is she believes it will advance her cause.

And the sanctity of life:

How many years do you think it will take before “So What” extends to other people who the left concludes are less important and less worthy of life?

How long before it becomes a matter of faith that those who would stand up and object or obstruct such obvious truths that are held by the more enlightened must be suppressed? Of course you’d have to disarm them first.

All these things have a common thread, a pattern and it’s consistent:

1. Truth is not valued unless it serves a particular ideology.

2. The reality of people’s state is subordinate to the perception of their actual condition.

3. Critique can be made based on optics rather than fact.

4. Behaviors that are considered beyond the pale by their own standards are tolerated from specific groups or people.

5.  Public standards only exist until they are no longer useful or needed in the fight.

Looking that this list, one might say, it’s a fight the laws of human nature, yet that is not entirely true, after all, if a person of the right has, say an affair, the left apply said rules to destroy them, as opposed to a Bill Clinton who is still celebrated.

Or one could say it’s a battle for “modern feminism” the right for women to advance, yet a Sarah Palin,  Michelle Bachmann, Nikki Haley or a Michelle Malkin can be publicly attacked in ways 1000 times beyond Sandra Fluke was,  and the attackers are embraced and celebrated.

You might argue that its conservative values that prompt the attack, which is why a Kelly Ayotte can be ignored, yet Islam is far more conservative and it is defended.

You could say openness and justice are the goal, but such openness doesn’t extend to their own.

You can plead equality for gays, yet the murder or beating of gays in Islamic controlled lands is not an issue while Israel’s allowing of gay culture to exist is “pink washing”

In short there appears to be a double standard being employed here, people complain of it often, but that appearance is deceiving.  There is a single standard being applied a common thread a singular target that must be destroyed:

That target, Judeo-Christian values, or put simply Christianity.

Christianity is everything the left despises:

It teaches the unity of men, when the power of the left comes from dividing by race or color or creed.

It acknowledges God as the source of our freedom and free will, rather than the state or another giving such freedom

It restrains appetites, greed (thou shalt not covet), lust ( thou shalt not commit adultery), spin (though shalt not bear false witness) and does so by simple rules, rather than letting one do what they want, when you want.

It forgives and accepts anyone, on the condition that said person acknowledges and repents of their sins or at the very least commits to fight the temptation to them.

It gives the absolute freedom to walk away from it, while giving you until the very last second of your life to re-consider before actual judgement is passed.

And worst of all, to those who embrace it the strongest it gives courage, the courage to stand against any slander, any pressure and even die for the sake of Christ rather than sin.

Now some might look at this and scoff, there are Christians without number who violate these rules.  Well YEAH of course they do, it’s sin, man is susceptible to sin and temptation yet Christianity accepts them and dares to forgive them if only they change.  Even the Pope has a confessor.

One might give numerous examples of preachers and priests who have used Christianity as a cloak for their own sins, YEAH of course but there are corrupt police, corrupt courts, corrupt politicians and dishonest accountants, that doesn’t mean we should abolish Police, Courts, Government and Math.

One can point to the sins of a government that professes Christianity but even then Christianity is a walk toward perfection, such perfection can’t be achieved on earth, the left constantly holds Christianity to a utopian standard that they promise but never deliver knowing that very few if any individual Christians reach that standard.

I can hear the arguments now:  There are all kinds of Christians that the left celebrates, yes They are, from breakaway Catholics to Protestants that abandon the written faith the left is always ready to celebrate any Christian that is willing to walk away from the plain language of scripture and tradition.  And since anyone and pretty much make their own protestant church by a vote of a group of people however small, there is no problem finding the willing, particularly when fame and acceptance from the right people is offered as a carrot.

Now I can hear those crying:  DaTechGuy you’re full of it!  It’s just a load of right wing nonsense you’re just upset because we are opposed to that wildly repressive organization known as the Roman Catholic Church that you follow.

That arrangement might hold weight if you didn’t consider the left and Islam.

Islam in general and radical Islam in particular is everything those who attack  Christianity in general and the Roman Catholic Church in particular despise:

The left says Christianity is misogynistic pointing to Paul words about subordination in verses 22-24 of Ephesians (while conveniently ignoring the radical for the time elevation of women in verses 21, 25-33) yet ignore the open misogyny when practiced without violence (divorce by simple proclamation of a man, subordination in practice, polygamy ), or with violence (honor killing, justified rape or slavery of non-believers)

They condemn Christianity as against homosexual acts  (as indeed it is, just as Christianity is against any other sin) yet the actual murder of Gays in Islamic lands or beating of Gays even in Western countries in Muslim enclaves are not newsworthy to them.

They abhor Christianity complaints about the free expression of things we find aberrant or insulting to Christ (as is our right) in public or private display to  and roundly condemn us a “puritanical” in defense of free speech.

Yet Molly Norris is still in hiding for a cartoon, South Park’s Muhammad episodes are still censored, Christians marching in Dearborn can be physically stoned and a filmmaker is still in prison over a (really lousy) film hitting Islam.

The question then is asked?  Why isn’t Islam even critiqued when Christianity is targeted?  The answer is simple.  Christianity IS the target thus the behaviors of Islam are acceptable because it is diametrically opposed to Christianity.

But what about they Jews you might ask?  Jews are no more Christians than Hindus are.  That’s true, but Judaism is the building block that Christianity is built upon.  We worship the same God, revere the same prophets and do our best to obey the same 10 commandments.  One can describe the difference between Judaism and Christianity in one simple expression:

Jews and Christians are running the same race, but Jews think Christians have jumped the gun, Christians think Jews didn’t hear it go off.

—————————————————————-

Now like any generality there are exceptions.   Pat Correll and the late Chris Hitchens come instantly to mind.  They have no use for Christianity but also have no use for Islam and at no little risk to themselves loudly fought its Fascism.  Likewise my friend Cynthia Yockey might take an exception to my arguments on the truth of Christianity but she is an implacable foe of Radical Islam and has abandoned the fiscal liberalism for the sake of her freedom.

It is no coincidence that all three of these people were rejected by the left for their apostasy although in fairness the left hasn’t yet reached the point where, like Islam such apostasy is punishable by death.

—————————————————————

I ask you to look at the last 40 years.  Look at where the culture and the media has gone and ask your self, why?  Ask why children three generations removed from the cultural influences of Christianity find themselves killing themselves and others in numbers not seen before?  Ask why schools, particularly those controlled in places the left is strongest are places not of safety or education but of danger and mediocrity.  Ask why you have the most medicated culture in history, the most litigious culture in history and a generation that has physical and material advantages that their grandparents and great grandparents could only dream of, can’t cope with life and despair of their future.

None of this is a bug, it’s all a feature.  Is this what you want for your children and grandchildren?

I’m quite sure that this argument will produce scoffs, insults, pejorative labels and maybe even some counter arguments.  That’s fine, the nonsense I can deal with and as for the arguments,  if my thesis is any good it will hold up under critique.

But whatever you say, however you phase it, if you look at the left and the path they have led our culture I submit and suggest there is one way to understand it:

The common thread of the left is the destruction of Judeo Christian culture, standards belief and If you start from that position it all makes perfect sense.

Buy Raspberry Ketone Here

American 023

Try the Double Burger!

nashoba

Annie’s Book Stop of Worcester

Annies Book Stop of Worcester 001

Find Discounts at the Stores you Love

TOP STORES

Listen to your Granny

RWG

Forest of Assassins

Forest of Assassins

DH Gate Dot Com, Online Shopping

ecigarette

Support our favorite Charties

Read me at Examiner.com

Examiner badge2

Only 114 Million Hits to retirement!

Most Innovative Blogger 2013

Most Innovative Blogger 2013

Tags

Help a Brother Knight of Mine who needs a hand