How's that women-empowering sexual revolution thing working out for you?

From the U.K. Tele­graph:

A friend’s daugh­ter recently started at a highly regarded board­ing school. When her mother asked how she was enjoy­ing the mixed-​sex envi­ron­ment, the girl said qui­etly: “You have to give the boys oral sex or they get cross.” Reel­ing with shock, the mum protested that her dar­ling daugh­ter did not have to do any­thing of the sort. “Oh yes you do,” replied the girl. “And you have to shave down there or the boys don’t like it.”

That’s just a sam­ple. There’s also:

Only last week, we heard the awful story of Chevonea Kendall-​Bryan, who fell to her death after plead­ing with a boy on the pave­ment below to erase the record­ing of her per­form­ing a sex act on him. “How much can I han­dle? HON­ESTLY. I beg you, delete that,” texted Chevonea. She was 13.

The author of this arti­cle, Alli­son Pear­son, talks a lot about the porn cul­ture and the ready access to a “vir­tual world” (online, tex­ting, etc.). But she misses the point. We could have thrown mobile phones at women in the 1860s, but no man would have dared to ask a lady to per­form fel­la­tio on him, because her dad would shoot him. As in, dual to the death, all mem­bers of her fam­ily lined up to protest the treat­ment of their sis­ter. (I will note that some very back­wards coun­tries shoot the wronged woman, not the offend­ing man.)

This is a sex­ual rev­o­lu­tion issue. Once we started say­ing that promis­cu­ity is empow­er­ing, that sex­ual exper­i­men­ta­tion is fun for women, that preg­nancy is the only obsta­cle a woman faces in inti­mate acts, we gave young men license to treat young women like unpaid pros­ti­tutes. (Actu­ally, worse — a man might under­stand if a pros­ti­tute said that she was off-​duty for the night.)

The lead­ers of the sex­ual rev­o­lu­tion — courted by men brought up with dif­fer­ent stan­dards than the ones espoused by the likes of Steinem — had it good. But their legacy to my gen­er­a­tion, and the gen­er­a­tion behind me, is men brought up to believe that only a repressed woman does not put out, that sex is their right, and that there is noth­ing emo­tional that hap­pens to a woman when she per­forms inti­mate (and some­times quite vul­gar and undig­ni­fied) sex acts on men who are not her hus­band. The log­i­cal result, no mat­ter what the inten­tions of these Baby Boomer women were, is that men feel it is their nat­ural right to sex­u­ally exploit all women.

Nice going, “fem­i­nists”. Nice going.