ReadabilitySeparate but equal lives in Colorado
In Colorado apparently the after school tutoring program for kids is for children of color only:
A school principal said no white children were allowed at an after-school tutoring program, and now some parents call it discrimination.
The principal at Mission Viejo Elementary in Aurora sent a letter telling parents the program is only for students of color.
Not to worry the school says they will make accommodation for the rare white student who like students of color fail to reach the levels of accomplishment that students of the school are expected to reach.
“This is Andre Pearson. It’s focused for and designed for children of color, but certainly, if we have space for other kids who have needs, we can definitely meet those needs,”
Now some might suggest such an arrangement suggests an inherent inferiority in non-white students, particularly if they need help devoid of the presence of a different race, but the school disagrees:
If the civil and political rights of both races be equal, one cannot be inferior to the other civilly or politically.
and further
We consider the underlying fallacy of the plaintiff’s argument to consist in the assumption that the enforced separation of the two races stamps the colored race with a badge of inferiority. If this be so, it is not by reason of anything found in the act, but solely because the colored race chooses to put that construction upon it.
Oh sorry, my mistake, that’s not the schools argument that’s from the majority opinion of the Supreme Court Case Plessy v. Ferguson of 1896.
Funny I seem to recall a court case in 1954 overturning that decision saying in part:
We conclude that in the field of public education the doctrine of “separate but equal” has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.
One would think that a school principal would be familiar with this but perhaps Mr. Pearson can be tutored on the subject. The only question: Will he demand a segregated tutoring session.
In Colorado apparently the after school tutoring program for kids is for children of color only:
A school principal said no white children were allowed at an after-school tutoring program, and now some parents call it discrimination.
The principal at Mission Viejo Elementary in Aurora sent a letter telling parents the program is only for students of color.
Not to worry the school says they will make accommodation for the rare white student who like students of color fail to reach the levels of accomplishment that students of the school are expected to reach.
“This is Andre Pearson. It’s focused for and designed for children of color, but certainly, if we have space for other kids who have needs, we can definitely meet those needs,”
Now some might suggest such an arrangement suggests an inherent inferiority in non-white students, particularly if they need help devoid of the presence of a different race, but the school disagrees:
If the civil and political rights of both races be equal, one cannot be inferior to the other civilly or politically.
and further
We consider the underlying fallacy of the plaintiff’s argument to consist in the assumption that the enforced separation of the two races stamps the colored race with a badge of inferiority. If this be so, it is not by reason of anything found in the act, but solely because the colored race chooses to put that construction upon it.
Oh sorry, my mistake, that’s not the schools argument that’s from the majority opinion of the Supreme Court Case Plessy v. Ferguson of 1896.
Funny I seem to recall a court case in 1954 overturning that decision saying in part:
We conclude that in the field of public education the doctrine of “separate but equal” has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.
One would think that a school principal would be familiar with this but perhaps Mr. Pearson can be tutored on the subject. The only question: Will he demand a segregated tutoring session.
[...] Viejo Elementary school in Colorado, at the direction of similar school busybodies: Children were not allowed at an after-school tutoring program because they weren’t the right race. That the school [...]
This is a great event for pointing out the inherent discrimination and reverse-racism of our system, but, honestly, white parents, if you want a good tutoring experience for your child, you don’t want them in with a bunch of black kids.
I disagree, Cloudbuster. By definition any student requiring tutoring is behind so there is no reason to believe that any particular student is going to hold back other in a tutoring session. If your objection is cultural, you are talking 10 year olds, this isn’t a “gang” situation where a clash of culture might exist.
And either way in a public school if a person is causing trouble it is incumbent on the teacher to take care of it. Either we are going to have interrelation in public schools or we are not.
[...] More from DaTechGuy: Separate but equal lives in Colorado [...]
One would think that a school principal would be familiar with this but perhaps Mr. Pearson can be tutored on the subject.
Only if Mr. Pearson is a school principal of color.
Defund these indoctrination centers and break the unions who control them
[...] IN COLORADO, separate-but-equal education survives. [...]
There is a move afoot among the Progs to claim that only black teachers should teach black students. See National Black Parents Association; The Root; The Root
[...] This revival of public-school segregation — unexpectedly! — caused Pete Da Tech Guy to notice that Aurora school policy sounded oddly familiar: [...]