The Right should buy the Boston Globe…and staff it with conservatives

by Datechguy | February 23rd, 2013

Readability

The Right should buy the Boston Globe...and staff it with conservatives

There has been a lot of talk about what con­ser­v­a­tives need to do in order to get their mes­sage out to the low infor­ma­tion voter. These are the vot­ers who don’t pay atten­tion to the news, don’t watch cable or read blogs much but do read gen­eral mag­a­zines while wait­ing at the doc­tor, who do hear CNN in the back­ground in air­ports or at their local bar and restaurant.

The prob­lem is those back­ground noises are filled with lib­eral pap as I explained a while back:

In the end after dur­ing tes­ti­mony over fidelity and “Free Fri­days” the judge (Bebe Neuwirth) rules that DOMA is the law of the land and the wire­taps can be played. Of course con­sid­er­ing her argu­ment the entire sequence ask­ing for evi­dence is mean­ing­less, but the point was to argue the unfair­ness of DOMA to the view­ing audi­ence not to make a real­is­tic court drama.

So the point is made Vio­lins play and the audi­ence is shown just how HOR­RI­BLE DOMA is. The lib­eral writ­ers had done their work.

And that is what we are fight­ing against 100 times a week on Net­work TV.

Glenn Reynolds has sug­gested con­ser­v­a­tives instead of shov­el­ing money toward con­sul­tants buy some women’s mag­a­zines

There’s noth­ing new about this, of course. In her 2004 book, “Spin Sis­ters: How the Women of The Media Sell Unhap­pi­ness — and Lib­er­al­ism — to the Women of Amer­ica,” Myrna Blyth (a for­mer Ladies Home Jour­nal edi­tor) explained in con­sid­er­able detail the vari­ety of “Mean Girls” fem­i­nism that the women’s media aim at their read­ers with every issue.

The mes­sage: There’s one way that women should think; peo­ple who don’t think that way are bad and stu­pid — and if you think the wrong way, women won’t like you.

For $150 mil­lion, you could buy or start a lot of women’s Web sites. And I’d hardly change a thing in the for­mula. The nine arti­cles on sex, shop­ping and exer­cise could stay the same. The 10th would just be the reverse of what’s there now.

And THAT’s why con­ser­v­a­tives should con­sider pur­chas­ing the Boston Globe.

I can hear the cries now, Print is Dead The Unions are costly, the pen­sion bur­den is huge. Michael Gra­ham sit­ting in the very stu­dio I’m sit­ing in as this goes on the web asked who in their right minds would buy the Boston Globe? All true and if you were buy­ing the Globe with the goal of turn­ing a profit I’d quite agree, but con­sider for a moment these words from Robert Stacy McCain (empha­sis mine)

con­sider how rich lib­er­als are will­ing to act as “angels” toward their media pets. I made this point yes­ter­day in regard to Tina Brown, who lost $80 mil­lion dur­ing two years as edi­tor of Talk, after los­ing $40 mil­lion dur­ing a three-​year period as edi­tor of The New Yorker, and who has most recently pushed back the goal­posts of pro­jected prof­itabil­ity at the Daily Beast to some­where between (a) three years and (b) when hell freezes over.
Does it not occur to you, my clever read­ers, that these are not merely busi­ness losses, but are in fact a sort of char­i­ta­ble endeavor to sup­port the prop­a­ga­tion of fash­ion­able liberalism?

Shel­don Adel­son & Fos­ter Friees put a lot of money into Newt Gin­grich & Rick San­to­rum both strong con­ser­v­a­tive voices but con­sider what would hap­pen if they put it into the Iconic name of the Boston Globe.

First of all story selec­tion. If you search for Jen­nifer Morbelli’s in the Boston Globe this is what you get:

globe

You would think the death of a 29-​year-​old woman from a botched abor­tion in her 33rd week of preg­nancy might be news­wor­thy, par­tic­u­larly if the abo­li­tion­ist in ques­tion was cel­e­brated by the media elites at the Sun­dance film fes­ti­val. It might even elicit some out­rage, but not if the hun­dreds of thou­sands of vis­i­tors to the site or read­ers of the print edi­tion never see it. As far as they are con­cerned it never happened.

Some­thing along a dif­fer­ent vein from John Hin­der­aker per­haps:

there is a huge scan­dal in the field of energy: the Obama administration’s slid­ing tens of bil­lions of dol­lars to Demo­c­ra­tic Party cronies in the “green energy” indus­try to sup­port goofy projects that couldn’t exist with­out gov­ern­ment favoritism. This is a real scan­dal, with real crony­ism and real cor­rup­tion, involv­ing enor­mous amounts of money. Yet the media sim­ply ignore it, because report­ing on it would reflect badly on their party.

The reac­tion of Globe read­ers? What Scan­dal? Hin­der­aker again:

The lib­eral media man­i­fest their bias not pri­mar­ily by writ­ing things that aren’t true – although that some­times hap­pens – but rather, by select­ing what they do and do not report as news. Major scan­dals and events of great impor­tance are sim­ply ignored if they do not reflect well on the Demo­c­ra­tic Party

And that’s just the NEWS sto­ries, con­sider the following:

  • Imag­ine a Movie sec­tion where the lib­eral themes of a pic­ture were noted and tweaked while the con­ser­v­a­tive themes were high­lighted and celebrated.
  • Imag­ine a cul­ture sec­tion where events of a con­ser­v­a­tive nature were cel­e­brated while lib­er­als pressed to get the press.
  • Imag­ine reviews of plays with con­ser­v­a­tive themes get­ting web space and print space and lib­eral themes hop­ing for a line or two.
  • Imag­ine sto­ries in the Sun­day sec­tion cel­e­brat­ing his­toric places, peo­ple and sites that high­light America’s con­ser­v­a­tive His­tory or peo­ple who are con­ser­v­a­tive doing great things for the community.
  • Imag­ine a whole slew of con­ser­v­a­tive Jour­nal­ists cut­ting their teeth of straight news instead of news with a lib­eral spin, imag­ine the farm team it would create.
  • Imag­ine an edi­to­r­ial page giv­ing con­ser­v­a­tive opin­ion day after day after day.
  • And imag­ine a web site ranked in the top 1500 world­wide and top 350 nation­ally, a web site that local papers around New Eng­land draw sto­ries from giv­ing that pub­lic con­ser­v­a­tive thought as back­ground noise in the same way that lib­er­als have done for ages.
  • And of course a con­ser­v­a­tive would also imple­ment con­ser­v­a­tive busi­ness tac­tics in an attempt to actu­ally turn the enter­prise into a profit cen­ter rather than a loss leader.

    To the left the Boston Globe is just one more voice in their cacoph­ony of voices they own. But to Con­ser­v­a­tives it is the entrée to the entire New Eng­land Conversation.

    If the goal is to weaken the left it’s a no lose propo­si­tion. If con­ser­v­a­tive make an offer for the Globe and win, it can become a model of what a Con­ser­v­a­tive Paper should be and a vehi­cle for the report­ing the sto­ries of all type the MSM leaves behind and begin the process that Glenn Reynolds suggested.

    And at the very worst if the New York Times either refuses to sell or a Soros type jumps in will Hun­dreds of mil­lions to keep the paper out of con­ser­v­a­tive hands. We get the plea­sure of see­ing lib­er­als spend­ing a for­tune just for the priv­i­lege of los­ing money hand over fist to sup­port their unions just to keep what they already have.

    Think about it.

    Update: Extra R in John’s name, cor­rected, thanks Glenn.

    *************************************************

    [ther­mome­ter raised=154 target=300 height =200 ]

    The Good news is yes­ter­day we passed the half way mark in my weekly pay­check goal.

    The Bad news is I’m still $146 short of that $300 week paycheck.

    $146 dol­lars is 7 peo­ple kick­ing in $20. Like Yul Brenner’s Char­ac­ter Chris I’m look­ing for that Mag­nif­i­cent Seven in that crowd of thou­sands of vis­i­tors. To quote Charles Bronson;s character:

    $20? Right now that’s a lot!

    Update: The mag­nif­i­cent seven was the Mag­nif­i­cent two but the result was the same, thanks





    There has been a lot of talk about what conservatives need to do in order to get their message out to the low information voter. These are the voters who don’t pay attention to the news, don’t watch cable or read blogs much but do read general magazines while waiting at the doctor, who do hear CNN in the background in airports or at their local bar and restaurant.

    The problem is those background noises are filled with liberal pap as I explained a while back:

    In the end after during testimony over fidelity and “Free Fridays” the judge (Bebe Neuwirth) rules that DOMA is the law of the land and the wiretaps can be played. Of course considering her argument the entire sequence asking for evidence is meaningless, but the point was to argue the unfairness of DOMA to the viewing audience not to make a realistic court drama.

    So the point is made Violins play and the audience is shown just how HORRIBLE DOMA is. The liberal writers had done their work.

    And that is what we are fighting against 100 times a week on Network TV.

    Glenn Reynolds has suggested conservatives instead of shoveling money toward consultants buy some women’s magazines

    There’s nothing new about this, of course. In her 2004 book, “Spin Sisters: How the Women of The Media Sell Unhappiness — and Liberalism — to the Women of America,” Myrna Blyth (a former Ladies Home Journal editor) explained in considerable detail the variety of “Mean Girls” feminism that the women’s media aim at their readers with every issue.

    The message: There’s one way that women should think; people who don’t think that way are bad and stupid — and if you think the wrong way, women won’t like you.

    For $150 million, you could buy or start a lot of women’s Web sites. And I’d hardly change a thing in the formula. The nine articles on sex, shopping and exercise could stay the same. The 10th would just be the reverse of what’s there now.

    And THAT’s why conservatives should consider purchasing the Boston Globe.

    I can hear the cries now, Print is Dead The Unions are costly, the pension burden is huge. Michael Graham sitting in the very studio I’m siting in as this goes on the web asked who in their right minds would buy the Boston Globe? All true and if you were buying the Globe with the goal of turning a profit I’d quite agree, but consider for a moment these words from Robert Stacy McCain (emphasis mine)

    consider how rich liberals are willing to act as “angels” toward their media pets. I made this point yesterday in regard to Tina Brown, who lost $80 million during two years as editor of Talk, after losing $40 million during a three-year period as editor of The New Yorker, and who has most recently pushed back the goalposts of projected profitability at the Daily Beast to somewhere between (a) three years and (b) when hell freezes over.
    Does it not occur to you, my clever readers, that these are not merely business losses, but are in fact a sort of charitable endeavor to support the propagation of fashionable liberalism?

    Sheldon Adelson & Foster Friees put a lot of money into Newt Gingrich & Rick Santorum both strong conservative voices but consider what would happen if they put it into the Iconic name of the Boston Globe.

    First of all story selection. If you search for Jennifer Morbelli’s in the Boston Globe this is what you get:

    globe

    You would think the death of a 29-year-old woman from a botched abortion in her 33rd week of pregnancy might be newsworthy, particularly if the abolitionist in question was celebrated by the media elites at the Sundance film festival. It might even elicit some outrage, but not if the hundreds of thousands of visitors to the site or readers of the print edition never see it. As far as they are concerned it never happened.

    Something along a different vein from John Hinderaker perhaps:

    there is a huge scandal in the field of energy: the Obama administration’s sliding tens of billions of dollars to Democratic Party cronies in the “green energy” industry to support goofy projects that couldn’t exist without government favoritism. This is a real scandal, with real cronyism and real corruption, involving enormous amounts of money. Yet the media simply ignore it, because reporting on it would reflect badly on their party.

    The reaction of Globe readers? What Scandal? Hinderaker again:

    The liberal media manifest their bias not primarily by writing things that aren’t true–although that sometimes happens–but rather, by selecting what they do and do not report as news. Major scandals and events of great importance are simply ignored if they do not reflect well on the Democratic Party

    And that’s just the NEWS stories, consider the following:

  • Imagine a Movie section where the liberal themes of a picture were noted and tweaked while the conservative themes were highlighted and celebrated.
  • Imagine a culture section where events of a conservative nature were celebrated while liberals pressed to get the press.
  • Imagine reviews of plays with conservative themes getting web space and print space and liberal themes hoping for a line or two.
  • Imagine stories in the Sunday section celebrating historic places, people and sites that highlight America’s conservative History or people who are conservative doing great things for the community.
  • Imagine a whole slew of conservative Journalists cutting their teeth of straight news instead of news with a liberal spin, imagine the farm team it would create.
  • Imagine an editorial page giving conservative opinion day after day after day.
  • And imagine a web site ranked in the top 1500 worldwide and top 350 nationally, a web site that local papers around New England draw stories from giving that public conservative thought as background noise in the same way that liberals have done for ages.
  • And of course a conservative would also implement conservative business tactics in an attempt to actually turn the enterprise into a profit center rather than a loss leader.

    To the left the Boston Globe is just one more voice in their cacophony of voices they own. But to Conservatives it is the entrée to the entire New England Conversation.

    If the goal is to weaken the left it’s a no lose proposition. If conservative make an offer for the Globe and win, it can become a model of what a Conservative Paper should be and a vehicle for the reporting the stories of all type the MSM leaves behind and begin the process that Glenn Reynolds suggested.

    And at the very worst if the New York Times either refuses to sell or a Soros type jumps in will Hundreds of millions to keep the paper out of conservative hands. We get the pleasure of seeing liberals spending a fortune just for the privilege of losing money hand over fist to support their unions just to keep what they already have.

    Think about it.

    Update: Extra R in John’s name, corrected, thanks Glenn.

    *************************************************

    [thermometer raised=154 target=300 height =200 ]

    The Good news is yesterday we passed the half way mark in my weekly paycheck goal.

    The Bad news is I’m still $146 short of that $300 week paycheck.

    $146 dollars is 7 people kicking in $20. Like Yul Brenner’s Character Chris I’m looking for that Magnificent Seven in that crowd of thousands of visitors. To quote Charles Bronson;s character:

    $20? Right now that’s a lot!

    Update: The magnificent seven was the Magnificent two but the result was the same, thanks





    DaTechGuy on DaRadio Saturday Noon EST. WBNW AM 1120 Concord WPLM 1390 Plymouth, FTR Radio, the 405 Media

    money matters 003

    Get Cash for Your Pallets! 1-(800) 248-7543

    aaron test

    jeffrey’s

    jeffrey’s

    Buy Raspberry Ketone Here

    American 023

    Belanger Hardware 284 Water St · Fitchburg · (978) 342-2912

    belanger 2

    Try the Double Burger!

    nashoba

    Annie’s Book Stop of Worcester

    Annies Book Stop of Worcester 001

    Find Discounts at the Stores you Love

    TOP STORES

    pottery paintin place

    pottery paintin place

    The Navy Seals in their First Mission

    The Navy Seals in their First Mission

    Get yours for Kindle Here

    Get yours for Kindle Here

    Listen to your Granny

    RWG

    DH Gate Dot Com, Online Shopping

    ecigarette

    Bernard PC 774-322-6045

    Bernard PC 774-322-6045

    Support our favorite Charties

    Read me at Examiner.com

    Examiner badge2

    Only 114 Million Hits to retirement!

    Most Innovative Blogger 2013

    Most Innovative Blogger 2013

    Tags

    Help a Brother Knight of Mine who needs a hand