…and NO IRS special committee either

Readability

...and NO IRS special committee either

Fol­low­ing up on yesterday’s post con­cern­ing how to go for­ward on the IRS inves­ti­ga­tion there ques­tion is going to be asked, do you have a spe­cial com­mit­tee or do you just give this to the stan­dard committee’s that would han­dle such and investigation.

While there are some advan­tages to a spe­cial com­mit­tee there is a bet­ter case for using the exist­ing committees.

The biggest prob­lem with a select com­mit­tee is both sides will be appoint­ing mem­bers to it. In Man of the House Tip O’Neill talked about the issue both in terms of the Demo­c­rat Caucus:

John Moss, a Cal­i­for­nia Demo­c­rat who came to Con­gress the same year I did, wrote up a peti­tion call­ing for a spe­cial impeach­ment com­mit­tee. More often than not the mem­ber who ini­ti­ates a par­tic­u­lar piece of leg­is­la­tion end up as the chair­man of the spe­cial com­mit­tee appointed by the speaker to deal with it and that’s prob­a­bly what John had in mind –a select com­mit­tee on impeach­ment with him as chairman.

The GOP doesn’t need some­one specif­i­cally try­ing to advance them­selves that way. Mean­while on the side play­ing defense on the idea of a select committee…

.had plenty of allies on the Repub­li­can side . And there’s cer­tainly no ques­tion the White House pre­ferred a spe­cial impeach­ment com­mit­tee as well. Ont only could they con­trol the appoint­ment of the Repub­li­can mem­bers, but they also hoped to influ­ence Carl Albert to appoint enough con­ser­v­a­tive Democ­rats to pro­tect the pres­i­dent. With the Repub­li­cans already in the bag it wouldn’t take many

and the GOP has a smaller major­ity then the Democ­rats had in O’Neill’s time and no major­ity in the sen­ate (yet).

Addi­tion­ally the committee’s that are in charge of over­sight of the IRS and the mem­bers in those com­mit­tees are going to be more famil­iar with their work­ings. Even bet­ter pre­sum­ably such mem­bers are MUCH more likely to be out­raged by any IRS excess.

The left, media, and White house’s is going to be all about mak­ing any inves­ti­ga­tion a “polit­i­cal” one, that will be the game plan and we’re already see­ing signs of this card being floated. If we want this process to be and be per­ceived as a search for the truth this is the best way to go about it.

[olimome­ter id=3]

Yes­ter­day my base post was picked up all over (oddly it never made it as a meme­o­ran­dum thread) and My weekly pay­check goal of $300 has reached over 98%.

That’s a fancy way of say­ing I’m still $4 short.

So if at least one of you today thinks this site is worth more than either a value meal at Dunkin Donuts or a burger fries & drink at McDon­alds then this week’s pay­check will be made. If you do then con­sider hit­ting DaTip­Jar below.

Following up on yesterday’s post concerning how to go forward on the IRS investigation there question is going to be asked, do you have a special committee or do you just give this to the standard committee’s that would handle such and investigation.

While there are some advantages to a special committee there is a better case for using the existing committees.

The biggest problem with a select committee is both sides will be appointing members to it. In Man of the House Tip O’Neill talked about the issue both in terms of the Democrat Caucus:

John Moss, a California Democrat who came to Congress the same year I did, wrote up a petition calling for a special impeachment committee. More often than not the member who initiates a particular piece of legislation end up as the chairman of the special committee appointed by the speaker to deal with it and that’s probably what John had in mind –a select committee on impeachment with him as chairman.

The GOP doesn’t need someone specifically trying to advance themselves that way. Meanwhile on the side playing defense on the idea of a select committee…

.had plenty of allies on the Republican side . And there’s certainly no question the White House preferred a special impeachment committee as well. Ont only could they control the appointment of the Republican members, but they also hoped to influence Carl Albert to appoint enough conservative Democrats to protect the president. With the Republicans already in the bag it wouldn’t take many

and the GOP has a smaller majority then the Democrats had in O’Neill’s time and no majority in the senate (yet).

Additionally the committee’s that are in charge of oversight of the IRS and the members in those committees are going to be more familiar with their workings. Even better presumably such members are MUCH more likely to be outraged by any IRS excess.

The left, media, and White house’s is going to be all about making any investigation a “political” one, that will be the game plan and we’re already seeing signs of this card being floated. If we want this process to be and be perceived as a search for the truth this is the best way to go about it.

Olimometer 2.52

Yesterday my base post was picked up all over (oddly it never made it as a memeorandum thread) and My weekly paycheck goal of $300 has reached over 98%.

That’s a fancy way of saying I’m still $4 short.

So if at least one of you today thinks this site is worth more than either a value meal at Dunkin Donuts or a burger fries & drink at McDonalds then this week’s paycheck will be made. If you do then consider hitting DaTipJar below.