A Mormon’s Perspective On The BSA Decision

by Rebecca L | May 25th, 2013

Readability

A Mormon's Perspective On The BSA Decision

From Amer​i​cais​con​ser​v​a​tive​.org:

As a mem­ber of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-​day Saints (here­after referred to as The Church or The Church of Jesus Christ), I have been watch­ing the process the Boy Scouts of Amer­ica (BSA) has been going through the past few weeks. The Church has a century-​long rela­tion­ship with the BSA and how they voted could affect that rela­tion­ship. As a strong con­ser­v­a­tive who is actively involved in pol­i­tics, I have been con­cerned about the pres­sure that has been placed on the BSA, and other orga­ni­za­tions, to vio­late their religiously-​protected free­doms to endorse a way of life not con­sis­tent with their beliefs.

The Boy Scouts issued the fol­low­ing statement:

For 103 years, the Boy Scouts of Amer­ica has been a part of the fab­ric of this nation, with a focus on work­ing together to deliver the nation’s fore­most youth pro­gram of char­ac­ter devel­op­ment and values-​based lead­er­ship training.

Based on grow­ing input from within the Scout­ing fam­ily, the BSA lead­er­ship chose to con­duct an addi­tional review of the organization’s long-​standing mem­ber­ship pol­icy and its impact on Scouting’s mis­sion. This review cre­ated an out­pour­ing of feed­back from the Scout­ing fam­ily and the Amer­i­can pub­lic, from both those who agree with the cur­rent pol­icy and those who sup­port a change.

Today, fol­low­ing this review, the most com­pre­hen­sive lis­ten­ing exer­cise in Scouting’s his­tory the approx­i­mate 1,400 vot­ing mem­bers of the Boy Scouts of America’s National Coun­cil approved a res­o­lu­tion to remove the restric­tion deny­ing mem­ber­ship to youth on the basis of sex­ual ori­en­ta­tion alone. The res­o­lu­tion also rein­forces that Scout­ing is a youth pro­gram, and any sex­ual con­duct, whether het­ero­sex­ual or homo­sex­ual, by youth of Scout­ing age is con­trary to the virtues of Scout­ing. A change to the cur­rent mem­ber­ship pol­icy for adult lead­ers was not under con­sid­er­a­tion; thus, the pol­icy for adults remains in place. The BSA thanks all the national vot­ing mem­bers who par­tic­i­pated in this process and vote.

This pol­icy change is effec­tive Jan. 1, 2014, allow­ing the Boy Scouts of Amer­ica the tran­si­tion time needed to com­mu­ni­cate and imple­ment this pol­icy to its approx­i­mately 116,000 Scout­ing units.

The Boy Scouts of Amer­ica will not sac­ri­fice its mis­sion, or the youth served by the move­ment, by allow­ing the orga­ni­za­tion to be con­sumed by a sin­gle, divi­sive, and unre­solved soci­etal issue. As the National Exec­u­tive Com­mit­tee just com­pleted a lengthy review process, there are no plans for fur­ther review on this matter.

While peo­ple have dif­fer­ent opin­ions about this pol­icy, we can all agree that kids are bet­ter off when they are in Scout­ing. Going for­ward, our Scout­ing fam­ily will con­tinue to focus on reach­ing and serv­ing youth in order to help them grow into good, strong cit­i­zens. America’s youth need Scout­ing, and by focus­ing on the goals that unite us, we can con­tinue to accom­plish incred­i­ble things for young peo­ple and the com­mu­ni­ties we serve.”

What I read as I reviewed this mes­sage was that 1) boys are bet­ter when Scout­ing and 2) the behav­ior of scouts will remain the same.

The Church of Jesus Christ released a state­ment regard­ing the changes of the BSA:

For the past 100 years, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-​day Saints has enjoyed a strong rela­tion­ship with Boy Scouts of Amer­ica, based on our mutual inter­est in help­ing boys and young men under­stand and live their duty to God and develop upright moral behav­ior. As the Church moves for­ward in its asso­ci­a­tion with the Boy Scouts of Amer­ica, Church lead­ers will con­tinue to seek the most effec­tive ways to address the diverse needs of young peo­ple in the United States and through­out the world.

The Church’s long-​established pol­icy for par­tic­i­pa­tion in activ­i­ties is stated in the basic instruc­tional hand­book used by lay lead­ers of the Church: “young men … who agree to abide by Church stan­dards” are “wel­comed warmly and encour­aged to par­tic­i­pate” (Hand­book 2: Admin­is­ter­ing the Church [2010], 8.17.3). This pol­icy applies to Church-​sponsored Scout units. Sex­ual ori­en­ta­tion has not pre­vi­ously been — and is not now — a dis­qual­i­fy­ing fac­tor for boys who want to join Latter-​day Saint Scout troops. Will­ing­ness to abide by stan­dards of behav­ior con­tin­ues to be our com­pelling interest.

These stan­dards are out­lined in the book­let For the Strength of Youth and include absti­nence from sex­ual rela­tion­ships. We remain firmly com­mit­ted to uphold­ing these stan­dards and to pro­tect­ing and strength­en­ing boys and young men.

The Church appre­ci­ates BSA’s reaf­fir­ma­tion of its com­mit­ment to “duty to God,” which includes ser­vice to oth­ers and moral behav­ior — cen­tral prin­ci­ples of our teach­ing to young men. As in the past, the Church will work with BSA to har­mo­nize what Scout­ing has to offer with the vary­ing needs of our young men. We trust that BSA will imple­ment and admin­is­ter the approved pol­icy in an appro­pri­ate and effec­tive manner.

Many have expressed con­cern over this deci­sion. Oth­ers have expressed dis­be­lief that the Church of Jesus Christ would sup­port the BSA — say­ing it has lost its way or is pan­der­ing. I would argue that nei­ther of these is the case. As a church, “‘young men … who agree to abide by Church stan­dards’ are ‘wel­comed warmly and encour­aged to par­tic­i­pate.’” It sounds as though the Boy Scouts’ pol­icy change is actu­ally more in line with the exist­ing pol­icy of the Church.

The doc­trines of the Church help us to under­stand that we have a Heav­enly Father who is con­cerned for the wel­fare of His chil­dren. He wants us all to have an oppor­tu­nity to make it back to His pres­ence. Dur­ing His min­istry, the Lord was clear dur­ing His time on earth in telling all to “come unto me.” When I sep­a­rate pol­i­tics from reli­gion, I under­stand this decision.

Polit­i­cally, how­ever, it makes me ner­vous. I know that gay rights activists are likely cheer­ing this deci­sion and find it as a win. I believe the BSA entered into this decision-​making process from out­side pres­sure it was receiv­ing. While I believe each pri­vate orga­ni­za­tion has a right and oblig­a­tion to set the terms of its mem­ber­ship, it does con­cern me that that this process appeared to be made under pres­sure. But just because a process begins under pres­sure does not mean the out­come is made by that same pres­sure. The BSA had to eval­u­ate their value sys­tem and assess if their poli­cies reflected that. By mak­ing the deci­sion they did, I believe they are say­ing they want all young men to have an oppor­tu­nity for growth is a value-​rich envi­ron­ment. Young men (and women) make pow­er­ful deci­sions that will affect the rest of their lives start­ing at an early age. By allow­ing young men to par­tic­i­pate in uplift­ing activ­i­ties where their con­fi­dence is strength­ened and pos­i­tive virtues are rein­forced, it increases pos­i­tive decision-​making down the road.

Mov­ing for­ward, the Boy Scouts have a lot of deci­sions they will need to make as a result of this deci­sion. This includes if they choose to make changes to the require­ments and activ­i­ties. They will also likely be reeval­u­at­ing their deci­sion regard­ing gay lead­er­ship. The GLAAD spokesman stated, “Today’s vote is a sig­nif­i­cant vic­tory for gay youth across the nation and a clear indi­ca­tion that the Boy Scouts’ ban on gay adult lead­ers will also inevitably end.” The Boy Scouts orga­ni­za­tion will have to eval­u­ate that as well.

Some­times, polit­i­cal deci­sions have an all-​or-​nothing fla­vor to them. You don’t want to give an inch lest the other side take a mile or seven. In this case, a pri­vate orga­ni­za­tion has made a deci­sion to rede­fine its mem­ber­ship. While there was polit­i­cal pres­sure to do so, this deci­sion was made by the BSA. This process is chal­leng­ing the beliefs of many strong, valiant Chris­tians who are striv­ing to make deci­sions, per­son­ally and polit­i­cally, that uphold their value sys­tem. Each indi­vid­ual will need to eval­u­ate if their per­sonal value sys­tem, not just polit­i­cal beliefs, allow them to con­tinue in their mem­ber­ship or affil­i­a­tion with the Boy Scouts.

**Please note, the views expressed in this arti­cle belong to this author alone and may not nec­es­sar­ily reflect those of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-​day Saints. I do not speak for the Church. Click here for more infor­ma­tion on the Church’s stance.**

- Rebecca @ Amer​i​cais​con​ser​v​a​tive​.org

From Americaisconservative.org:

As a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (hereafter referred to as The Church or The Church of Jesus Christ), I have been watching the process the Boy Scouts of America (BSA) has been going through the past few weeks. The Church has a century-long relationship with the BSA and how they voted could affect that relationship. As a strong conservative who is actively involved in politics, I have been concerned about the pressure that has been placed on the BSA, and other organizations, to violate their religiously-protected freedoms to endorse a way of life not consistent with their beliefs.

The Boy Scouts issued the following statement:

“For 103 years, the Boy Scouts of America has been a part of the fabric of this nation, with a focus on working together to deliver the nation’s foremost youth program of character development and values-based leadership training.

“Based on growing input from within the Scouting family, the BSA leadership chose to conduct an additional review of the organization’s long-standing membership policy and its impact on Scouting’s mission. This review created an outpouring of feedback from the Scouting family and the American public, from both those who agree with the current policy and those who support a change.

“Today, following this review, the most comprehensive listening exercise in Scouting’s history the approximate 1,400 voting members of the Boy Scouts of America’s National Council approved a resolution to remove the restriction denying membership to youth on the basis of sexual orientation alone. The resolution also reinforces that Scouting is a youth program, and any sexual conduct, whether heterosexual or homosexual, by youth of Scouting age is contrary to the virtues of Scouting. A change to the current membership policy for adult leaders was not under consideration; thus, the policy for adults remains in place. The BSA thanks all the national voting members who participated in this process and vote.

“This policy change is effective Jan. 1, 2014, allowing the Boy Scouts of America the transition time needed to communicate and implement this policy to its approximately 116,000 Scouting units.

“The Boy Scouts of America will not sacrifice its mission, or the youth served by the movement, by allowing the organization to be consumed by a single, divisive, and unresolved societal issue. As the National Executive Committee just completed a lengthy review process, there are no plans for further review on this matter.

“While people have different opinions about this policy, we can all agree that kids are better off when they are in Scouting. Going forward, our Scouting family will continue to focus on reaching and serving youth in order to help them grow into good, strong citizens. America’s youth need Scouting, and by focusing on the goals that unite us, we can continue to accomplish incredible things for young people and the communities we serve.”

What I read as I reviewed this message was that 1) boys are better when Scouting and 2) the behavior of scouts will remain the same.

The Church of Jesus Christ released a statement regarding the changes of the BSA:

For the past 100 years, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has enjoyed a strong relationship with Boy Scouts of America, based on our mutual interest in helping boys and young men understand and live their duty to God and develop upright moral behavior. As the Church moves forward in its association with the Boy Scouts of America, Church leaders will continue to seek the most effective ways to address the diverse needs of young people in the United States and throughout the world.

The Church’s long-established policy for participation in activities is stated in the basic instructional handbook used by lay leaders of the Church: “young men … who agree to abide by Church standards” are “welcomed warmly and encouraged to participate” (Handbook 2: Administering the Church [2010], 8.17.3). This policy applies to Church-sponsored Scout units. Sexual orientation has not previously been—and is not now—a disqualifying factor for boys who want to join Latter-day Saint Scout troops. Willingness to abide by standards of behavior continues to be our compelling interest.

These standards are outlined in the booklet For the Strength of Youth and include abstinence from sexual relationships. We remain firmly committed to upholding these standards and to protecting and strengthening boys and young men.

The Church appreciates BSA’s reaffirmation of its commitment to “duty to God,” which includes service to others and moral behavior—central principles of our teaching to young men. As in the past, the Church will work with BSA to harmonize what Scouting has to offer with the varying needs of our young men. We trust that BSA will implement and administer the approved policy in an appropriate and effective manner.

Many have expressed concern over this decision. Others have expressed disbelief that the Church of Jesus Christ would support the BSA – saying it has lost its way or is pandering. I would argue that neither of these is the case. As a church, “‘young men … who agree to abide by Church standards’ are ‘welcomed warmly and encouraged to participate.'” It sounds as though the Boy Scouts’ policy change is actually more in line with the existing policy of the Church.

The doctrines of the Church help us to understand that we have a Heavenly Father who is concerned for the welfare of His children. He wants us all to have an opportunity to make it back to His presence. During His ministry, the Lord was clear during His time on earth in telling all to “come unto me.” When I separate politics from religion, I understand this decision.

Politically, however, it makes me nervous. I know that gay rights activists are likely cheering this decision and find it as a win. I believe the BSA entered into this decision-making process from outside pressure it was receiving. While I believe each private organization has a right and obligation to set the terms of its membership, it does concern me that that this process appeared to be made under pressure. But just because a process begins under pressure does not mean the outcome is made by that same pressure. The BSA had to evaluate their value system and assess if their policies reflected that. By making the decision they did, I believe they are saying they want all young men to have an opportunity for growth is a value-rich environment. Young men (and women) make powerful decisions that will affect the rest of their lives starting at an early age. By allowing young men to participate in uplifting activities where their confidence is strengthened and positive virtues are reinforced, it increases positive decision-making down the road.

Moving forward, the Boy Scouts have a lot of decisions they will need to make as a result of this decision. This includes if they choose to make changes to the requirements and activities. They will also likely be reevaluating their decision regarding gay leadership. The GLAAD spokesman stated, “Today’s vote is a significant victory for gay youth across the nation and a clear indication that the Boy Scouts’ ban on gay adult leaders will also inevitably end.” The Boy Scouts organization will have to evaluate that as well.

Sometimes, political decisions have an all-or-nothing flavor to them. You don’t want to give an inch lest the other side take a mile or seven. In this case, a private organization has made a decision to redefine its membership. While there was political pressure to do so, this decision was made by the BSA. This process is challenging the beliefs of many strong, valiant Christians who are striving to make decisions, personally and politically, that uphold their value system. Each individual will need to evaluate if their personal value system, not just political beliefs, allow them to continue in their membership or affiliation with the Boy Scouts.

**Please note, the views expressed in this article belong to this author alone and may not necessarily reflect those of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. I do not speak for the Church. Click here for more information on the Church’s stance.**

– Rebecca @ Americaisconservative.org

Comments are closed.

Buy My Book!

Buy My Book!

Hit DaTipJar and Support Conservative Journalism & Opinion




Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 4,147 other subscribers

DH Gate Dot Com, Online Shopping

Cheap ecigarette from China - DHgate

Best Grassroots Blogs

Winner - 2014 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Catholic CD of the Month

Know your Catholic Faith

Da Pages

Winner - 2014 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Donald Trump Calls on DaTechGuy Worcester MA

 
%d bloggers like this: