Mr. President Massachusetts Abstains, Courteously

Readability

Mr. President Massachusetts Abstains, Courteously

Lewis Mor­ris: Mr. Sec­re­tary, New York abstains, courteously.

John Han­cock: Mr. Mor­ris, WHAT IN HELL GOES ON IN NEW YORK?

1776 (1972)

In the spe­cial elec­tion to fill the seat vacated by John Kerry this year Gabriel Gomez only drew 45% of the vote that Scott Brown man­aged in 2012. Although I sup­ported him once he was nom­i­nated many con­ser­v­a­tives includ­ing Michael Gra­ham refused to go along.

they didn’t like his run­ning against his party or his posi­tions on sub­jects like Immi­gra­tion or gun con­trol and when yes­ter­day I sug­gested he might have supe­rior judge­ment than Ed Markey on a vote con­cern­ing war my friend John LaRosa dis­agreed tweeting

That is true, it’s very pos­si­ble that Gabriel Gomez would have voted with the pres­i­dent if he sat on the armed ser­vices com­mit­tee and I might have strongly dis­agreed with his position…

…but at least he would have taken one.

The Mass­a­chu­setts law­maker, sworn in to office in July after win­ning a spe­cial elec­tion, voted “present” on a res­o­lu­tion giv­ing Pres­i­dent Obama lim­ited author­ity to use mil­i­tary force against Syria. Markey, a lib­eral who often votes with Obama, didn’t vote “yes” as 10 of his Sen­ate For­eign Rela­tions Com­mit­tee col­leagues did.

He also didn’t vote “no” with seven oth­ers, includ­ing two Democ­rats. The “present” vote means Markey was there, but didn’t want to state which side he’s on.

Here is the vote

If he thought there was not enough evi­dence and needed more time for a vote he could have objected to the unan­i­mous con­sent res­o­lu­tions and have requested that addi­tional time be granted. He might have been able to get enough votes to get such a delay.

But that would require the courage of his con­vic­tions, some­thing appar­ently Sen­a­tor Markey doesn’t pos­sess. He actu­ally makes Obama look decisive.

That vote is a dis­grace to state of Mass­a­chu­setts and there is no ques­tion who is to blame for our dis­grace before the entire nation and world.

The vot­ers of Massachusetts.

The cit­i­zens who voted for Ed Markey should be ashamed of them­selves for know­ingly vot­ing for a hack pol with a his­tory of expe­di­ent votes.

We who voted for Gabriel Gomez should be ashamed they were unable or unwill­ing to do their utmost to per­suade enough peo­ple to join us.

Oddly enough the major­ity of Mass­a­chu­setts vot­ers who didn’t bother going to the polls should be over­joyed. They couldn’t be both­ered to make a deci­sion when it was time to choose a sen­a­tor and he could be both­ered to make a deci­sion when it was time to decide to autho­rize their chil­dren to fight or not. He couldn’t have rep­re­sented them better.

I thought this state was inca­pable of sur­pris­ing me any­more. I was wrong.

Clos­ing thought: Today should be the best day on the job that Kirsten Hughes has had since her elec­tion. How she han­dles this totally unex­pected gift will say as much about the GOP’s choice of her as party chair as yesterday’s vote said about the state’s choice of Ed Markey as senator.

Lewis Morris: Mr. Secretary, New York abstains, courteously.

John Hancock: Mr. Morris, WHAT IN HELL GOES ON IN NEW YORK?

1776 (1972)

In the special election to fill the seat vacated by John Kerry this year Gabriel Gomez only drew 45% of the vote that Scott Brown managed in 2012. Although I supported him once he was nominated many conservatives including Michael Graham refused to go along.

they didn’t like his running against his party or his positions on subjects like Immigration or gun control and when yesterday I suggested he might have superior judgement than Ed Markey on a vote concerning war my friend John LaRosa disagreed tweeting

 

That is true, it’s very possible that Gabriel Gomez would have voted with the president if he sat on the armed services committee and I might have strongly disagreed with his position…

…but at least he would have taken one.

The Massachusetts lawmaker, sworn in to office in July after winning a special election, voted “present” on a resolution giving President Obama limited authority to use military force against Syria. Markey, a liberal who often votes with Obama, didn’t vote “yes” as 10 of his Senate Foreign Relations Committee colleagues did.

He also didn’t vote “no” with seven others, including two Democrats. The “present” vote means Markey was there, but didn’t want to state which side he’s on.

Here is the vote

If he thought there was not enough evidence and needed more time for a vote he could have objected to the unanimous consent resolutions and have requested that additional time be granted. He might have been able to get enough votes to get such a delay.

But that would require the courage of his convictions, something apparently Senator Markey doesn’t possess. He actually makes Obama look decisive.

That vote is a disgrace to state of Massachusetts and there is no question who is to blame for our disgrace before the entire nation and world.

The voters of Massachusetts.

The citizens who voted for Ed Markey should be ashamed of themselves for knowingly voting for a hack pol with a history of expedient votes.

We who voted for Gabriel Gomez should be ashamed they were unable or unwilling to do their utmost to persuade enough people to join us.

Oddly enough the majority of Massachusetts voters who didn’t bother going to the polls should be overjoyed. They couldn’t be bothered to make a decision when it was time to choose a senator and he could be bothered to make a decision when it was time to decide to authorize their children to fight or not. He couldn’t have represented them better.

I thought this state was incapable of surprising me anymore. I was wrong.

Closing thought: Today should be the best day on the job that Kirsten Hughes has had since her election. How she handles this totally unexpected gift will say as much about the GOP’s choice of her as party chair as yesterday’s vote said about the state’s choice of Ed Markey as senator.