Nelson Mandela the man Mugabe, Castro & Putin could have been

Readability

Nelson Mandela the man Mugabe, Castro & Putin could have been

Nel­son Man­dela has died and it’s wall to wall cov­er­age time and there is some­thing impor­tant to say about him.

Man­dela was a rev­o­lu­tion­ary he set bombs and in his younger days had no prob­lem with vio­lence to achieve ends and was a friend of Fidel Castro.

What made Man­dela dif­fer­ent, what made him great was not his acts of rev­o­lu­tion or even his impris­on­ment but what he did afterwards.

It would have been so easy for him to like the Cas­tros to keep power as a dic­ta­tor for decades.

It would have been so easy to become Robert Mugabe and rig elec­tions and give spoils to his polit­i­cal allies.

It would have been so easy to rape the coun­try of South Africa and make him­self rich beyond the dreams of avarice

It would have been easy for him to set up a dummy democ­racy where he would rule behind the scenes with a pup­pet president.

It would have been so easy to decide to take revenge not only for him­self but for every black African who had been mis­treated and mur­dered under apartheid.

He did not.

The world is full of exam­ples of the for­mer, of Cas­tros of Putins of Mugabes, of men who started as rev­o­lu­tion­izes against oppres­sors and became oppres­sors itself. Even here in Amer­ica how many peo­ple were attacked in the name of “Jus­tice for Trayvon?”

Because he did not, because he eschewed vio­lence when he had the power to wreak it, because he instead restrained him­self he also restrained an entire peo­ple who could have called for blood.

This made him great.

That exam­ple is the sin­gle great­est gift he gave to the world and is rightly admired for it and will be for cen­turies to come.

If only the Cas­tros , Putins and Mugabes fol­lowed it.

Update: It’s been pointed out that later in life he never rejected the revolutionaries/​tyrants who had sup­ported him in the early days to give them­selves a veneer of respectabil­ity. That’s a fair point but I think that would have been a been a lot to expect of him given:

A: What he owed them

B: How he knew them

C: How easy it would have been for them to open up their files on him to the world

If he had man­aged to speak out against those guys it would have made him The great­est man of the 20th cen­tury rather than just a great man. Given his past what he became was amaz­ing enough, to expect that would have been miraculous.

Update 2: Stacy pro­vides a bit more his­tory for those who have ignored it:

Nel­son Man­dela was at all times a man of the Left — anti-​Western, anti-​American and anti-​Israel — as attested by the fact that as late as 2003, he could say, “All Bush wants is Iraqi oil,” make a sneer­ing ref­er­ence to Israel, accuse the U.S. of “unspeak­able atroc­i­ties,” and even play the race card over the Iraq War:

Bush is now under­min­ing the United Nations.… Both Bush, as well as Tony Blair, are under­min­ing an idea which was spon­sored by their pre­de­ces­sors. They do not care. Is it because the secretary-​general of the United Nations is now a black man? … They never did that when secretary-​generals were white.

Mandela’s tenure as pres­i­dent of South Africa was, thank God, not the night­mare that Mugabe inflicted on neigh­bor­ing Zim­babwe, but we ought not be fooled by lib­eral myth-​makers who wish to rein­vent Man­dela as a sec­u­lar saint whom all are oblig­ated to revere.

He points out that it was only when the Soviet Threat was over that things could change:

It was in this dif­fi­cult con­text, then, that the U.S. was oblig­ated to sup­port the friendly (and staunchly anti-​communist) gov­ern­ment in South Africa, not because of apartheid, but despite apartheid.

and that was the real point. If South Africa had played ball with the Sovi­ets in the 60’s-80’s and join their side you would have seen the left turn on a time and defend both South Africa & Apartheid just as they defended Hitler right up until the day he turned on the Soviets.

***********************************

[olimome­ter id=4]

It’s Thurs­day and the first week of Decem­ber remains lean.

We are a full $254 shy of this week’s goal with under three days left. This means that to make a full pay­check that pays the mort­gage and the Mag­nif­i­cent Seven like AP above we have to pull a full 75% of the goal in the last three days.

We can do it but only if you hit DaTip­Jar below.

We are 63 sub­scribers at $20 a month to make mort­gage and pay­roll with­out shak­ing the tip jar daily, please con­sider being a sub­scriber by hit­ting DaTip­Jar below:




Nelson Mandela has died and it’s wall to wall coverage time and there is something important to say about him.

Mandela was a revolutionary he set bombs and in his younger days had no problem with violence to achieve ends and was a friend of Fidel Castro.

What made Mandela different, what made him great was not his acts of revolution or even his imprisonment but what he did afterwards.

It would have been so easy for him to like the Castros to keep power as a dictator for decades.

It would have been so easy to become Robert Mugabe and rig elections and give spoils to his political allies.

It would have been so easy to rape the country of South Africa and make himself rich beyond the dreams of avarice

It would have been easy for him to set up a dummy democracy where he would rule behind the scenes with a puppet president.

It would have been so easy to decide to take revenge not only for himself but for every black African who had been mistreated and murdered under apartheid.

He did not.

The world is full of examples of the former, of Castros of Putins of Mugabes, of men who started as revolutionizes against oppressors and became oppressors itself. Even here in America how many people were attacked in the name of “Justice for Trayvon?”

Because he did not, because he eschewed violence when he had the power to wreak it, because he instead restrained himself he also restrained an entire people who could have called for blood.

This made him great.

That example is the single greatest gift he gave to the world and is rightly admired for it and will be for centuries to come.

If only the Castros , Putins and Mugabes followed it.

Update: It’s been pointed out that later in life he never rejected the revolutionaries/tyrants who had supported him in the early days to give themselves a veneer of respectability. That’s a fair point but I think that would have been a been a lot to expect of him given:

A: What he owed them

B:  How he knew them

C: How easy it would have been for them to open up their files on him to the world

If he had managed to speak out against those guys it would have made him The greatest man of the 20th century rather than just a great man.  Given his past what he became was amazing enough, to expect that would have been miraculous.

Update 2: Stacy provides a bit more history for those who have ignored it:

Nelson Mandela was at all times a man of the Left — anti-Western, anti-American and anti-Israel — as attested by the fact that as late as 2003, he could say, “All Bush wants is Iraqi oil,” make a sneering reference to Israel, accuse the U.S. of “unspeakable atrocities,” and even play the race card over the Iraq War:

Bush is now undermining the United Nations. . . . Both Bush, as well as Tony Blair, are undermining an idea which was sponsored by their predecessors. They do not care. Is it because the secretary-general of the United Nations is now a black man? . . . They never did that when secretary-generals were white.

Mandela’s tenure as president of South Africa was, thank God, not the nightmare that Mugabe inflicted on neighboring Zimbabwe, but we ought not be fooled by liberal myth-makers who wish to reinvent Mandela as a secular saint whom all are obligated to revere.

He points out that it was only when the Soviet Threat was over that things could change:

It was in this difficult context, then, that the U.S. was obligated to support the friendly (and staunchly anti-communist) government in South Africa, not because of apartheid, but despite apartheid.

and that was the real point.  If South Africa had played ball with the Soviets in the 60’s-80’s and join their side you would have seen the left turn on a time and defend both South Africa & Apartheid just as they defended Hitler right up until the day he turned on the Soviets.

***********************************

Olimometer 2.52

It’s Thursday and the first week of December remains lean.

We are a full $254 shy of this week’s goal with under three days left. This means that to make a full paycheck that pays the mortgage and the Magnificent Seven like AP above we have to pull a full 75% of the goal in the last three days.

We can do it but only if you hit DaTipJar below.

We are 63 subscribers at $20 a month to make mortgage and payroll without shaking the tip jar daily, please consider being a subscriber by hitting DaTipJar below: