I pointed out his arrest in July 2012 when he was charged with kidnapping and assaulting a woman at the height of the War on Women meme in the national & Elizabeth Warren campaign…
…the national media was not interested.
I pointed out on the radio he was convicted of the Assault charge in January with the judge specifically warning him that when a woman says no it means no,
…the national media yawned.
I linked to a story pointed out that he refused to resign and continued to work out of his jail cell
The NAACP, New England Area Conference (NEAC), respectfully requests that the Massachusetts House of Representatives abstain from voting in the matter of the expulsion of Representative Carlos Henriquez, expected to come before the House today. In the alternative, Members of the House are asked to vote against the expulsion of their colleague.
Seriously, the NAACP, one of the oldest civil rights organizations in the country is going to bat for Carlos Henriquez? Why on earth would they do this?
There are two basis on which NEAC makes the request. Firstly, the matter of expulsion is premature since Representative Henriquez’s case is under appeal. The House of Representatives must respect the Massachusetts judicial process and let Representative Henriquez’s case before the Appeals Court proceed, without jumping to judgment before the appellate decision is rendered.
Seriously? A conviction isn’t good enough, he has to lose the appeal as well. Cripes with a good set of lawyers to delay the process he could stay long enough to become speaker.
Secondly, while NEAC respects the jury’s decision, there is currently no rule for expulsion that applies to misdemeanor convictions. Representative Henriquez was duly elected by the electorate and there is no legal basis upon which the House of Representatives can properly act.
So there is no specific rule for expelling a member of the Massachusetts House if they assault a women who refuses them sex. That’s seriously the argument the NAACP is making?
Let’s forget for a moment how this symbolizes the fall of the NAACP as a civil rights organization that this letter illustrates and look at this simply in terms of news.
I know I’m just a blogger & radio talk show host, but it seems to me that the NAACP actively working to make sure a democrat convicted of assaulting a woman who refused him sex is something that would not only be Immediately be recognized as Newsworthy, but given the “War on Women” meme would elevate this to a national story.
Oh and if you claim to be a feminist & aren’t outraged by this, then you’re lying to yourself.
Update: (Sunday) Delayed Instalance this morning, Hi all, It’s worth noting that the WSJ linked yesterday someday it might provide the traffic Glenn does.
It’s Friday and we still find ourselves short of this week $345 paycheck goal.
If we can find 10 tip jar hitters to kick in $25 today that goal will be made.
Can we do it? That’s up to you, and I ask you to be one of them by hitting DaTipJar below
UPDATE we didn’t make the goal last week but there is not only a new goal this week but a new premium for subscribers that was only announced Sunday
[olimometer id=2]
Only 553⁄4 more subscribers @ at $20 a month are necessary to secure the cost of DaMagnificent Seven & my monthly mortgage on a permanent basis. (one extra one will pay for our newest writer author Tim Imholt)
If you subscribe at the $25 level or more there is a new premium that you can receive one of several Exclusive Original Chris Muir high Res Graphics of the original members of DaTechGuy’s Magnificent Seven Gang.
Please specify which of the eight hi res (including myself you wish to receive) Subscribe at $50 a month and receive all eight. Subscribe at $100 a month and get all 8 wanted posters high res graphics plug the high res version of all of us exclusively created for subscribers of DaTechGuy blog by Chris Muir himself!
I pointed out his arrest in July 2012 when he was charged with kidnapping and assaulting a woman at the height of the War on Women meme in the national & Elizabeth Warren campaign…
…the national media was not interested.
I pointed out on the radio he was convicted of the Assault charge in January with the judge specifically warning him that when a woman says no it means no,
…the national media yawned.
I linked to a story pointed out that he refused to resign and continued to work out of his jail cell
The NAACP, New England Area Conference (NEAC), respectfully requests that the Massachusetts House of Representatives abstain from voting in the matter of the expulsion of Representative Carlos Henriquez, expected to come before the House today. In the alternative, Members of the House are asked to vote against the expulsion of their colleague.
Seriously, the NAACP, one of the oldest civil rights organizations in the country is going to bat for Carlos Henriquez? Why on earth would they do this?
There are two basis on which NEAC makes the request. Firstly, the matter of expulsion is premature since Representative Henriquez’s case is under appeal. The House of Representatives must respect the Massachusetts judicial process and let Representative Henriquez’s case before the Appeals Court proceed, without jumping to judgment before the appellate decision is rendered.
Seriously? A conviction isn’t good enough, he has to lose the appeal as well. Cripes with a good set of lawyers to delay the process he could stay long enough to become speaker.
Secondly, while NEAC respects the jury’s decision, there is currently no rule for expulsion that applies to misdemeanor convictions. Representative Henriquez was duly elected by the electorate and there is no legal basis upon which the House of Representatives can properly act.
So there is no specific rule for expelling a member of the Massachusetts House if they assault a women who refuses them sex. That’s seriously the argument the NAACP is making?
Let’s forget for a moment how this symbolizes the fall of the NAACP as a civil rights organization that this letter illustrates and look at this simply in terms of news.
I know I’m just a blogger & radio talk show host, but it seems to me that the NAACP actively working to make sure a democrat convicted of assaulting a woman who refused him sex is something that would not only be Immediately be recognized as Newsworthy, but given the “War on Women” meme would elevate this to a national story.
Oh and if you claim to be a feminist & aren’t outraged by this, then you’re lying to yourself.
Update: (Sunday) Delayed Instalance this morning, Hi all, It’s worth noting that the WSJ linked yesterday someday it might provide the traffic Glenn does.
It’s Friday and we still find ourselves short of this week $345 paycheck goal.
If we can find 10 tip jar hitters to kick in $25 today that goal will be made.
Can we do it? That’s up to you, and I ask you to be one of them by hitting DaTipJar below
UPDATE we didn’t make the goal last week but there is not only a new goal this week but a new premium for subscribers that was only announced Sunday
Only 55 3/4 more subscribers @ at $20 a month are necessary to secure the cost of DaMagnificent Seven & my monthly mortgage on a permanent basis. (one extra one will pay for our newest writer author Tim Imholt)
If you subscribe at the $25 level or more there is a new premium that you can receive one of several Exclusive Original Chris Muir high Res Graphics of the original members of DaTechGuy’s Magnificent Seven Gang.
Please specify which of the eight hi res (including myself you wish to receive) Subscribe at $50 a month and receive all eight. Subscribe at $100 a month and get all 8 wanted posters high res graphics plug the high res version of all of us exclusively created for subscribers of DaTechGuy blog by Chris Muir himself!
[…] of victims, the NAACP has come out in favour of a wife beater. Seriously. In. Writing. Oh wait, he’s a politician – politicians are allowed to beat their wives… […]
[…] House of Representatives to expel a (liberal) member just because of a li’l thing like being convicted of sexual assault. (But remember, it’s the conservatives who are waging a so-called “War on […]
Tammy Bruce was the head of NOW’s L.A. chapter when the OJ trial was going on. She wanted to hold demonstrations because it was a case of violence against women. She was ORDERED not to do that. The Hernandez case is probably another instance of that.
The Massachusetts House voted today to expel Representative Carlos Henriquez, a Dorchester Democrat who had been convicted on two counts of misdemeanor assault in a July 2012 attack on a woman he knew.
The House voted, 146-5, after about an hour and a half of debate that included Henriquez taking the floor to declare his innocence.
“The truth always remains the same. The truth is, I never touched my accuser in any way, at any point in time, that would result in harm or injury,” he said in remarks that lasted about six minutes.“Although a jury found me guilty … it does not change my truth.”
Oh God, you who gave free will to your creation, bless those who use that precious gift to blog.
May we though this gift of freedom of expression enlighten, entertain and inform our readers, and we ask particular blessing for those who bring your word across the net, that they may faithfully execute your command to make disciples of all nations.
WQPH Invites You toThe Festival of the Blessed Virgin Mary Sept 8-15:
Festival of the Blessed Virgin Mary
Se… http://t.co/4R189aDLI7
I think we can safely conclude that the officer in #McKinley will not justify his acts claiming the teenage girl had a concealed weapon 7 months ago
OK I adit it I an’t get to sleep because I’m in a #montypython state of mind. melody by Billy Joel words by Eric Idle, John Cleese etc etc 7 months ago
Exactly how much Cartesian Dualism is too much? 7 months ago
Remember the old days when instead of points we got grenstamps when we bought stuff, or was it dung & a dead indian? youtube.com/watch?v=KfV_cY…7 months ago
[…] Massachusetts talk host Peter Ingemi, who blogs as Da Tech Guy, pointed out the obvious on Friday: […]
[…] of victims, the NAACP has come out in favour of a wife beater. Seriously. In. Writing. Oh wait, he’s a politician – politicians are allowed to beat their wives… […]
[…] House of Representatives to expel a (liberal) member just because of a li’l thing like being convicted of sexual assault. (But remember, it’s the conservatives who are waging a so-called “War on […]
Tammy Bruce was the head of NOW’s L.A. chapter when the OJ trial was going on. She wanted to hold demonstrations because it was a case of violence against women. She was ORDERED not to do that. The Hernandez case is probably another instance of that.
[…] by Democrats. Not to mention the […]
[…] […]
Pete – you got the money line… he’s a DEMOCRAT! Absolves all sins
The result:
The Massachusetts House voted today to expel Representative Carlos Henriquez, a Dorchester Democrat who had been convicted on two counts of misdemeanor assault in a July 2012 attack on a woman he knew.
The House voted, 146-5, after about an hour and a half of debate that included Henriquez taking the floor to declare his innocence.
“The truth always remains the same. The truth is, I never touched my accuser in any way, at any point in time, that would result in harm or injury,” he said in remarks that lasted about six minutes. “Although a jury found me guilty … it does not change my truth.”
[…] media may not care about a Carlos Henriquez but it’s pretty hard to ignore a Bill […]