By Steve Eggleston

Yesterday, the February jobs report was released. On a seasonally-adjusted basis, the economy added 175,000 jobs, with 162,000 coming in the private sector.

Meanwhile, the unemployment rate ticked up by 0.1 percentage points to 6.7% as 264,000 people entered or re-entered the workforce and employment increased by only 42,000. That was not enough to move either the Labor Force Participation Rate or the Employment-Population Ratio from January’s historically-low 63.0% LFPR and 58.8% EPR.

Economists had expected roughly 150,000 jobs added with cold weather affecting the numbers, with those taking the weak economic news from the ADP payroll report and the ISM Services report into account predicting even fewer jobs added. Despite the stronger-than-expected toplines, Reuters didn’t disappoint the weather alarmists, blaming the cold for a drop in the number of hours worked.

Even though the toplines were better than expected, the report itself threw cold water on those who thought it was a great number (emphasis added):

Establishment Survey Data

Total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 175,000 in February. Job growth averaged 189,000 per month over the prior 12 months.

Further, Tom Blumer found the results wanting compared to history. On a seasonally-unadjusted basis, the 750,000 total jobs and 300,000 private-sector jobs represent the worst February since 2010, which was also the last month that there was a loss of jobs on a seasonally-adjusted basis.

The phenomenon of a significant increase in jobs in February is a relatively-recent one, going back only to 1995. This February’s 0.52% increase, while a bit better than the mean average of 0.51% between 1995 and 2013, is in the bottom half of performances and worse than the median of 0.54%.

What isn’t a recent phenomenon is the February-June hiring spree Tom talked about. The number of jobs increased by an average of 2.70% in those months between 1948 and 2013. While the prior 3 years were a bit better than that, if things continue the way they went last month, the economy will be struggling to increase the number of jobs by 2% in that stretch.

It is 4:45 at CPAC national harbor and I was about to write something about CPAC or schedule a few new videos when I decided to take a quick peek at

That’s where I saw this story at the New York Times by Chrystia Freeland in headlines with the title:

Russia Has Already Lost the War

Now our media friends on the left as I’ve already said are doing their best to turn the successful occupation and annexation of a part of another country as no big deal so, in that respect, that statement is no more idiotic than anything else our leftist friends in the MSM say. However on a whim I read the piece and found there was one paragraph that hit me like a 2 x 4 across the head in disbelief.

First there was the lead in …

For Ukraine, as well as for Russia and much of the former U.S.S.R., the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 was only a partial revolution. The U.S.S.R. vanished, but the old nomenklatura, and its venal, authoritarian style of governance remained. Mr. Putin is explicitly drawing on that heritage and fitfully trying to reshape it into a new state capitalist system that can compete and flourish globally. An alliance with Mr. Yanukovych’s Ukraine was an essential part of that plan.

meh no big deal a tad bit of spin but nothing beyond the normal MSM pabulum.

But the paragraph that followed that just blew me away (all emphasis mine)

That effort has now failed. Whatever Mr. Putin achieves in Ukraine, it will not be partnership with a Slavic younger brother enthusiastically joining in his neo-imperialist, neo-Soviet project.


Have these people ever heard about the Soviet Union? How it was formed, what it did? How it was maintained?

Where in the history of the Soviet Era does the word “enthusiastic” come into play other than restraining dissidents?

Does Chrystia Freeland really think that Vladimir Putin, an old KGB communist guy, care if the areas that are either annexed or turned into puppet states are enthusiastic about it? Can she actually believe that he considers it a failure that “conquered” lands are not cheering of their own accord? Can a person who writes about foreign affairs in the paper of record actually be that ignorant of both history and human nature?

Not only apparently can it be the case but the NYT, the old paper of Walter “love that famine” Duranty, will happily print it with a straight face.

I submit and suggest that any person who would make such a statement should not be taken seriously on any question of foreign affairs. I further suggest that any publication that would consider that statement serious should not be considered the paper of record of anything.

But that’s just me.


Olimometer 2.52

Saturday is here and I regret to say this weeks Goal is not

We are still a full $235 from a full paycheck for me and my magnificent seven (plus 2)

This is a very bad thing and with not to many hours left the only way that will change is if you decide it’s worth changing, so if you do please hit DaTipJar below

And remember we only need 61 Subscribers at $20 and all of this will be taken care of for the full year. Your reading will not be cluttered with my pitches and my Fridays and Saturdays particularly will contain a whole lot less worry (and I frankly don’t have the hair to spare)

by baldilocks

As the opposite is so for many of us in America, citizens reared in other countries have little understanding of politics, history, and culture(s) in the USA.  I am in a special place in that my biological father is Kenyan and my siblings from the Old Country have trouble understanding the political opposition to Barack Obama—especially mine. To them, he is of our tribe and our brother who should have our support no matter what.  

Therefore, I am in the process of composing a series of posts meant to help the Kenyan part of my family understand that opposition. I may post them here, but for this particular post, I want to expand on an idea/observation which stems from an encounter I had this morning and, later, try to relate it to the upcoming posts. Call it a preamble.

After waking this morning, I got up, washed my face, brushed my teeth, threw on some clothes, and, without breakfast or coffee, went to get my hair cut (shaved). Black barbershops have a justifiable reputation for being places where real talk occurs and, sometimes, where shouting and anger occur.  Being un-caffeinated, I was in no mood to get into any conversation; much less, a political one with a bunch of liberals, but my barber alerted the room that I was a Republican. So the game was afoot.

Many wonder why black conservatives refuse to talk to black liberals about conservatism. It’s simply this: they won’t STFU long enough to let you complete an idea.  In addition, having to, once again, listen to able-bodied, able-minded, working, responsible, black adults go on about what the “white man” owes “us,” made me want to scream, though I restrained myself.

Being out-numbered 3-1, being talked over multiple times, being insulted more than once, not being allowed to answer proffered questions, and having my actual answers ignored, at some point–out of frustration–I let the “conversation” go. However, I was able to put forth a couple of ideas which I had not completely articulated in the past. One follows in a longer form than I was able to get out earlier today.

Black people—not just those who are American—view white people in the same manner that anti-theists view God. Anti-theists are different from atheists. Even though the former deny God’s existence with their mouths and keyboards, they believe in Him…and they hate Him. Many black people have a similar view of white people: they view all of you as their hated masters–yes, still, in 2014—but their masters, nonetheless. Moreover, as our masters, it is your duty to feed, clothe, and house us; and to give us anything else we ask of you.

As history shows, before the Civil Rights Era, most black Americans were Republicans; now, because of well-crafted strategy implemented by LBJ, et al., most are Democrats. That strategy is based on the real slavery mindset: that whoever provides the most things—whoever is the most generous patron to black people–is a friend to black people.  LBJ knew this; therefore, he strove to transform his party’s image into that of the good and generous patron.

Patron:  5 :  a master in ancient times who freed his slave but retained some rights over him

Even though the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863 and the Civil Rights Act of 1964 respectively disallowed patronage and de facto serfdom, the mindset remains embedded in the progeny of the “former” slaves/serfs . Thus, since the CRA, most black Americans have given their allegiance to the Democrat Party and, because of the mindset, they have certain expectations of white Americans—those expected of a patron.

From that notion comes this one: many black liberals believe that black conservatives give their allegiance to the Republican Party for the exact same reason, and that they are, therefore, sell-outs. (Note that, to black liberals, even politics always involves some imagined sale of black persons.) They are unable to view white persons outside of the master/patron/domination paradigm and cannot envision any relationship between black persons and white persons outside of that perspective. Somebody has to be on top. And, in light of our past[i] and our indoctrinated and unacknowledged feelings of inferiority, most black liberals believe it will be you, my white friends.

Most black conservatives have freed themselves from this mindset, but, like all long-term indoctrination, it remains insidious.

Therefore, I conclude this: until the majority of black people get white people out of their heads and begin view you as equals, the shouts of racism will continue, as will the shout-down of the truly emancipated. Freedom begins inside.

[i] The history of enslavement of black Africans begins well before the European and American involvement therein.

Juliette Akinyi Ochieng blogs at baldilocks. Her first novel, Tale of the Tigers: Love is Not a Game, was published in 2009; the second edition in 2012. Her new novel, Arlen’s Harem, is due in early 2014. Help her fund it and help keep her blog alive!


If you become one of the 55 3/4 subscribers @ at $20 a month are necessary to secure the cost of DaMagnificent Seven & my monthly mortgage on a permanent basis but do so at the $25 levelBaldilocks mini
you can receive one of several Exclusive Original Chris Muir high Res Graphics of the original members of DaTechGuy’s Magnificent Seven Gang. like the one on the right

Beanie : $2.00USD – weeklyCap : $10.00USD – monthlyHat : $20.00USD – monthlyFedora : $25.00USD – monthlyGrand Fedora : $100.00USD – monthly

Low res tha lotPlease specify which of the eight hi res (including myself you wish to receive) Subscribe at $50 a month and receive all eight. Subscribe at $100 a month and get all 8 wanted posters high res graphics plug the high res version of all of us exclusively created for subscribers of DaTechGuy blog by Chris Muir himself!

Today we are at CPAC at the Gaylord National Harbor ad DaTechGuy on DaRadio will be broadcasting live.

We will have a rotating set us guests talking about their project bust will also talk about CPAC proper and what I’ve seen and what it will mean.

This is always a spontaneous show from CPAC so we will see how it goes and who we might see.

As always you can join the conversation by dialing in at 888-9-fedora (unless you are listening to the 11 PM replace or the 405 media replay.

and also as always you have multiple options to hear the show via our online streams click the links to listen.

on FTR Radio

And of course there are the terrestrial stations in the Money Matters Radio Network

WBNW Concord Ma 1120 AM FLAGSHIP

WPLM 1390 AM Plymouth MA

WESO 970 AM Southbridge MA

(and on the Terrestrial stations the replay is 11 PM EST tonight)

And if you miss all of these you can now catch our show on replayed on the 405 media out of California every Tuesday Noon EST (9 AM Pacific)

If you’ve been glued to your TV set you likely saw many of the things at CPAC 2014 that I’ll be writing & talking about but I think the person I’ll remember most is Fireman George Miller of the USS Randolph

FYI the reason why I know about Mr. Miller is not because he was a prop to Col / Congressman West’s speech but because as the Col worked the crowd coming in meeting people Mr. Miller was in that crowd, Mr. West greeted him and acknowledged him afterwards.

I’d have to say there are a lot of interviews I will be posting from CPAC 2014 but so far this one was my favorite.


Olimometer 2.52

Saturday is here and I regret to say this weeks Goal is not

We are still a full $235 from a full paycheck for me and my magnificent seven (plus 2)

This is a very bad thing and with not to many hours left the only way that will change is if you decide it’s worth changing, so if you do please hit DaTipJar below

And remember we only need 61 Subscribers at $20 and all of this will be taken care of for the full year. Your reading will not be cluttered with my pitches and my Fridays and Saturdays particularly will contain a whole lot less worry (and I frankly don’t have the hair to spare)