By Pat Austin
SHREVEPORT — A couple of weeks ago I posted that it had been “a tough week to be Mary Landrieu.” I probably should have waited until this week to use that title. There seems to be very little good news for the embattled Senator in the news this week.
Early in the week Clare Foran at The National Journal wrote about the abandonment of Senator Landrieu by the environmentalists. “They just can’t stand her stance on global warming,” Foran says.
In the past year, only one environmental organization has donated to her campaign. The Baton Rouge-based Center for Coastal Conservation gave Landrieu a $2,500 nod, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. The Sierra Club, Natural Resources Defense Council, and Environmental Defense Fund have handed over a combined contribution of exactly nothing. All three groups declined to comment on the record when asked whether they would endorse Landrieu.
Louisiana is peppered with oil and gas wells; we have just under two dozen petroleum refineries. And Landrieu is savvy enough to know that these are important jobs votes in her pocket. She has to walk a fine line.
Which brings us to what is really going on with Mary Landrieu’s campaign.
Louisiana attorney, and occasional fill-in host for local conservative talk show host Moon Griffon, Paul Hurd has a post at The Dead Pelican which makes very clear the challenges Senator Landrieu faces and what her campaign staff is attempting to do about it:
The Landrieu machine’s new snake oil is the assertion that Senator Landrieu is too valuable to Louisiana and the Oil and Gas Industry as the Chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resource Committee to let her get beat and have the Energy Committee controlled by pro-energy independent Republicans. This is the new political Hadicol being sold to the masses in Louisiana.
As we all know, Landrieu has a new plum position as head of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. The Washington Post sang the same tune about the angry environmentalists back in February:
Landrieu favors building the Keystone XL pipeline, protecting tax breaks or incentives for oil drilling, and placing limits on the power of federal agencies to set mercury or carbon dioxide guidelines for coal-fired power plants. Wyden takes the opposite position on all those issues.
Landrieu supports giving oil companies the right to export crude oil as well as natural gas, while Wyden supports giving natural gas export permits on a case by case basis and does not have a public position on crude oil exports.
The Louisiana Democrat helps maintain the Democrats’ majority in the Senate, but she is closer to the oil and gas industry than most other members of her party.
Au contraire, says Paul Hurd (emphasis mine):
Let’s look at voting record of Senator Landrieu and the members of the Senate Energy Committee, grouped by Democrats in control now, compared to the Republican members who would gain control of energy policy with the defeat of Senator Landrieu. One way to compare voting records is to use scorecards of business and the radical conservationists to see who supports energy growth and who does not. The League of Conservation Voters is a typical, extreme environmental advocacy group that takes every stand possible to prevent America from producing clean, abundant and American energy. Its Action Plans includes “Speaking out against the XL Keystone Pipeline,” “Protecting Us from Toxic Coal Ash” and “Support for Climate Change Action.” Their position is unrepentant destruction of the hydro-carbon based energy industry in America, and that means the destruction of Louisiana’s economy.
In contract, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is a middle of the road, pro-business lobbying group that recognizes the need for clean and affordable production of energy in America to support our own economic growth and avoid shipping energy dollars to China and the Middle East to fund our global adversaries. And for Louisiana, royalty checks spend just fine in Louisiana.
Each of these groups provide a scorecard for the votes taken by our federal Congressmen and Senators. What these scorecards show is clear and remarkable. The average rating by the League of Conservation for 2013 for the twelve Democratic members of the Energy Committee is an astounding 91%, while the ten Republican members average a Conservation Voter rating of only 16%. In contrast, the Chamber of Commerce provides an average rating of the Democratic members of the Committee of 50%, while the Republican members of the Committee score an average of 91%. In short, these ratings by business and environmental groups show that continued Democratic control of the Senate Energy Committee promises Louisiana and America continuing government suppression of independent energy production in Louisiana and in America.
What all this means is that Mary Landrieu knows that she is in trouble. She is scrambling to do whatever it takes to deflect discussion of her Obamacare vote even to the point of now trying to act like she wants to amend it. She’s spent the better part of 18 months trying to distance herself from the Obama circus. It’s not working for me.
Remember in April 2010? She was “a vociferous defender” of Obamacare and even told one Morgan City businessman who was worried about having to lay off employees to “live with it.” But now we’re supposed to believe she isn’t happy with it.
Quite honestly, I wish she’d read the Obamacare bill before she took that $300 million kickback for it. Vote for it now and fix it later? Nah. I don’t think so. That’s just transparent politicking and I’ve no respect for that.
And now we’re supposed to believe she is a vociferous defender of Louisiana’s oil and gas industry.
Pat Austin also blogs at And So it Goes in Shreveport.