Deputy: Yeah, in Dallas they do it [hanging] in a barn outside town.

Judge Roy Bean: Like they was ashamed of it? Why, l’d rather give up hanging. No, sir. The law says that the guilty shall be punished. And l say it shall be done in broad daylight… in the open, not sneaking around. Like you was the ones that was guilty, not them.

The Life and Times of Judge Roy Bean 1972

via Drew’s Script’o Rama

Harry Callahan:  Well I’m all broken up about that man’s rights

Dirty Harry 1971

There are some serious arguments one can make against the death penalty,  Conservatives against the Death Penalty notes the expense of the appeals process , The Innocence Project argues that it captures the innocent as well as the guilty and the Catechism of the Catholic Church while noting that a state has “the right and duty to inflict penalties commensurate with the gravity of the crime” says the following about the death penalty:

2267 The traditional teaching of the Church does not exclude, presupposing full ascertainment of the identity and responsibility of the offender, recourse to the death penalty, when this is the only practicable way to defend the lives of human beings effectively against the aggressor. “If, instead, bloodless means are sufficient to defend against the aggressor and to protect the safety of persons, public authority should limit itself to such means, because they better correspond to the concrete conditions of the common good and are more in conformity to the dignity of the human person. “Today, in fact, given the means at the State’s disposal to effectively repress crime by rendering inoffensive the one who has committed it, without depriving him definitively of the possibility of redeeming himself, cases of absolute necessity for suppression of the offender ‘today … are very rare, if not practically non-existent.

These arguments however have failed to move the numbers significantly however the “botched” execution from last week that the media covered extensively gave those who oppose the death penalty a lot of hope that this would change and the media played that to the hilt   However such hope doesn’t spring eternal:

A badly botched lethal injection in Oklahoma has not chipped away at the American public’s support of the death penalty, although two-thirds of voters would back alternatives to the needle, an exclusive NBC News poll shows. …

A comfortable majority of those questioned — 59% — said they favor the death penalty as the ultimate punishment for murder, while 35% said they are opposed.

Via Hotair which also had this interesting tidbit

Having a family member who has been in prison or on probation did not make a respondent more likely to oppose or support the death penalty.

Of course not, people know when their relatives are no good SOB’s

Why did this botched execution which drew national attention not make a dent?  Because in the end a lot of the opposition to the death penalty is really a story of the ICK factor and if you don’t believe me listen to Emily Bazelon make her case:

In the wake of Oklahoma’s horrifying mis-execution of Clayton Lockett, could the death penalty itself die off? It seems impossible, I know. Polls show support falling, but still at about 55 percent. And yet, that’s the death penalty in the abstract. On the ground, in many states, a different reality is playing out — one that demonstrates growing discomfort with capital punishment.

There is one looming exception to this rule: the South. The death penalty has become largely a regional phenomenon that divides the South from the rest of the country. While the death penalty remains legal in 32 states, actual death sentences and executions are concentrated in a small and shrinking number of them. 

Ms. Bazelon may find mr Lockett’s death “horrifying” and talk of the division of the south as if they are a bunch of barbarians but as Ann Coulter notes ICK is a relative term:

Maybe they — and MSNBC’s similarly high-minded Rachel Maddow — should comfort themselves by thinking of Lockett’s execution as a very, very, very late-term abortion. You know, the kind that liberal darling Wendy Davis filibustered for 11 hours to keep legal. 

Since Rachel and the Times are such big fans of partial-birth abortion, would they mind if we took a gigantic pair of scissors, jammed them in the back of Clayton Lockett’s head and let his brain slide out? Let’s get Kermit Gosnell working again! 

Or how about giving the citizens of Oklahoma the right to choose an acid bath for condemned murderers? We’ll submerge people like Lockett in a tub filled with burning fluid until he’s mostly disintegrated and can be flushed down the toilet. (If it’s low-flow, flush twice.) 

Or maybe an industrial vacuum designed to tear Lockett’s body apart. 

but it’s her next sentence that delivers the Bazinga:

Which reminds me: Would the Times ever give as detailed a description of an abortion as it does for the execution of a remorseless killer? The odds are pretty high that the baby isn’t even a rapist/murderer. 

There are those who oppose the death penalty for noble reasons, but a lot of the opposition is based on the ICK factor and for some reason that ICK factor doesn’t seem to apply to them on abortion.

In the end though when it comes to keeping the death penalty the ICK factor of an execution, even a botched one  is overridden by the ICK factor of this:

Oklahoma teenager Stephanie Neiman had just graduated from Perry High School that night in June 1999 when she and another girl went to visit their friend Bobby Boynt. Neiman, 19, was driving her blue Chevy pickup with a personalized license plate, “TAZZZ,” for the Tasmanian Devil cartoon character. Neiman and her 18-year-old friend’s trip to the Boynt residence was one of those “wrong place, wrong time” disasters. They arrived just as Boynt, the 23-year-old father of a 9-month-old infant, was being assaulted by three men:

Clayton Lockett, 23, his cousin, Alfonzo Lockett, 17 and Shawn Mathis, 26, were already there. While Boynt’s baby son slept in another room, they had tied up and were beating Boynt because he owed money to Clayton Lockett.
When Neiman’s friend went inside the home they hit her with a shotgun then forced her to call Neiman into the home.
They repeatedly raped Neiman’s 18-year-old friend, tied up the two women then used Neiman’s truck to take the adults and the baby to a rural part of Kay County. When Neiman refused to give Clayton Lockett the keys to her truck or provide him the alarm code, he ordered Stephanie to kneel while Mathis dug a grave.
Lockett shot her and the gun jammed. While Neiman lay there screaming, the attackers cleared the jam and Lockett shot her a second time. Even though she was still breathing, he ordered the other two attackers to drag her into the grave and bury her.

You want an ick factor Emily?  That’s an ICK factor

For myself I’m indifferent other than the fact that a live person has a chance to be converted and repent while the dead do not, given that possibility I think there is no greater satisfaction in the universe that to pick a soul right out of Satan’s back pocket.

If the world hates you, realize that it hated me first. If you belonged to the world, the world would love its own; but because you do not belong to the world, and I have chosen you out of the world, the world hates you. Remember the word I spoke to you, ‘No slave is greater than his master.’ If they persecuted me, they will also persecute you. If they kept my word, they will also keep yours. And they will do all these things to you on account of my name, because they do not know the one who sent me. If I had not come and spoken to them, they would have no sin; but as it is they have no excuse for their sin. Whoever hates me also hates my Father.

John 15:18-23

The war on Christians continues:

In a statement provided first to TheDC on Friday, the Benham brothers confirmed that SunTrust Banks has pulled all of its listed properties with the Benham brothers’ bank-owned property business, which includes several franchisees across four states.

The move comes just a week after HGTV announced it was canceling a planned home renovation show hosted by the brothers.

I’m a great believer in personal freedom for individuals & business.  If Sun Trust doesn’t want to do business with followers of Christ that’s certainly their right.

And if follows of Christ choose to take their business elsewhere, (and I submit and suggest if you are you should) that’s fine too.

May they be happy in the path they have chosen.

As for Benham brothers I say rejoice and be exceedingly glad.

Update: Hey maybe Sun Trust can replace Christian depositors with this guy:

Someone cut the head off a statue of the Virgin Mary and left it lying on the ground at a Knights of Columbus chapter on Long Island, police said Thursday.

Luckily for the Knights we can get financial services through our order.

Update 2: I wrote the first post in Orlando Florida waiting for my connection to Birmingham AL and EWTN. One Mass & Adoration later and my how things have changed:

After an uproar from conservative customers, SunTrust Banks announced Friday afternoon that the decision to end its relationship with real estate entrepreneurs David and Jason Benham had been reversed.

Well banks are also called counting houses and apparently somebody decided to count how many Christians there are…

By Friday afternoon, SunTrust released a statement saying the decision had been reversed. The bank didn’t go into detail about why they originally cut ties with the Benham brothers, though SunTrust said the decision was made by a third party vendor. TheDC reported earlier Friday that the vendor had told a Benham Brothers franchisee that the bank itself made the decision.

Another defeat for the people trying to enforce Secular Blasphemy laws.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2014/05/16/suntrust-reverses-decision-on-conservative-benham-brothers/#ixzz31wHFCHDh

Sgt. Schultz: Oh I see nothing, I was not here, I didn’t even get up this morning!

Hogan’s Heroes Hold That Tiger 1965

Was it just a few months ago,  after we found the investigator of the IRS scandal was an Obama donor & was rather tardy in interviewing victims that the press which have systematically ignored the IRS scandal reported charges in the IRS case were unlikely?

Perhaps they might want to reassess that idea:

Judicial Watch today released a new batch of Internal Revenue Service (IRS) documents revealing that its handling of Tea Party applications was directed out of the agency’s headquarters in Washington, DC. The documents also show extensive pressure on the IRS by Senator Carl Levin (D-MI) to shut down conservative-leaning tax-exempt organizations. The IRS’ emails by Lois Lerner detail her misleading explanations to investigators about the targeting of Tea Party organizations.

That a sitting US senator was pushing on this is incredible that it’s taken a FOIA request for this data to come out is disgraceful and Glenn Reynolds notes a coincidence:

Interesting, isn’t it, that Levin decided not to run for re-election after the IRS scandal got out.

Elizabeth Scalia asks the question:

My answer: Can you count the number of grains of sand on at the seashore?

Remember, while the Benghazi hearings are a source of political fear due to the political danger involved, the decisions involved were judgement calls, bad judgement, disgraceful judgements, but legal ones. The only possible criminality there is the withholding of evidence that they can make an executive privilege claim on if they so choose.

The IRS scandal is different. It’s a source of not just political danger but actual danger. If the agency was used by the Democrats & the White House to target their enemies those who did it are subject to criminal penalties and perhaps even large civil judgement if the targets choose to sue over lost revenue (how many donors will happily testify that they withheld funds due to fears of the IRS?).

That is why no matter how many e-mails are released and revealed left will not acknowledge the IRS scandal, why they will deny it, lie about it and punish all those who do otherwise. And the US media (outside of Fox) will do the same.

Outside of the US that’s a different story:

The Internal Revenue Service managed a wide-ranging program that singled out tea party groups for special scrutiny from its headquarters in Washington, D.C., according to bombshell documents released Wednesday by a watchdog organization.


Judicial Watch, a center-right group that specializes in Freedom Of Information Act document requests and lawsuits, said it received a cache of papers from the IRS showing the depth of the Obama administration’s involvement in what officials have previously called the work of a few ‘rogue agents’ in Cincinnati, Ohio.
And letters from U.S. Sen. Carl Levin, a Michigan Democrat, show his involvement in pressing the IRS to target mostly conservative organizations with cumbersome questionnaires seemingly calculated to slow down their applications for tax-exempt status in the middle of an election year.


In one July 2010 email among IRS managers, a lawyer with the Exempt Organizations Technical unit in Washington wrote that his office was ‘working the Tea party applications in coordination with Cincy.’

Very few people will see that in print in the US and practically nobody will see it reported on the “mainstream” news sites. Even fewer will read the e-mails here.

If you want to know why blogs matter, this is it.

************************************************

Olimometer 2.52

This blog exists as a full-time endeavor thanks to your support. The only check I draw to pay for this coverage and all that is done is what you choose to provide.

For a full month I ask a fixed amount $1465, as of today we have $385 in the till. We need $65 a day every day for the rest of the month to make that goal.

If you think this coverage and what we do here is worth your support please consider hitting Datipjar below.

Naturally once our monthly goal is made these solicitations will disappear till the next month but once we get 61 more subscribers  at $20 a month the goal will be covered for a full year and this pitch will disappear until 2015.

Consider the lineup you get for this price, in addition to my own work seven days a week you get John Ruberry (Marathon Pundit)  on Sunday Pat Austin (And so it goes in Shreveport)  on Monday  Tim Imholt on Tuesday,  AP Dillon (Lady Liberty1885) Thursdays, Pastor George Kelly Fridays,   Steve Eggleston on Saturdays with  Baldilocks (Tue & Sat)  and   Fausta  (Wed & Fri) of (Fausta Blog) twice a week.

If that’s not worth $20 a month I’d like to know what is?