Readability

The Nerd Orgy Proof

Howard: Come on, are we gonna sit around chat­ting like a bunch of teenage girls, or are we gonna play D&D like a bunch of teenage boys who are never gonna have sex with those teenage girls?

The Big Bang The­ory The Love Spell Poten­tial 2013

Far be it from me to sug­gest that gay pedophiles are more com­mon or more dan­ger­ous than het­ero­sex­ual pedophiles.

Robert Stacy McCain March 19th 2014

Sat­ur­day I had an inter­est­ing argu­ment on twit­ter con­cern­ing the Catholic faith:

There is some kind of dis­pute in the dio­cese of Philly and the out­raged masses of the left were mak­ing demands of the arch­bishop. In response I gave a rather obvi­ous bit of snark:

This didn’t sit well with the peo­ple who were using hash­tag #catholic to attack catholics so I engaged them. As any­one who has ever engaged an anti-​catholic knows it doesn’t take long for an anti-​catholic in an argu­ment to play the child sex scan­dal card and this was no exception:

Now a lot of faith­ful peo­ple instantly go on defense when they see some­thing like this because to explain and acknowl­edge the Church’s sins while explain­ing the com­pre­hen­sive and rather effec­tive steps that have been taken over the last 10 years to both weed this out of the church and to pro­tect chil­dren are not con­ducive to 140 Characters.

Unfor­tu­nately all not answer­ing this does is leave a stain in the #catholic hash­tag line dis­cour­ag­ing the faith­ful and encour­ag­ing those who hate them so the best strat­egy is to counter that argu­ment with­out deny­ing or min­i­miz­ing a legit­i­mate scandal.

Unfor­tu­nately for our friends on the far left that’s REALLY easy:

Being that almost 4 in 5 of the priest abuse cases involved a priest and a boy it would seem rather obvi­ous that this scan­dal was one over­whelm­ing involv­ing Gay men. Since media has com­pletely ignored this fact when you bring it up you get amaz­ingly stu­pid argu­ments in response like this:

Got that being gay and becom­ing a priest who takes a vow of celibacy are mutu­ally exclu­sive. Appar­ently Scott believes gay men either by incli­na­tion or inabil­ity could never take such a vow. Sounds rather big­oted to me.

More impor­tantly that argu­ment has no poten­tial to per­suade even peo­ple who hate the church let alone the low info voter so that requires some­thing more ahem…cre­ative.

Got that sex with kids in an ori­en­ta­tion totally dif­fer­ent from straight or gays why it’s prac­ti­cally a 3rd gen­der. This oddly enough doesn’t tend to per­suade because the log­i­cal follow-​up is: How DARE peo­ple dis­crim­i­nate against indi­vid­u­als, cler­i­cal or oth­er­wise based on their ori­en­ta­tion of want­ing to have sex with kids?

That argu­ment while being advanced slowly in acad­e­mia hasn’t caught fire with the gen­eral pub­lic who despite the best efforts of cer­tain film­mak­ers some­how doesn’t cot­ton to the idea of chil­dren as sex objects.

Plus it’s also the type of thing that might give Stacy McCain another rea­son to use the term “Gay Pedophile” again.

So when that card falls flat what’s the next move?

After all in Amer­ica there is sim­ply no way for a per­son to pro­cure birth con­trol. Of course one might argue birth con­trol is not 100% effec­tive as that is the busi­ness model of Planned Par­ent­hood, but that still them hav­ing failed with the “They’re not really Gay” meme actu­ally mak­ing the argu­ment that straight men will sim­ply flip a switch for the sake of get­ting sex.

There is one con­clu­sive way to refute that laugh­able argu­ment: The Nerd Orgy proof.

The num­ber one com­edy in the coun­try is the Big Bang The­ory. This well-​earned posi­tion comes from a com­bi­na­tion of bril­liant writ­ing and act­ing based on a sim­ple for­mula that’s known to all.

It’s hard for male geeks and nerds to get laid.

From the very first episode

Leonard:Our babies will be smart and beautiful.

Shel­don:Not to men­tion imaginary.

To the 8th sea­son première.…

Howard: What’s wrong with your car?

Raj: I’m hav­ing my win­dows untinted.

Howard: Why.

Raj: I have a hot girl­friend now I want the haters to know.

…geeks can’t get laid” premise has been the series bread and but­ter and has made the entire cast rich.

Iron­i­cally while the pop­u­lar­ity of the series has made geek­dom less of a uni­sex propo­si­tion the fact is if you are a male who is a comic book, dun­geons and drag­ons, magic the gath­er­ing, star trek, star wars, doc­tor who or gam­ing geek your abil­ity to get laid by a girl is severely ham­pered as evi­denced by this story of an attempt to launch an orgy at a gam­ing event a few years ago:

I also appre­ci­ate the fact that the poster starts off with “I thought it might be fun,” an hon­est state­ment that leaves open the pos­si­bil­ity that it will instead be the most hor­ri­fy­ingly awk­ward night of many of the par­tic­i­pants’ lives. A small hotel room, filled with the sights, sounds, and smells of a group of peo­ple who’ve just spent hours sweat­ing their way around a crowded con­ven­tion show floor? Sign me up!

Or don’t. Seems like I’m no longer eli­gi­ble to apply, as I’m not up for sharing.

Update: Get­ting too many responses from sin­gle males, so will not be accept­ing any more for now. If you are a sin­gle male and you already replied, I need to see what we have for cou­ples and sin­gle females before you get an invite. No sin­gle males have an actual invite yet.

That’s just one of the many rea­sons a uni­sex orgy at a male-​dominated gam­ing event is a bad idea. I can list sev­eral oth­ers, but I’ve not eaten lunch yet.

So the ques­tion becomes, if the util­i­tar­ian argu­ment is cor­rect wouldn’t all these guys are all dying for sex why wouldn’t they under the util­i­tar­ian argu­ment sim­ply relieve their sex­ual ten­sion with other men?

And let’s go one step fur­ther, the Big Bang The­ory is deal­ing with men in their 20’s early 30’s. The aver­age gamer geek starts in their teens at an age where arousal is prac­ti­cally auto­matic. As Robert Stacy McCain once said

A teenage boy is capa­ble of sex­ual arousal with the least provo­ca­tion, or no provo­ca­tion at all.

I mean, you have a gath­er­ing of young men who are in a per­ma­nent state of arousal, gen­er­ally sex­u­ally frus­trated , rejected by women sur­rounded by a group of peo­ple in the same sit­u­a­tion who are accept­ing of him.

If peo­ple so eas­ily dropped their sex­ual ori­en­ta­tion based on con­ve­nience uni­sex Geek Orgies of straight men and boys should be so ubiq­ui­tous that the term would be known every­where describ­ing a phe­nom as well known as the premise of the Big Bang instead of the punch­line for this blog post.

Howard: Come on, are we gonna sit around chatting like a bunch of teenage girls, or are we gonna play D&D like a bunch of teenage boys who are never gonna have sex with those teenage girls?

The Big Bang Theory The Love Spell Potential 2013

Far be it from me to suggest that gay pedophiles are more common or more dangerous than heterosexual pedophiles.

Robert Stacy McCain March 19th 2014

Saturday I had an interesting argument on twitter concerning the Catholic faith:

There is some kind of dispute in the diocese of Philly and the outraged masses of the left were making demands of the archbishop.  In response I gave a rather obvious bit of snark:

This didn’t sit well with the people who were using hashtag #catholic to attack catholics so I engaged them. As anyone who has ever engaged an anti-catholic knows it doesn’t take long for an anti-catholic in an argument to play the child sex scandal card and this was no exception:

Now a lot of faithful people instantly go on defense when they see something like this because to explain and acknowledge the Church’s sins while explaining the comprehensive and rather effective steps that have been taken over the last 10 years to both weed this out of the church and to protect children are not conducive to 140 Characters.

Unfortunately all not answering this does is leave a stain in the #catholic hashtag line discouraging the faithful and encouraging those who hate them so the best strategy is to counter that argument without denying or minimizing a legitimate scandal.

Unfortunately for our friends on the far left that’s REALLY easy:

Being that almost 4 in 5 of the priest abuse cases involved a priest and a boy it would seem rather obvious that this scandal was one overwhelming involving Gay men.  Since media has completely ignored this fact when you bring it up you get amazingly stupid arguments in response like this:

Got that being gay and becoming a priest who takes a vow of celibacy are mutually exclusive.  Apparently Scott believes gay men either by inclination or inability could never take such a vow. Sounds rather bigoted to me.

More importantly that argument has no potential to persuade even people who hate the church let alone the low info voter so that requires something more ahem…creative.

Got that sex with kids in an orientation  totally different from straight or gays why it’s practically a 3rd gender.  This oddly enough doesn’t tend to persuade because the logical follow-up is:  How DARE people discriminate against individuals, clerical or otherwise based on their orientation of wanting to have sex with kids?

That argument while being advanced slowly in academia hasn’t caught fire with the general public who despite the best efforts of certain filmmakers somehow doesn’t cotton to the idea of children as sex objects.

Plus it’s also the type of thing that might give Stacy McCain another reason to use the term “Gay Pedophile” again.

So when that card falls flat what’s the next move?

After all in America there is simply no way for a person to procure birth control.  Of course one might argue birth control is not 100% effective as that is the business model of Planned Parenthood, but that still them having failed with the “They’re not really Gay” meme actually making the argument that straight men will simply flip a switch for the sake of getting sex.

There is one conclusive way to refute that laughable argument:  The Nerd Orgy proof.

The number one comedy in the country is the Big Bang Theory.  This well-earned position comes from a combination of brilliant writing and acting based on a simple formula that’s known to all.

It’s hard for male geeks and nerds to get laid.

From the very first episode

Leonard:Our babies will be smart and beautiful.

Sheldon:Not to mention imaginary.

To the 8th season premiere….

Howard:  What’s wrong with your car?

Raj:  I’m having my windows untinted.

Howard:  Why.

Raj:  I have a hot girlfriend now I want the haters to know.

…geeks can’t get laid” premise has been the series bread and butter and has made the entire cast rich.

Ironically while the popularity of the series has made geekdom less of a unisex proposition the fact is if you are a male who is a comic book, dungeons and dragons, magic the gathering, star trek, star wars, doctor who or gaming geek your ability to get laid by a girl is severely hampered as evidenced by this story of an attempt to launch an orgy at a gaming event a few years ago:

I also appreciate the fact that the poster starts off with “I thought it might be fun,” an honest statement that leaves open the possibility that it will instead be the most horrifyingly awkward night of many of the participants’ lives. A small hotel room, filled with the sights, sounds, and smells of a group of people who’ve just spent hours sweating their way around a crowded convention show floor? Sign me up!

Or don’t. Seems like I’m no longer eligible to apply, as I’m not up for sharing.

Update: Getting too many responses from single males, so will not be accepting any more for now. If you are a single male and you already replied, I need to see what we have for couples and single females before you get an invite. No single males have an actual invite yet.

That’s just one of the many reasons a unisex orgy at a male-dominated gaming event is a bad idea. I can list several others, but I’ve not eaten lunch yet.

So the question becomes, if the utilitarian argument is correct wouldn’t all these guys are all dying for sex why wouldn’t they under the utilitarian argument simply relieve their sexual tension with other men?

And let’s go one step further, the Big Bang Theory is dealing with men in their 20’s early 30’s.  The average gamer geek starts in their teens at an age where arousal is practically automatic.  As Robert Stacy McCain once said 

A teenage boy is capable of sexual arousal with the least provocation, or no provocation at all.

I mean, you have a gathering of young men who are in a permanent state of arousal, generally sexually frustrated , rejected by women surrounded by a group of people in the same situation who are accepting of him.

If people so easily dropped their sexual orientation based on convenience unisex Geek Orgies of straight men and boys should be so ubiquitous that the term would be known everywhere describing a phenom as well known as the premise of the Big Bang instead of the punchline for this blog post.