The Dogs of the Left are Still not Barking

The incest taboo can be destroyed only by destroying the nuclear family as the primary institution of the culture. The nuclear family is the school of values in a sexist, sexually repressed society.

Andrea Dworkin Woman hating 1974

Over the next few years you are going to be branded as bigots, hated and derided. You will be portrayed in every form of culture, plays, TV series and movies as people to be shunned and no member of the media fill fail to come after you for your offenses against the twin sacraments of Abortion & Gay Marriage.

DaTechGuy March 29th 2013

One of the most telling pieces I ever read came from Dave Weigel a few years ago:

Above, you’ll find a short video composed of the floor speeches some top Democrats made about SSM. At the time, Republicans wanted to block gay marriage in Massachusetts by amending the constitution with an official marriage definition. Democrats argued against that, but they didn’t argue in favor of gay marriage. They argued that DOMA made such an amendment unneccessary. They assured people like Rick Santorum that the slippery slope case for gay marriage was bogus.

The new Democratic advocates for SSM fall into two camps. The first consists of people who always liked the idea of this but worried about losing national elections. In his memoir, Democratic consultant Bob Shrum remembers John Kerry fretting that the Massachusetts Supreme Court had forced Democrats to talk about gay marriage before they were ready to. “Why couldn’t they just wait a year?” he asked Shrum, mournfully. The second camp consists of people who really do oppose the idea of gay people getting married. Republicans argued that this second camp was tiny, and that liberals were hiding behind it. They were right!

Now of course many of these same people are happy to argue that a person who thinks otherwise doesn’t deserve a job either as a fire chief or a tenured professor.

The ICK factor is moving, as I said seven years ago:

The Gay marriage movement has all the trimmings of both a pop fad and a political movement by a loud group of elite people with money and clout; no different than the eugenics movements in the last century. I suspect beyond the core set of true believers the support is actually very thin. It is what the “enlightened” and “right” type of people support to show how good and tolerant they are. It allows people to feel good about themselves without actually doing anything. It keep them safe from that most dreaded charge of bigotry. In short it is an exercise in narcissism.

This is why, in my opinion so much effort is being made to compel compliance because without such compulsion it will simply melt away.

But that’s not what I’m here to write about.

Three years ago a piece in Gawker defended those who desire sex with children, I noted how the argument mirrored those that were being made on gay marriage a few years back and said:

if I was a supporter of Gay Marriage with even the slightest knowledge of the history of the Gay Movement and I read the arguments in the Gawker article (you can almost hear the cry of “Bigot” to those would disagree with the author) I wouldn’t just be insulted, I’d be furious.

However no such argument came and the march of the ICK factor continued on unabated from teachers arguing for sex with students for the NYT just a few months back arguing for Pedophelia as a disorder and ending the exclusion of such people from the Americans with disability act

And even with the potential of a story involving the Royal family, Bill Clinton and underage girls,  the MSM hasn’t gone 24/7 on it as they did with Chris Christie and the closing of an exit off a highway.

What does all of this come down to?  Just this.

I submit and suggest that the lack of outrage here, just like in the Roman Polanski case, the Woody Allen case is because the media is quite aware of the scope of this within the ranks of the rich and powerful who support them with their campaign contribution and will stay as silent as possible.

And I further suggest that this is the same reason why, as Stacy McCain noted, Non Christian Clergy 

The liberal media generally ignore sex scandals unless they involve a Republican politician or a Catholic priest, so maybe you didn’t hear about Mohammad Abdullah Saleem, the Illinois imam who allegedly perpetrated “decades of assault and child sex abuse . . . within the community of Indian and Pakistani Muslim immigrants.”

Not only will our liberal media and democrats ignore these things I further predict that the same Democrats and liberals who pretended to be upset at the very idea that they supported Gay Marriage in 1995 will as soon as the culture allow will find creative and seemingly plausible reasons to argue for a change in how such cases are handled by the law, particularly if they get a chance to move the courts farther in that direction with another 4 to eight years in the White House.   Baring accident or infirmity I’m going to live to see this happen.

This prediction is going to insult a lot of people, but given the history of the last 30 years I can’t see how any rational person can conclude otherwise.

On the bright side If I live to see 90 I predict I’ll see all of this fall apart just as the eugenics movement died after a generation or two, and once this happens suddenly we’ll be told by those same people who led the charge that they were with us all the time.

Remember these words from eject eject eject

You see, I know something critical about this iceberg out in front of us, and that is this: that iceberg is hollow. It’s hollow.

Even the people who believe in it most strongly know it’s a lie. That’s why they have to lie to you about what they believe. They know, in their heart of hearts, that this philosophy has been the ruin of civilization in every one of the countless times it has been applied. They know – consciously or not – that in the last century alone their ideas have cost the lives of no less than 150 million people executed, or starved to death, to bring this paradise to earth.