Iran Deal, and Name Calling in Politics is the New Normal

Readability

Iran Deal, and Name Calling in Politics is the New Normal

Nuclear ExplosionAs I grow older I have noticed that the world around me has changed. This is not unusual; change is the one con­stant in life.

One of those changes has been a grad­ual shift in pol­i­tics to pure name call­ing and lack of, let’s just say, hon­esty with politi­cians. But, it isn’t just them. We elect them, there­fore, isn’t the vot­ing pub­lic at fault? Well, that is a philo­soph­i­cal ques­tion for another day, but applic­a­ble to this par­tic­u­lar discussion.

As a nation, like it or not, we are about to enter into an agree­ment with the Ira­ni­ans per­tain­ing to their nuclear agree­ment. As a part of this “deal” Iran will obtain nuclear weapons. It is going to happen.

Who cares if another Nation has these weapons? After all, there are other nuclear pow­ers which includ­ing the following:

  • The United States
  • Rus­sia
  • The United Kingdom
  • France
  • China
  • India
  • Pak­istan
  • North Korea
  • Israel

At least these are the known ones.

What’s one more?

The dif­fer­ence here is that Iran is spend­ing loads of money sup­port­ing ter­ror­ist groups and their tac­tics and has also declared what they would do with these weapons should they have them.

Now, I know, some­one is going to say, “Ohhhh those crazy Ira­ni­ans are just say­ing that to make their cit­i­zens happy, they really won’t use them.”

Ummm, ok. Maybe, but maybe not.

Per­son­ally, I am well aware that there are con­ven­tional weapons now that offer up the same yield as a nuclear device. All one has to do is look at the MOAB for this sort of behav­ior. Google MOAB some­time and see the videos on YouTube. It is a con­ven­tional device with as much explo­sive power as the Hiroshima Bomb.

Back to the Ira­ni­ans and name calling.

I have entered into a dis­cus­sion with peo­ple about this deal. I have often been called names because I wasn’t 100% on board with the Pres­i­dent and Sec­re­tary Kerry. Fine, call me names who cares. But I think it speaks vol­umes of where we are in this national politically.

If we can’t have a dia­log for more than 2 min­utes offer­ing up con­cepts and ideas and back­ing those up with one another with­out being called names because I don’t instantly agree with you, well that isn’t going to offer up viable solu­tions now is it? If you keep putting down a person’s Idea long enough just because it does not fol­low along your party lines, soon you will get no ideas from other per­sons you are in fact request­ing alter­na­tive ideas from.

Think of it kind of like incest. One gen­er­a­tion down maybe noth­ing weird hap­pens but some­times you get Geof­fry from Game of Thrones.

The only other thing that hap­pens when I dis­cuss this Iran­ian deal is dis­cussed in my expe­ri­ence is the ques­tion “What’s the alter­na­tive, no deal? War?”

Think of it like buy­ing a car. Would you spend Mer­cedes Money on a Hyundai? No that’s a bad deal. So most peo­ple would walk away.

Yes, no deal is fine in that case, and with the Ira­ni­ans. It is ok some­times to walk away.

But not when it comes to pol­i­tics. There we just need a deal we can go on the news and say look we got a deal. Yeah, but it sucks. How­ever, that isn’t on the news, but let that go.

Don’t believe me?

A for­mer com­bat medic and I wrote a book recently called The Last World War (Avail­able on Ama­zon in eBook and Print).This book was writ­ten by myself (usu­ally a con­ser­v­a­tive guy) and a Texan, gun tot­ing, for­mer com­bat medic with two tours in South­west Asia (includ­ing com­bat duty). I assure this par­tic­u­lar part of a review made us laugh:

PC Pajama Boys write and AH/​Future His­tory Book? Is this what we have come to? Left Wing Obama Boys are now writ­ing in this genre?”

Well let’s see, nei­ther of us are fans of the Pres­i­dent, nei­ther of us voted for him, not that it mat­ters. The review went on to basi­cally indi­cate some­thing that we thought care­fully about before writ­ing the book (which has other very com­pli­men­tary, 5 star reviews btw).

The issue with this per­son was that if we are nuked by Iran the United States would respond (in his opin­ion) by turn­ing Iran into a park­ing lot for a mas­sive glass factory.

Well, I for one am not so sure.

Let’s look at the first few peo­ple in that loop. Pres­i­dent Obama? Would he nuke back? If Iran had used all of its nuclear weapons and there were no other attacks immi­nent would he launch nuclear weapons? I don’t’ think so. He would more likely go on TV and demand calm while there was a “detailed inves­ti­ga­tion to deter­mine who was really behind the nuclear attack.”

Let’s say Pres­i­dent Obama was not the Pres­i­dent for some rea­son (which hap­pens in the book) and Vice Pres­i­dent Biden is the Pres­i­dent? Would he under those cir­cum­stances? I don’t think so either. Vice Pres­i­dent Biden would roll his eyes, throw his hands up and look like a shifty used car salesman.

How about Speaker of the House? I know he wouldn’t. He’d cry, but not launch nukes.

The book is fic­tional, but the response by those who chose to not rate it well has all been polit­i­cally based. Because appar­ently we have got­ten to the point as a nation where two vet­er­ans who write FIC­TION nov­els are now accused of pol­i­tics we don’t hold based on what may hap­pen once Iran gets nuclear weapons if we assume the spinal for­ti­tude of those who run our coun­try to be what we have expe­ri­enced it to be.

Now, per­son­ally, I am of the belief that nuclear weapons will be used again in anger. There will be more tests, and there will, almost with­out a doubt, be an attack using one at some point in the not so dis­tant future. I leave it to oth­ers to decide what will hap­pen when that occurs, but I believe what we have writ­ten was what would hap­pen based on those in charge today. It would not be a nuclear response on our part. It would be con­ven­tional, and our con­ven­tional troops are the best in the world, and in my opin­ion, would be dom­i­nant as they always are.

I would like to con­clude today by ask­ing that every­one be more patient. Exchange ideas with those we dis­agree with, have the dis­cus­sion. Lis­ten to their opin­ion; ask them why they believe what they believe. If their rea­son why is rea­son­able to you per­haps you will change your mind. If it is not, well then you know where the flaw in their think­ing is and (key word here) politely point out your why on that same sub­ject, you might just get a convert.

I know some­one is going to say, “Yeah well they won’t lis­ten,” well no. Not at first and cer­tainly not if you don’t try, but the exchange of ideas is what adults should do. We should not have name call­ing, espe­cially by our elected lead­ers who use the nightly news I’m stuck watch­ing to tell me how awful the other guy is, but never get around to say­ing what they would do, merely how bad that other guy is.

To the guy who wrote that review, thanks for read­ing the book, I appre­ci­ate you tak­ing some time, but I assure you your review will not go into the annals of his­tory as one we care much about as you admit in it that you stopped read­ing before the halfway point. Next time, review books you fin­ished and not those you decided who I was and what I was before you both­ered to look into the mat­ter. Never, ever jump to a con­clu­sion. Thanks!

We leave you with this thought. The next time we get upset with the ways those that lead this coun­try behave, we have no one but our­selves to blame. We need to find the right guy, not the most “elec­table,” find the right guy and work hard to get that guy into office. Don’t let any­one tell you it can’t be done. I’m sure some­one told that to a guy named Wash­ing­ton a long time ago.

Thanks for read­ing the post, and for those who have read and enjoyed my var­i­ous works of fic­tion, I am hum­bled by you tak­ing the time to enjoy that work. It is an honor to have fans.

Nuclear ExplosionAs I grow older I have noticed that the world around me has changed. This is not unusual; change is the one constant in life.

One of those changes has been a gradual shift in politics to pure name calling and lack of, let’s just say, honesty with politicians. But, it isn’t just them. We elect them, therefore, isn’t the voting public at fault? Well, that is a philosophical question for another day, but applicable to this particular discussion.

As a nation, like it or not, we are about to enter into an agreement with the Iranians pertaining to their nuclear agreement. As a part of this “deal” Iran will obtain nuclear weapons. It is going to happen.

Who cares if another Nation has these weapons? After all, there are other nuclear powers which including the following:

  • The United States
  • Russia
  • The United Kingdom
  • France
  • China
  • India
  • Pakistan
  • North Korea
  • Israel

At least these are the known ones.

What’s one more?

The difference here is that Iran is spending loads of money supporting terrorist groups and their tactics and has also declared what they would do with these weapons should they have them.

Now, I know, someone is going to say, “Ohhhh those crazy Iranians are just saying that to make their citizens happy, they really won’t use them.”

Ummm, ok. Maybe, but maybe not.

Personally, I am well aware that there are conventional weapons now that offer up the same yield as a nuclear device. All one has to do is look at the MOAB for this sort of behavior. Google MOAB sometime and see the videos on YouTube. It is a conventional device with as much explosive power as the Hiroshima Bomb.

Back to the Iranians and name calling.

I have entered into a discussion with people about this deal. I have often been called names because I wasn’t 100% on board with the President and Secretary Kerry. Fine, call me names who cares. But I think it speaks volumes of where we are in this national politically.

If we can’t have a dialog for more than 2 minutes offering up concepts and ideas and backing those up with one another without being called names because I don’t instantly agree with you, well that isn’t going to offer up viable solutions now is it? If you keep putting down a person’s Idea long enough just because it does not follow along your party lines, soon you will get no ideas from other persons you are in fact requesting alternative ideas from.

Think of it kind of like incest. One generation down maybe nothing weird happens but sometimes you get Geoffry from Game of Thrones.

The only other thing that happens when I discuss this Iranian deal is discussed in my experience is the question “What’s the alternative, no deal? War?”

Think of it like buying a car. Would you spend Mercedes Money on a Hyundai? No that’s a bad deal. So most people would walk away.

Yes, no deal is fine in that case, and with the Iranians. It is ok sometimes to walk away.

But not when it comes to politics. There we just need a deal we can go on the news and say look we got a deal. Yeah, but it sucks. However, that isn’t on the news, but let that go.

Don’t believe me?

A former combat medic and I wrote a book recently called The Last World War (Available on Amazon in eBook and Print).This book was written by myself (usually a conservative guy) and a Texan, gun toting, former combat medic with two tours in Southwest Asia (including combat duty). I assure this particular part of a review made us laugh:

PC Pajama Boys write and AH/Future History Book? Is this what we have come to? Left Wing Obama Boys are now writing in this genre?”

Well let’s see, neither of us are fans of the President, neither of us voted for him, not that it matters. The review went on to basically indicate something that we thought carefully about before writing the book (which has other very complimentary, 5 star reviews btw).

The issue with this person was that if we are nuked by Iran the United States would respond (in his opinion) by turning Iran into a parking lot for a massive glass factory.

Well, I for one am not so sure.

Let’s look at the first few people in that loop. President Obama? Would he nuke back? If Iran had used all of its nuclear weapons and there were no other attacks imminent would he launch nuclear weapons? I don’t’ think so. He would more likely go on TV and demand calm while there was a “detailed investigation to determine who was really behind the nuclear attack.”

Let’s say President Obama was not the President for some reason (which happens in the book) and Vice President Biden is the President? Would he under those circumstances? I don’t think so either. Vice President Biden would roll his eyes, throw his hands up and look like a shifty used car salesman.

How about Speaker of the House? I know he wouldn’t. He’d cry, but not launch nukes.

The book is fictional, but the response by those who chose to not rate it well has all been politically based. Because apparently we have gotten to the point as a nation where two veterans who write FICTION novels are now accused of politics we don’t hold based on what may happen once Iran gets nuclear weapons if we assume the spinal fortitude of those who run our country to be what we have experienced it to be.

Now, personally, I am of the belief that nuclear weapons will be used again in anger. There will be more tests, and there will, almost without a doubt, be an attack using one at some point in the not so distant future. I leave it to others to decide what will happen when that occurs, but I believe what we have written was what would happen based on those in charge today. It would not be a nuclear response on our part. It would be conventional, and our conventional troops are the best in the world, and in my opinion, would be dominant as they always are.

I would like to conclude today by asking that everyone be more patient. Exchange ideas with those we disagree with, have the discussion. Listen to their opinion; ask them why they believe what they believe. If their reason why is reasonable to you perhaps you will change your mind. If it is not, well then you know where the flaw in their thinking is and (key word here) politely point out your why on that same subject, you might just get a convert.

I know someone is going to say, “Yeah well they won’t listen,” well no. Not at first and certainly not if you don’t try, but the exchange of ideas is what adults should do. We should not have name calling, especially by our elected leaders who use the nightly news I’m stuck watching to tell me how awful the other guy is, but never get around to saying what they would do, merely how bad that other guy is.

To the guy who wrote that review, thanks for reading the book, I appreciate you taking some time, but I assure you your review will not go into the annals of history as one we care much about as you admit in it that you stopped reading before the halfway point. Next time, review books you finished and not those you decided who I was and what I was before you bothered to look into the matter. Never, ever jump to a conclusion. Thanks!

We leave you with this thought. The next time we get upset with the ways those that lead this country behave, we have no one but ourselves to blame. We need to find the right guy, not the most “electable,” find the right guy and work hard to get that guy into office. Don’t let anyone tell you it can’t be done. I’m sure someone told that to a guy named Washington a long time ago.

Thanks for reading the post, and for those who have read and enjoyed my various works of fiction, I am humbled by you taking the time to enjoy that work. It is an honor to have fans.