You might have caught Hillary Clinton Bashing members of the GOP concerning their positions on abortion.

You can see why Hillary Clinton and the left would have this opinion after all who would support someone who keeps a woman pregnant like this:

Instead of resolving the problems of the poor and thinking of how the world can be different, some can only propose a reduction in the birth rate. At times, developing countries face forms of international pressure which make economic assistance contingent on certain policies of “reproductive health”.

or daring to equate the unborn to the born.

When we fail to acknowledge as part of reality the worth of a poor person, a human embryo, a person with disabilities – to offer just a few examples – it becomes difficult to hear the cry of nature itself; everything is connected.

and this

Since everything is interrelated, concern for the protection of nature is also incompatible with the justification of abortion. How can we genuinely teach the importance of concern for other vulnerable beings, however troublesome or inconvenient they may be, if we fail to protect a human embryo, even when its presence is uncomfortable and creates difficulties? “If personal and social sensitivity towards the acceptance of the new life is lost, then other forms of acceptance that are valuable for society also wither away”

Or these people who want to deny science

On the other hand, it is troubling that, when some ecological movements defend the integrity of the environment, rightly demanding that certain limits be imposed on scientific research, they sometimes fail to apply those same principles to human life. There is a tendency to justify transgressing all boundaries when experimentation is carried out on living human embryos.

You can’t expect democrats to be nice to republicans who say outrageous things like this.

Except the author of those quotes aren’t a Republican candidate or campaign, the author is Pope Francis, and they are not from any Republican platform or position paper they are from Laudito Si’ the Paper that Hillary loved so much.

This suggestion is evergreen:

The answer and the tactic is such a “gimmie” that I’m almost embarrassed to have to explain it. It’s really simple:

Any Candidate who is asked about Laudato Si’ should instantly say that if they are elected they would immediately finance research on Global warming by diverting funds earmarked for Planned Parenthood, Research using Human Embryos and any international family planning program that the government is funding.

Furthermore the very day the Pope speaks such a bill should be ready to submit on the floor of the house and moved forward to force Democrats in the Senate to filibuster it or if they fear to do so to force the President to either sign it or veto it.

Every time Hillary talks about defending Planned Parenthood as “extreme” she is calling Pope Francis extreme. Every time Hillary and company compare those defending life from conception to natural death to ISIS she is comparing Pope Francis and every Catholic who follows the faith to ISIS. And conservatives should call her any every Democrat out there on it.


The only way I can keep doing this full time is if my pay comes from you. My annual goal is Twenty Two grand which will give me a nominal living doing this.

But I have to take things as they are so if you like what you see here including my paid writers like Tim Imholt, Fausta Wertz, Pat Austin et/al and have a little extra you can spare.  I’d appreciate it if you would hit DaTipJar

Olimometer 2.52

That gets all the bills paid. If I can get to Forty Thousand I can afford to travel outside of New England and/or hire more blogger to help me get it done.

Consider Subscribing 100 Subscribers at $20 a month will get the job done and then some.

Choose a Subscription level

Additionally our subscribers get our podcast emailed directly to them before it show up anywhere else.

If you could kick in I’d really appreciate it.