Media Math on Orlando

Readability

Media Math on Orlando

My para­mount object in this strug­gle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slav­ery. If I could save the Union with­out free­ing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by free­ing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by free­ing some and leav­ing oth­ers alone I would also do that.

Abe Lin­coln

Yes­ter­day I talked about the math that explains the Demo­c­rat Party’s deci­sion to ignore the dri­ver for the Orlando attack, that is Islamic Terror

The ques­tion then becomes: Why is the media treat­ing this as a “too many guns issue”.

One might think the log­i­cal con­clu­sion is the MSM is an exten­sion of the Demo­c­rat party and reports news accord­ingly as explained by RS McCain not­ing another recent crime tar­get­ing gays that’s been under­re­ported:

Do you think CNN or the New York Times will notice a crime like this? No, of course not, because the per­pe­tra­tors are black and the les­bian who got assaulted is white, and there­fore it’s strictly local news.
The same prin­ci­ple explains why, when a blood­thirsty Mus­lim fanatic kills 49 peo­ple in Orlando, it’s not a story about the dan­ger posed by blood­thirsty Mus­lim fanatic. Instead it’s an excuse to lec­ture Amer­i­cans about how much we hate gay peo­ple. The prin­ci­ple that deter­mines how the media cov­ers such sto­ries is always the same: “How can we report this in a way that helps the Demo­c­rat Party?”

It is the last sen­tence of his argu­ment that is most rel­e­vant and the proof of this comes via a Ras­mussen poll linked by Ann Alt­house

“Among vot­ers who con­sider the mass mur­ders in Orlando, Florida this past week­end pri­mar­ily a ter­ror­ist attack, Trump leads Clin­ton 64% to 16%.“
“Clin­ton posts an 83% to four per­cent (4%) lead among those who see the killings as chiefly a gun con­trol issue.…”

If these num­bers are cor­rect then for the MSM to be suc­cess­ful in their attempt to aid and abet a Demo­c­rat vic­tory in the fall it not only becomes nec­es­sary for the MSM to make the Jihadist attack by a reg­is­tered gay demo­c­rat a gun con­trol issue but it becomes vital that any indi­ca­tion that this was indeed a ter­ror strike against Amer­ica in gen­eral and the gay com­mu­nity in par­tic­u­lar be quashed.

Remem­ber the para­mount object for the media is to elect demo­c­rat and not to report on islamic ter­ror or anti-​gay vio­lence. If they could elect democ­rats by report­ing on islamic ter­ror & anti-​gay vio­lence, they would do so. If they can elec­tion democ­rats by ignor­ing anti-​gay vio­lence and islamic ter­ror they will do that, an if they can elect democ­rats by report­ing on some anti-​gay vio­lence and islamic ter­ror attacks while ignor­ing oth­ers they will do that too.


I’d like to think we do good work here If you’d like to help us keep up the pace please con­sider hit­ting DaTipJar




[olimome­ter id=3]

Please con­sider Sub­scrib­ing. If less than 13 of 1% of our read­ers sub­scribed at $10 a month we’d have the 114.5 sub­scribers needed to our annual goal all year with­out solicitation.

Plus of course all sub­scribers get my weekly pod­cast emailed directly to you before it goes up any­where else.


Choose a Sub­scrip­tion level



My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that.

Abe Lincoln

Yesterday I talked about the math that explains the Democrat Party’s decision to ignore the driver for the Orlando attack, that is Islamic Terror

The question then becomes: Why is the media treating this as a “too many guns issue”.

One might think the logical conclusion is the MSM is an extension of the Democrat party and reports news accordingly as explained by RS McCain noting another recent crime targeting gays that’s been underreported:

Do you think CNN or the New York Times will notice a crime like this? No, of course not, because the perpetrators are black and the lesbian who got assaulted is white, and therefore it’s strictly local news.
The same principle explains why, when a bloodthirsty Muslim fanatic kills 49 people in Orlando, it’s not a story about the danger posed by bloodthirsty Muslim fanatic. Instead it’s an excuse to lecture Americans about how much we hate gay people. The principle that determines how the media covers such stories is always the same: “How can we report this in a way that helps the Democrat Party?”

It is the last sentence of his argument that is most relevant and the proof of this comes via a Rasmussen poll linked by Ann Althouse

“Among voters who consider the mass murders in Orlando, Florida this past weekend primarily a terrorist attack, Trump leads Clinton 64% to 16%.”
“Clinton posts an 83% to four percent (4%) lead among those who see the killings as chiefly a gun control issue….”

If these numbers are correct then for the MSM to be successful in their attempt to aid and abet a Democrat victory in the fall it not only becomes necessary for the MSM to make the Jihadist attack by a registered gay democrat a gun control issue but it becomes vital that any indication that this was indeed a terror strike against America in general and the gay community in particular be quashed.

Remember the paramount object for the media is to elect democrat and not to report on islamic terror or anti-gay violence.  If they could elect democrats by reporting on islamic terror & anti-gay violence, they would do so.  If they can election democrats by ignoring anti-gay violence and islamic terror they will do that, an if they can elect democrats by reporting on some anti-gay violence and islamic terror attacks while ignoring others they will do that too.


I’d like to think we do good work here If you’d like to help us keep up the pace please consider hitting DaTipJar




Olimometer 2.52

Please consider Subscribing. If less than 1/3 of 1% of our readers subscribed at $10 a month we’d have the 114.5 subscribers needed to our annual goal all year without solicitation.

Plus of course all subscribers get my weekly podcast emailed directly to you before it goes up anywhere else.


Choose a Subscription level