Every single Person participating in said sit in is of the same political party as the Orlando shooter and like said shooter “likes Hillary Clinton” or in Mr. Mateen’s case “liked”

That is all.

Update: Via Insty and of course Iowahawk

The following is a rant. Proceed accordingly.

Sterling Cooper Draper Pryce is back in the news,  years after Mad Men ended, thanks to Donald Trump:

Donald Trump and the Mystery of His ‘Mad Men’ Ad Agency

Donald Trump’s latest campaign finance filing contains the names of dozens of companies that were paid for services, but one really stands out: Draper Sterling, a play on the name of the fictional ad agency from the cable TV series “Mad Men.”

The firm that collected $35,000 from Trump for “web advertising” in late April isn’t headquartered in Madison Avenue offices filled with mid-century modern furniture and stylish secretaries; it traces back to a private home in suburban New Hampshire that’s about a 15-minute drive from the home of ousted Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski.

The people behind “Draper Sterling” are hiding behind non-disclosure agreements, at least for now.

Excuse my cynicism, but, if you don’t want to raise red flags about your campaign, naming an ad agency founded by two of your former consultants Draper Sterling is not the brightest idea.

Catchy as the Draper Sterling story is, with (as always seems to be the case with Trump-related stories) its TV-showbiz slant, the more interesting part is that the Trump campaign is a con job:

The celebrity demagogue who delights in telling crowds that he is “very, very rich” is presiding over a Ponzi‑scheme‑like presidential campaign that — even as it has paid his own businesses millions of dollars — has just $1.3 million cash in hand.

$1.3 million puts it below  – forget real estate at Trump Tower in Miami or New York – the Reading Rainbow Kickstarter and the Gosnell Movie Indiegogo.

20% of Donald Trump’s campaign spending goes to Trump businesses:

And, about the billionaire,

Could somebody explain to me how on earth is it legal for a campaign to disburse “in kind” payments to its own candidate? “In kind” for what, campaigning??

Seeing that campaign finance reports show less than $1.3 million in the bank heading into June, Trump himself admits,

“I’m having more difficulty, frankly, with some of the people in the party,”

No kidding!

The real price of the Trump campaign is what Roger Kimball outlined almost a year ago,

Notwithstanding Trump’s anointment as the “presumptive Republican nominee,” I continue to abide by my speculations of last July:

  1. Trump is unlikely to be the Republican nominee;

  2. If he is the nominee, he is very likely to lose the election;

  3. Trump has tapped into a vein of disillusionment and anger that the political establishment, Republican every bit as much as Democratic, would prefer to deny or at least ignore;

  4. That disillusionment and anger is likely to have profound electoral consequences in November.

I can’t forecast what comes next; in fact, as I was researching this post, I sat in complete bafflement as I contemplated that the two major political parties’ candidates are a woman under FBI investigation and a con man.

All I can safely do, for now, is to agree with Roger when he says, “the oddity of this campaign season is not over.”

Not over, by a long shot.

Fausta Rodriguez Wertz writes on U.S, and Latin American politics, news, and culture at Fausta’s Blog.


Pete’s reporting from the trenches, so please make sure to hit Da Tip Jar and subscribe!

 





Olimometer 2.52

Consider Subscribing. All subscribers get my weekly podcast emailed directly to you before it goes up anywhere else.

If less than 1/3 of 1% of our readers subscribed at $10 a month we’d have the 114.5 subscribers needed to our annual goal all year without solicitation.

If we can somehow double our annual goal then I would be a position to cover national events without requiring the sponsorship of the groups putting them on to attend.


Choose a Subscription level



Cardinal Borusa: As I believe I told you long ago, Doctor, you will never amount to anything in the galaxy while you retain your propensity for vulgar facetiousness.

Doctor Who: The Deadly Assassin 1976

As you, dear reader might have noticed I have an odd and occasionally twisted sense of humor that has its roots in a combination of the Three Stooges, Monty Python, augmented with a bit of the Marx brothers, 60’s TV military humor (F Troop & McHale’s Navy and Hogan’s Heroes) and assorted British Humor (Black Adder, Yes Minister, Red Dwarf) for good measure.  This sense is occasionally wildly inappropriate & even bordering on a violation of the 2nd Commandment requiring confession although I insist that God has a sense of humor evidenced by his creation of man).

What you may not know is that it occasionally takes a large amount of effort to resist deploying that humor either verbally or physical when such things occur to me on the spur of the moment.  One such moment took place at the during the CIS event at the National Press Club.

During a rather excellent presentation I found the call of nature stronger than the pull of Mark’s presentation and had to excuse myself hurriedly to the rest room, arriving there I found the men’s room was being cleaned and at the time I did not know the location of the alternative.

That’s when it hit me.

I was in Washington DC, a bastion of ultra liberalism, furthermore I was in the national press club and organization whose members have adopted liberal identity politics even to the point of the absurdity that if one does not accept the far left’s meme on the Transgender bathroom business you were a bigot, practically an unperson.

What would happen if instead of asking one of the very friendly staff of the press club I simply used the ladies room?

How would the press club react?  How COULD they react?  Surely the fact that I wearing a fedora , dressed in a suit and tie and clearly had not shaved (I forgot to pack razors) had no bearing on my sexual identity?  In fact those members of the press club unfamiliar with Doctor Who in general and the Fourth Doctor in particular might have decided my long multi colored scarf  (known as a  “doctor who” scarf) was a sign of membership or at least affinity in the LGBT community.

After all there are many events at the press club, many highly populated by liberals, what would a liberal woman say seeing me in the ladies room?
Would she dare question me, confront me, or even give me an odd look? Would she dare say a word to the people in charge?  Or would the fear of being accused of a proper lack of diversity drive her to silence?  She might find herself ashamed at even thinking such a thing and instead brag to her friends how accepting it was for her to be “comfortable” with a 270 man in the ladies room with her. Accommodating me was the ultimate in virtue signaling and if she was a proper liberal, particularly a liberal reporter tell the story with pride to everyone she knew.

On the other hand what if she DID report me?

Would the staff dare confront me? What would they say if I refused to give an explanation?  What would they do if they asked me my sexual orientation and I told them it was bluntly that not only was it none of their bus but how DARE they even question me upon it?  How would such a story play in the very papers where the member of that press club excoriate those who insist that there is in fact such a thing as men and women and act accordingly? Would they risk being seen as on the wrong side of an issue that the Democrat party is playing for all it is worth?

The comic potential for this decision was seemingly limitless!

Alas it was not to be, my comedic nature was overcome by my sense of prosperity, particularly as an invited guest and instead I asked someone where the other men’s room was and went there.

But I can’t help but think that it would be an interesting experiment, not only at the press club but at any liberal institution to see what might happen in that situation.

It would be fun to find out wouldn’t it, but it will take someone less invested in proprietary to do so.


While CIS kindly sponsored my attendance at their event there are still quite a few incidental expenses involved, not the least of which was the loss of two days pay from my regular job (my thanks to them BTW for permitting me the time off to accept CIS’ invitation)

Additionally and as you might have noticed with 2016 nearly 50% complete our annual goal for DaTipJar is only at 19.6%

If you like the interviews you see here over the next day or two and the work done here by me and my magnificent seven bloggers in general please consider hitting DaTipJar




Olimometer 2.52

Consider Subscribing. All subscribers get my weekly podcast emailed directly to you before it goes up anywhere else.

If less than 1/3 of 1% of our readers subscribed at $10 a month we’d have the 114.5 subscribers needed to our annual goal all year without solicitation.

If we can somehow double our annual goal then I would be a position to cover national events without requiring the sponsorship of the groups putting them on to attend.


Choose a Subscription level



Until that day if you are an organization or individual who likes the coverage / interviews you see here and wish to sponsor me to cover your / an event anywhere in the nation you can contact me here.