Charter Schools and the The Ghastly Patronage math Fighting them.

Readability

Charter Schools and the The Ghastly Patronage math Fighting them.

One of the things that has con­fused me quite a bit in the bat­tle for char­ter school both in gen­eral and here in Mass­a­chu­setts per ques­tion 2 is the math behind the opposition.

As a rule the vot­ers who tend so sup­port char­ter schools the most are the very poor vot­ers whose chil­dren are trapped in fail­ing schools that many of the oppo­nents of char­ter schools have failed to serve.

And while the Teach­ers unions are almost com­pletely united against char­ter schools many indi­vid­ual teach­ers are not all that pleased with their unions deci­sions and when given the chance to aban­don the unions as they were in Wis­con­sin, left them in drove.

This would indi­cate a giant con­tra­dic­tion, one would think that rather than oppos­ing and jeop­ar­diz­ing one’s base, one would embrace them, addi­tion­ally sim­ple math will tell you that even if the teach­ers were united against char­ter schools the num­ber of stu­dents and par­ents would ben­e­fit from them vastly out­num­bers them, after all every kid that goes to a char­ter school is one less added to an exist­ing classroom.

So why are so many lead­ers will­ing to fight against them? the Answer comes from some fig­ures con­cern­ing stu­dents teach­ers and bureau­crats put together by Ben Scafidi of Ken­ne­saw State University.

staffing-1992-2014
Yes you are see­ing that right, since 1992 staffing has increased at a rate nearly dou­ble as stu­dents and even more incred­i­bly admin­is­tra­tion has increased at an even greater rate than teachers.

Now one might argue that the increase in teach­ers is a good thing as it would result in smaller class sizes but can you really argue that we schools needed that incred­i­ble increase in administrators?

and what does that kind of increase in admin­is­tra­tion beyond the increase in stu­dent cost?

what-if-national

That’s an awful lot of money being spent that to pro­vide jobs for bureaucrats.

As far as Mass­a­chu­setts goes, here are the number

ma-chart

the Num­bers of teach­ers has increased at a rate 100% higher than then num­ber of stu­dents, But as you can see the num­ber of school admin­is­tra­tors by a rate 150% more than the increase in students.

How much did all those admin­is­tra­tors cost Massachusetts?

ma-savings

Now you might say “but dat­e­chguy, hasn’t all these admin­is­tra­tors and extra teach­ers paid off?”

Not accord­ing to the stats

results

I inter­viewed pro­fes­sor Scafidi at the amplify choice event in Den­ver last month about these figures.

The cur­rent sys­tem is only been suc­cess­ful at one thing, pro­vid­ing patron­age and jobs to every bureau­crat that needs it.

And it’s to pro­tect that $395 Mil­lion in patron­age locally and 27.1 Bil­lion in patron­age nation­ally and the power that patron­age pro­vides that those fight­ing char­ter schools are really look­ing to protect.

One of the things that has confused me quite a bit in the battle for charter school both in general and here in Massachusetts per question 2 is the math behind the opposition.

As a rule the voters who tend so support charter schools the most are the very poor voters whose children are trapped in failing schools that many of the opponents of charter schools have failed to serve.

And while the Teachers unions are almost completely united against charter schools many individual teachers are not all that pleased with their unions decisions and when given the chance to abandon the unions as they were in Wisconsin, left them in drove.

This would indicate a giant contradiction, one would think that rather than opposing and jeopardizing one’s base, one would embrace them, additionally simple math will tell you that even if the teachers were united against charter schools the number of students and parents would benefit from them vastly outnumbers them, after all every kid that goes to a charter school is one less added to an existing classroom.

So why are so many leaders willing to fight against them? the Answer comes from some figures concerning students teachers and bureaucrats put together by Ben Scafidi of Kennesaw State University.

staffing-1992-2014
Yes you are seeing that right, since 1992 staffing has increased at a rate nearly double as students and even more incredibly administration has increased at an even greater rate than teachers.

Now one might argue that the increase in teachers is a good thing as it would result in smaller class sizes but can you really argue that we schools needed that incredible increase in administrators?

and what does that kind of increase in administration beyond the increase in student cost?

what-if-national

That’s an awful lot of money being spent that to provide jobs for bureaucrats.

As far as Massachusetts goes, here are the number

ma-chart

the Numbers of teachers has increased at a rate 100% higher than then number of students, But as you can see the number of school administrators by a rate 150% more than the increase in students.

How much did all those administrators cost Massachusetts?

ma-savings

Now you might say “but datechguy, hasn’t all these administrators and extra teachers paid off?”

Not according to the stats

results

I interviewed professor Scafidi at the amplify choice event in Denver last month about these figures.

The current system is only been successful at one thing, providing patronage and jobs to every bureaucrat that needs it.

And it’s to protect that $395 Million in patronage locally and 27.1 Billion in patronage nationally and the power that patronage provides that those fighting charter schools are really looking to protect.