The Three March for life Shockers for new Viewers

Readability

The Three March for life Shockers for new Viewers

Yes­ter­day was the March for life and one of the signs of the fear of the left was the sud­den inter­est in the twit­ter Hash­tags #march4life and #march­for­life by out­raged leftists.

To be sure in pre­vi­ous years you had some but unlike the first 43 years of the March the new pres­i­dent made sure that this was news and the fear, worry and anger of the left online was palatable.

There were many things that might have sur­prised those who saw the March for life for the first time yes­ter­day, here are the top 3

1. The Num­ber of Women at the March. Any­one who has ever seen a protest in front of Planned Par­ent­hood would know that the pro-​life /​anti-​abortion move­ment is a move­ment dri­ven by women, many of who have first hand expe­ri­ence with abor­tion who deeply regret it and the pain it has causes them. This is com­pletely con­trary to the meme pushed by the media and the left that it must have been a real shock to view­ers who have been told for decades that pro-​life is actu­ally about men want­ing to con­trol women’s bod­ies. This is the exact oppo­site of truth as any woman who has been pres­sured to kill her child by the fel­low who got her preg­nant can tell you.

2. The num­ber of young peo­ple at the march.
The amount of youth at these marches is always huge. On TV the left keeps using images of young peo­ple when push­ing for the right to kill a child but there are always thou­sands upon thou­sands of teens and twenty some­things at the march every year. Given that the march has gone on for 44 years there were likely more than a few chil­dren and grand­chil­dren of those who have marched in the past there. That’s made pos­si­ble by not killing them in the womb.

3. Happy, Non-​violent and clean:
We have to thank our friends on the left for this one. On inau­gu­ra­tion day the Amer­i­can Pub­lic saw the Anti-​Trump left torch limos and throw bricks thru win­dows and at police. Ear­lier this week we saw the so called “woman’s” march (actu­ally the lib­eral anti-​trump march) leave DC cov­ered in trash and signs and heard their lead­ers shout vio­lent angry and vul­gar slo­gans on national TV.

Yes­ter­day they saw a March larger than either one that had not only had no vio­lence (in fact marchers thanked police for their pro­tec­tion), Signs with­out body parts (albeit not absent thought pro­vok­ing images like this one)


Speeches absent of vul­gar­ity or even vitriol,including ones from Kellyanne Con­way and the Vice Pres­i­dent of the United states and this win­ner from Mia Love, but a Cap­i­tal left just as clean if not cleaner that before the marchers turned up.

To those who have fol­lowed the March for Life every year, none of that would be a shock, to those dis­cov­er­ing it for the first time who have seen the occupods camps on TV or in their own cities and heard the shrieks of angry left­ists protest­ing when Milo comes to town it must have been a revelation.

These sets of facts (Dare I say “Alter­na­tive Facts”) that the MSM has never exposed the aver­age news con­sumer to in the past must have been eye open­ing. What they choose to do with these facts, well that’s up to them, but it will be a hard thing for the left and their media allies to put that genie back into the bottle.

Update (via Glenn): Bingo

Of per­haps more sig­nif­i­cant inter­est, how­ever, is the fact that Keilar and CNN were forced to put the March for Life on the same polit­i­cal foot­ing as the Women’s March on Wash­ing­ton. Equally sur­pris­ing is the fact that the Women’s March on Wash­ing­ton is already being described as a ‘lib­eral women’s march’ even by an out­let such as CNN. Instead of being a non­par­ti­san protest by all women against the tyranny of Trump, all the work and effort put into the Women’s March has been rel­e­gated, in the space of less than a week, to a par­ti­san lib­eral protest that was most promi­nently asso­ci­ated with Planned Par­ent­hood. All of the sup­posed moral author­ity of an entire gen­der has been wiped aside in favor of a frank and hon­est acknowl­edge­ment that the marchers were merely lib­er­als who were super unhappy with how the elec­tion turned out.”

Yesterday was the March for life and one of the signs of the fear of the left was the sudden interest in the twitter Hashtags #march4life and #marchforlife by outraged leftists.

To be sure in previous years you had some but unlike the first 43 years of the March the new president made sure that this was news and the fear, worry and anger of the left online was palatable.

There were many things that might have surprised those who saw the March for life for the first time yesterday, here are the top 3

1. The Number of Women at the March. Anyone who has ever seen a protest in front of Planned Parenthood would know that the pro-life / anti-abortion movement is a movement driven by women, many of who have first hand experience with abortion who deeply regret it and the pain it has causes them. This is completely contrary to the meme pushed by the media and the left that it must have been a real shock to viewers who have been told for decades that pro-life is actually about men wanting to control women’s bodies. This is the exact opposite of truth as any woman who has been pressured to kill her child by the fellow who got her pregnant can tell you.

2. The number of young people at the march.
The amount of youth at these marches is always huge. On TV the left keeps using images of young people when pushing for the right to kill a child but there are always thousands upon thousands of teens and twenty somethings at the march every year. Given that the march has gone on for 44 years there were likely more than a few children and grandchildren of those who have marched in the past there. That’s made possible by not killing them in the womb.

3. Happy, Non-violent and clean:
We have to thank our friends on the left for this one. On inauguration day the American Public saw the Anti-Trump left torch limos and throw bricks thru windows and at police. Earlier this week we saw the so called “woman’s” march (actually the liberal anti-trump march) leave DC covered in trash and signs and heard their leaders shout violent angry and vulgar slogans on national TV.

Yesterday they saw a March larger than either one that had not only had no violence (in fact marchers thanked police for their protection), Signs without body parts (albeit not absent thought provoking images like this one)


Speeches absent of vulgarity or even vitriol,including ones from Kellyanne Conway and the Vice President of the United states and this winner from Mia Love, but a Capital left just as clean if not cleaner that before the marchers turned up.

To those who have followed the March for Life every year, none of that would be a shock, to those discovering it for the first time who have seen the occupods camps on TV or in their own cities and heard the shrieks of angry leftists protesting when Milo comes to town it must have been a revelation.

These sets of facts (Dare I say “Alternative Facts”) that the MSM has never exposed the average news consumer to in the past must have been eye opening. What they choose to do with these facts, well that’s up to them, but it will be a hard thing for the left and their media allies to put that genie back into the bottle.

Update (via Glenn): Bingo

Of perhaps more significant interest, however, is the fact that Keilar and CNN were forced to put the March for Life on the same political footing as the Women’s March on Washington. Equally surprising is the fact that the Women’s March on Washington is already being described as a ‘liberal women’s march’ even by an outlet such as CNN. Instead of being a nonpartisan protest by all women against the tyranny of Trump, all the work and effort put into the Women’s March has been relegated, in the space of less than a week, to a partisan liberal protest that was most prominently associated with Planned Parenthood. All of the supposed moral authority of an entire gender has been wiped aside in favor of a frank and honest acknowledgement that the marchers were merely liberals who were super unhappy with how the election turned out.”