In Defense of Jake Tapper

Readability

In Defense of Jake Tapper

As all of you who read this blog know I’ve always liked Jake Tap­per, both per­son­ally and pro­fes­sion­ally. In our encoun­ters both online and in per­son he never treated me with any less respect because I was a blog­ger and was kind enough to come on my show when invited.

Fur­ther­more dur­ing the Obama years he was prac­ti­cally alone in ques­tion­ing the admin­is­tra­tion and demo­c­rat lead­ers when the rest of the press gave them a pass. I’ll never for­get watch­ing dur­ing the elec­tion sea­son when the story of Hillary hav­ing to be helped into the van broke. When “reli­able sources” was one the whole story was treated as if it was a plot from Fox mean­ing that his was some­thing com­pletely to be ignored, at Noon­time Jake came on live and sud­denly it was treated as the seri­ous news story that it was, right up until the moment that he went off the air and CNN went back to Clin­ton defense mode.

Many times I’ve said that Tapper’s con­ser­v­a­tive fans had bet­ter get ready because once the GOP was back in the White House they would find them­selves unable to tell the dif­fer­ence between him and the rest of the MSM because he would be just as tough on our side as he was on their.

All that being said Tapper’s state­ment “…I did fact checks about Barack Obama, too, not at the same rate, nor was there a need for them at the same rate,” was a self-​inflicted wound. It sug­gests that he is delib­er­ately being harder on Trump than the very dis­hon­est and dis­hon­or­able Obama administration.

There are two rea­sons why I sus­pect this is the case:

1. Lit­er­ally but not seri­ously vs Seri­ously but not Literally

One of the things you will note about Amer­i­can Pols, par­tic­u­larly our Demo­c­rat friends is how care­fully they parse their words, Bill Clinton’s “It depends on what the mean­ing of the world ‘is’ is”, Al Gore’s “No Con­trol­ling legal author­ity” or any of the care­fully worded denials of wire­tap­ping by Obama era offi­cials con­cern­ing the Trump cam­paign imme­di­ately come to mind.

Don­ald Trump is the com­pletely oppo­site of this. He tends to talk like a nor­mal per­son because his back­ground is not polit­i­cal. Because he is less exact about what he says the polit­i­cal press has a field day fact check­ing words while miss­ing the valid points he is con­stantly mak­ing. As Salena Zito put it

The press takes Trump lit­er­ally, but not seri­ously; his sup­port­ers take him seri­ously, but not literally.”

If you spend your career look­ing for false­hoods in care­fully parsed words a guy like Pres­i­dent Trump is going to com­pletely over­turn the stan­dards by which you judge what a pol says.

That’s just life as it is.

2. The fat pitch that was missed.

The sec­ond rea­son has to do with the infa­mous inter­view with can­di­date Trump before Super Tues­day when Jake gave him the “Denounce David Duke” question.

This frankly was pretty much a pro-​forma ques­tion, a slow pitch over the plate that Can­di­date Trump should have hit out of the park with no prob­lem. As I said at the time:

For­get­ting all the cir­cus that has come since, the bot­tom line is you don’t get a much fat­ter pitch in the game of pol­i­tics than: “Do you denounce the KKK and David Duke?”

He didn’t

It was also a very odd error as I said at the time:

It’s dou­bly con­fus­ing given that in the past he had no prob­lem dis­avow­ing Duke in his reform party days and even did so on Fri­day when Chris Christie endorsed him.

Frankly given that past and the fact that Trump isn’t stu­pid, I pre­sume his per­for­mance with Jake Tap­per was the ulti­mate brain fart

How­ever dou­ble stan­dards (Where was the Obama denun­ci­a­tion of ter­ror­ist Bill Ayers in whose house he started his cam­paign) bad mics brain farts or what­ever it was an unen­forced error that not only is still being used to por­tray Trump as some­thing he’s not made, in my opin­ion a huge impres­sion on Jake. Look at his face dur­ing that exchange and it speaks vol­umes.

Now you might say that’s unfair, you might say (as I do) that the racism and anti­semitism charges against Trump are ridicu­lous on their face but I’ll not deny Jake the right to make a judge­ment based on what he him­self heard (I don’t know if they actu­ally see each other dur­ing such exchanges) at the time dur­ing his own interview.

All that being said I think it would be a good idea for Jake to clar­ify and mod­ify his remarks because what he said doesn’t reflect well on him (I’d say it doesn’t reflect well on main­stream jour­nal­ism, but main­stream jour­nal­ism doesn’t reflect well on main­stream jour­nal­ism so this remark won’t make it any worse). He’s a good guy and a fine jour­nal­ist and should no more be defined by this mis­take that Don­ald Trump should by is gaffe of last February.

Now there may be some read­ers here who object to this, but as I said, I like Jake Tap­per, both per­son­ally and pro­fes­sion­ally and I would no more throw him under the bus over a sin­gle gaffe than I was will­ing to throw Don­ald Trump under the bus when the Bush tape came out when every­body and I mean EVERY­BODY wanted Don­ald Trump with a rope around his neck.
That’s not how I work.

Clos­ing thought. Be aware that if Mr. Tap­per is still in the field of jour­nal­ism the next time a Demo­c­rat is either in the White House or Sen­ate Major­ity Leader or Speaker of the House, rest assured that my con­ser­v­a­tive friends who are now hav­ing a fit will sud­denly find them­selves warm­ing up to him when he once again becomes the only mem­ber of the main­stream press who ques­tions a word they say, unless by some mir­a­cle the rest of the media devel­ops ethics by that time.

2016 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards
If there was ever a post that’s unlikely to gen­er­ate tip jar hits around here, this is it.

Nev­er­the­less if you are able and inclined to help mit­i­gate them I’d ask you to con­sider hit­ting DaTipJar




[olimome­ter id=3]

Please con­sider Sub­scrib­ing. You can be listed as a Friend of DaT­e­chguy blog for as lit­tle as $2 a week. If only 130 of the 209K+ unique vis­i­tors who came in 2016 .07% sub­scribed at the same lev­els as our cur­rent sub­scrip­tion base we would make our cur­rent annual goal with ease. If we could boost that num­ber to 260 I could afford to cover major events in per­son all over the country.

Remem­ber all sub­scribers get my weekly pod­cast emailed directly to you before it goes up any­where else.


Choose a Sub­scrip­tion level



If you are not in the posi­tion to hit DaTip­Jar We will be very happy to accept your prayers

As all of you who read this blog know I’ve always liked Jake Tapper, both personally and professionally. In our encounters both online and in person he never treated me with any less respect because I was a blogger and was kind enough to come on my show when invited.

Furthermore during the Obama years he was practically alone in questioning the administration and democrat leaders when the rest of the press gave them a pass. I’ll never forget watching during the election season when the story of Hillary having to be helped into the van broke. When “reliable sources” was one the whole story was treated as if it was a plot from Fox meaning that his was something completely to be ignored, at Noontime Jake came on live and suddenly it was treated as the serious news story that it was, right up until the moment that he went off the air and CNN went back to Clinton defense mode.

Many times I’ve said that Tapper’s conservative fans had better get ready because once the GOP was back in the White House they would find themselves unable to tell the difference between him and the rest of the MSM because he would be just as tough on our side as he was on their.

All that being said Tapper’s statement “…I did fact checks about Barack Obama, too, not at the same rate, nor was there a need for them at the same rate,” was a self-inflicted wound. It suggests that he is deliberately being harder on Trump than the very dishonest and dishonorable Obama administration.

There are two reasons why I suspect this is the case:

1. Literally but not seriously vs Seriously but not Literally

One of the things you will note about American Pols, particularly our Democrat friends is how carefully they parse their words, Bill Clinton’s “It depends on what the meaning of the world ‘is’ is“, Al Gore’s “No Controlling legal authority” or any of the carefully worded denials of wiretapping by Obama era officials concerning the Trump campaign immediately come to mind.

Donald Trump is the completely opposite of this. He tends to talk like a normal person because his background is not political. Because he is less exact about what he says the political press has a field day fact checking words while missing the valid points he is constantly making. As Salena Zito put it

“The press takes Trump literally, but not seriously; his supporters take him seriously, but not literally.”

If you spend your career looking for falsehoods in carefully parsed words a guy like President Trump is going to completely overturn the standards by which you judge what a pol says.

That’s just life as it is.

2. The fat pitch that was missed.

The second reason has to do with the infamous interview with candidate Trump before Super Tuesday when Jake gave him the “Denounce David Duke” question.

This frankly was pretty much a pro-forma question, a slow pitch over the plate that Candidate Trump should have hit out of the park with no problem. As I said at the time:

Forgetting all the circus that has come since, the bottom line is you don’t get a much fatter pitch in the game of politics than: “Do you denounce the KKK and David Duke?”

He didn’t

It was also a very odd error as I said at the time:

It’s doubly confusing given that in the past he had no problem disavowing Duke in his reform party days and even did so on Friday when Chris Christie endorsed him.

Frankly given that past and the fact that Trump isn’t stupid, I presume his performance with Jake Tapper was the ultimate brain fart

However double standards (Where was the Obama denunciation of terrorist Bill Ayers in whose house he started his campaign) bad mics brain farts or whatever it was an unenforced error that not only is still being used to portray Trump as something he’s not made, in my opinion a huge impression on Jake. Look at his face during that exchange and it speaks volumes.

Now you might say that’s unfair, you might say (as I do) that the racism and antisemitism charges against Trump are ridiculous on their face but I’ll not deny Jake the right to make a judgement based on what he himself heard (I don’t know if they actually see each other during such exchanges) at the time during his own interview.

All that being said I think it would be a good idea for Jake to clarify and modify his remarks because what he said doesn’t reflect well on him (I’d say it doesn’t reflect well on mainstream journalism, but mainstream journalism doesn’t reflect well on mainstream journalism so this remark won’t make it any worse). He’s a good guy and a fine journalist and should no more be defined by this mistake that Donald Trump should by is gaffe of last February.

Now there may be some readers here who object to this, but as I said, I like Jake Tapper, both personally and professionally and I would no more throw him under the bus over a single gaffe than I was willing to throw Donald Trump under the bus when the Bush tape came out when everybody and I mean EVERYBODY wanted Donald Trump with a rope around his neck.
That’s not how I work.

Closing thought. Be aware that if Mr. Tapper is still in the field of journalism the next time a Democrat is either in the White House or Senate Majority Leader or Speaker of the House, rest assured that my conservative friends who are now having a fit will suddenly find themselves warming up to him when he once again becomes the only member of the mainstream press who questions a word they say, unless by some miracle the rest of the media develops ethics by that time.

2016 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards
If there was ever a post that’s unlikely to generate tip jar hits around here, this is it.

Nevertheless if you are able and inclined to help mitigate them I’d ask you to consider hitting DaTipJar




Olimometer 2.52

Please consider Subscribing. You can be listed as a Friend of DaTechguy blog for as little as $2 a week. If only 130 of the 209K+ unique visitors who came in 2016 .07% subscribed at the same levels as our current subscription base we would make our current annual goal with ease. If we could boost that number to 260 I could afford to cover major events in person all over the country.

Remember all subscribers get my weekly podcast emailed directly to you before it goes up anywhere else.


Choose a Subscription level



If you are not in the position to hit DaTipJar We will be very happy to accept your prayers