HuffPo: Let’s take away white men’s right to vote

Readability

HuffPo: Let's take away white men's right to vote

The Huff­in­g­ton Post has a piece by phi­los­o­phy stu­dent Shel­ley Gar­land, who asks, Could It Be Time To Deny White Men The Franchise?

My imme­di­ate reac­tion was, “Could it be time to deny white female phi­los­o­phy stu­dents the right to opine?,” a rather unchar­i­ta­ble thought to be hav­ing on a Good Friday.

Gar­land argues that deny­ing white males around the world the right to vote for twenty years (“less than a gen­er­a­tion”) would strengthen the pro­gres­sive cause, which may or may not be cor­rect, and would

allow leg­is­la­tion to be passed which could see the world’s wealth far more equi­tably shared.

Garland’s search for “equal­ity” would end the rule of law by pur­posely deny­ing men their unalien­able rights to own prop­erty, legal rep­re­sen­ta­tion and any­thing other that Marx­ists don’t agree with.

The the­sis is, enact global leg­is­la­tion to deny rights in order to pass leg­is­la­tion that gives free stuff to her and her friends.

Dras­tic as her racist misandry pro­posal is, she’s not even sure about her num­bers, though,

Although sta­tis­tics by race are dif­fi­cult to find from other parts of the world, it is very likely that the major­ity of the world’s assets are in the hands of white males, despite them mak­ing up less than 10 per­cent of the world’s population.

It’s ironic that the arti­cle is at the Huff­in­g­ton Post, which has close ties with rich white male George Soros„ but I’d like to ask how Gar­land will decide who qual­i­fies as a “white male.”

Would Mex­i­can open-​borders activist Jorge Ramos have the US$75million he made in 2014 seized because he’s Cau­casian? How about the post-​gender con­fir­ma­tion surgery Jen­ner? How about the rul­ing fam­i­lies of the Mid­dle East? The Chi­nese oli­garchs? Or any­one with any­thing other than Cau­casian ances­try? Would the moth­ers of male chil­dren not stand up for their sons? Would she revive the “one drop rule”?

More to the point, what gives Gar­land and her ilk the right to decide any such matter?

Some­one ought to tell Gar­land that in Venezuela, where the hun­gry broke into the zoo and butchered a horse as a con­se­quence of real-​life pro­gres­sive causes, the rich­est per­son in the coun­try is the daugh­ter of the late dic­ta­tor Hugo Chávez.

How’s that for equality?

Fausta Rodríguez Wertz writes in U. S. and Latin Amer­ica at Fausta’s blog.

The Huffington Post has a piece by philosophy student Shelley Garland, who asks, Could It Be Time To Deny White Men The Franchise?

My immediate reaction was, “Could it be time to deny white female philosophy students the right to opine?,” a rather uncharitable thought to be having on a Good Friday.

Garland argues that denying white males around the world the right to vote for twenty years (“less than a generation”) would strengthen the progressive cause, which may or may not be correct, and would

allow legislation to be passed which could see the world’s wealth far more equitably shared.

Garland’s search for “equality” would end the rule of law by purposely denying men their unalienable rights to own property, legal representation and anything other that Marxists don’t agree with.

The thesis is, enact global legislation to deny rights in order to pass legislation that gives free stuff to her and her friends.

Drastic as her racist misandry proposal is, she’s not even sure about her numbers, though,

Although statistics by race are difficult to find from other parts of the world, it is very likely that the majority of the world’s assets are in the hands of white males, despite them making up less than 10 percent of the world’s population.

It’s ironic that the article is at the Huffington Post, which has close ties with rich white male George Soros,, but I’d like to ask how Garland will decide who qualifies as a “white male.”

Would Mexican open-borders activist Jorge Ramos have the US$75million he made in 2014 seized because he’s Caucasian? How about the post-gender confirmation surgery Jenner? How about the ruling families of the Middle East? The Chinese oligarchs? Or anyone with anything other than Caucasian ancestry? Would the mothers of male children not stand up for their sons? Would she revive the “one drop rule”?

More to the point, what gives Garland and her ilk the right to decide any such matter?

Someone ought to tell Garland that in Venezuela, where the hungry broke into the zoo and butchered a horse as a consequence of real-life progressive causes, the richest person in the country is the daughter of the late dictator Hugo Chávez.

How’s that for equality?

Fausta Rodríguez Wertz writes in U. S. and Latin America at Fausta’s blog.