Repeating my Question to Liberal Feminists Post Lauer #Pervnado How many new victims would have been worth Trump’s Defeat?

Readability

Repeating my Question to Liberal Feminists Post Lauer #Pervnado How many new victims would have been worth Trump's Defeat?

[cap­tion id=“attachment_101636” align=“aligncenter” width=“442”] Har­vey Wein­stein image by DAvid Shankbone via Wikipedia[/caption]

With the depar­ture of Keil­lor (and David Sweeney) at NPR and Matt Lauer at NBC and with the Black Cau­cus try­ing to force Cony­ers out it’s time to repeat the ques­tion I asked months ago when Wein­stien and the Hol­ly­wood sex­ual harass­ment dam broke.

So for those who you Hate Trump but are out­raged over Wein­stein I have two ques­tions for you:

Would the price of Wein­stein never being exposed have been worth it to you if it meant Hillary Clin­ton beat­ing Don­ald Trump in 2016?

If the answer to the first ques­tion is yes: At what num­ber of new women vic­tim­ized by Mr. Wein­stein would that price become too high?

Now let repeat these ques­tions to our media/​feminist/​liberal friends again with a slight modification:

Know­ing what you know now would the price of all the preda­tors of the left from Wein­stein to Keil­lor to Lauer never being exposed have been worth it if it meant Hillary Clin­ton beat Don­ald Trump in 2016?

If the answer to the ques­tion is “Yes” at what num­ber of new women vic­tim­ized in the Per­v­nado rev­e­la­tions form Wein­stien to Lauer make the price of a Hillary win too high to pay?

I think the answer to this ques­tion would be very telling.

Harvey Weinstein image by DAvid Shankbone via Wikipedia

With the departure of Keillor (and David Sweeney) at NPR and Matt Lauer at NBC and with the Black Caucus trying to force Conyers out it’s time to repeat the question I asked months ago when Weinstien and the Hollywood sexual harassment dam broke.

So for those who you Hate Trump but are outraged over Weinstein I have two questions for you:

Would the price of Weinstein never being exposed have been worth it to you if it meant Hillary Clinton beating Donald Trump in 2016?

If the answer to the first question is yes: At what number of new women victimized by Mr. Weinstein would that price become too high?

Now let repeat these questions to our media/feminist/liberal friends again with a slight modification:

Knowing what you know now would the price of all the predators of the left from Weinstein to Keillor to Lauer never being exposed have been worth it if it meant Hillary Clinton beat Donald Trump in 2016?

If the answer to the question is “Yes” at what number of new women victimized in the Pervnado revelations form Weinstien to Lauer make the price of a Hillary win too high to pay?

I think the answer to this question would be very telling.