Conyers & Franken et/all should face voters post accusation as Trump & Moore have

Readability

Conyers & Franken et/all should face voters post accusation as Trump & Moore have

Rep Jim Clyburn has taken some grief by not­ing when asked about John (Drop my Trow) Cony­ers that unlike a Matt Lauer or a Har­vey Wein­stein, they were elected and thus put there by the peo­ple and I had some fun teas­ing Ana Navarro when she lamented the fact that while many in the News and enter­tain­ment indus­try are out, pols she dis­likes (Trump, Moore and Clyburn) are still either in office or run­ning for one.

Iron­i­cally both Navarro & Clyburn are half right there seems to be a dif­fer­ent stan­dard for pols but that stan­dard is dif­fer­ent because their bosses aren’t a sin­gle board that can act at any time but the vot­ers who only get to make a call every two to four years and thus only express their will at that time, except in extra­or­di­nary circumstances.

Yet unless if vot­ers had no idea about this kind of thing going on or alle­ga­tions of same then they didn’t make an informed choice. This is exactly the sit­u­a­tion with Sen­a­tor Franken and Rep Conyers.

For­tu­nately there is an easy solu­tion , if they main­tain (as does Rep Cony­ers) that alle­ga­tions are false or have expressed con­tri­tion (as does Sen­a­tor Franken) the thing to do is resign AND run in the spe­cial elec­tion that follows.

By doing this they give the vot­ers the chance to make an informed deci­sion and decide if:

  1. They think the charges are true and want him out
  2. They think the charges are true but, for what­ever rea­son think they’re not disqualifying
  3. They’re unsure about the charges but pre­fer a change
  4. They’re unsure about the charges but pre­fer to stand pat
  5. They think the charges are false but pre­fer a change
  6. They think the charges are false and are stick­ing with their guy.

Iron­i­cally this is exactly the posi­tion that both Pres­i­dent Trump and Judge Roy Moore were put in. Unlike Franken and Cony­ers who as lib­er­als were pro­tected with all their might by the press, because of the “R” next to their names that same media made sure that vot­ers were inti­mately acquainted with alle­ga­tions against Pres­i­dent Trump and Roy Moore come elec­tion time.

In the case of Pres­i­dent Trump either rejected the charges as par­ti­san BS (like me) or decided that Felo­nia Von Paintsuit was such a dan­ger to the coun­try that she must be stopped (like many oth­ers) and elected him any­ways over Ana Navarro’s objections.

In Alabama vot­ers are going to get that same chance with Roy Moore, if poten­tial Moore vot­ers think the accu­sa­tions as they stand are dis­qual­i­fy­ing (I don’t as I’ve already explained here) or that Moore is lying and choose to reject him they can do so, but if they think the charges are either false, unproven, not dis­qual­i­fy­ing, or a polit­i­cal hit they can reject them and choose to elect him over Ana Navarro’s objections.

I think the vot­ers they rep­re­sent deserve that same chance, not only on Franken and Cony­ers, but on every sin­gle con­gress­man who had a set­tle­ment paid by tax­payer funds for harass­ment. They should be exposed at once, resign and if they think they still deserve their seat run for it and make their best case to the vot­ers they represent.

That way like NBC or Mira­max or PBS those in charge are in a posi­tion to make an informed deci­sion with­out wait­ing for Novem­ber in an even-​numbered year and if Jim Clyburn or Ana Navarro or even I don’t like that deci­sion, well that’s just too bad because the call and the respon­si­bil­ity isn’t ours it’s theirs.

Rep Jim Clyburn has taken some grief by noting when asked about John (Drop my Trow) Conyers that unlike a Matt Lauer or a Harvey Weinstein, they were elected and thus put there by the people and I had some fun teasing Ana Navarro when she lamented the fact that while many in the News and entertainment industry are out, pols she dislikes (Trump, Moore and Clyburn) are still either in office or running for one.

Ironically both Navarro & Clyburn are half right there seems to be a different standard for pols but that standard is different because their bosses aren’t a single board that can act at any time but the voters who only get to make a call every two to four years and thus only express their will at that time, except in extraordinary circumstances.

Yet unless if voters had no idea about this kind of thing going on or allegations of same then they didn’t make an informed choice.  This is exactly the situation with Senator Franken and Rep Conyers.

Fortunately there is an easy solution , if they maintain (as does Rep Conyers) that allegations are false or have expressed contrition (as does Senator Franken) the thing to do is resign AND run in the special election that follows.

By doing this they give the voters the chance to make an informed decision and decide if:

  1.  They think the charges are true and want him out
  2.  They think the charges are true but, for whatever reason think they’re not disqualifying
  3.  They’re unsure about the charges but prefer a change
  4.  They’re unsure about the charges but prefer to stand pat
  5.  They think the charges are false but prefer a change
  6.  They think the charges are false and are sticking with their guy.

Ironically this is exactly the position that both President Trump and Judge Roy Moore were put in. Unlike Franken and Conyers who as liberals were protected with all their might by the press, because of the “R” next to their names that same media made sure that voters were intimately acquainted with allegations against President Trump and Roy Moore come election time.

In the case of President Trump either rejected the charges as partisan BS (like me) or decided that Felonia Von Paintsuit was such a danger to the country that she must be stopped (like many others) and elected him anyways over Ana Navarro’s objections.

In Alabama voters are going to get that same chance with Roy Moore, if potential Moore voters think the accusations as they stand are disqualifying (I don’t as I’ve already explained here) or that Moore is lying and choose to reject him they can do so, but if they think the charges are either false, unproven, not disqualifying, or a political hit they can reject them and choose to elect him over Ana Navarro’s objections.

I think the voters they represent deserve that same chance, not only on Franken and Conyers, but on every single congressman who had a settlement paid by taxpayer funds for harassment. They should be exposed at once, resign and if they think they still deserve their seat run for it and make their best case to the voters they represent.

That way like NBC or Miramax or PBS those in charge are in a position to make an informed decision without waiting for November in an even-numbered year and if Jim Clyburn or Ana Navarro or even I don’t like that decision, well that’s just too bad because the call and the responsibility isn’t ours it’s theirs.