Special Needs Placard Not Needed

by Juliette Akinyi Ochieng | May 5th, 2018

Readability

Special Needs Placard Not Needed

by baldilocks

This is a cropped ver­sion of a July 14, 2004 post from my old blog. I gen­eral feel like I’m repeat­ing myself all the time so I fig­ured that one more time won’t hurt. Edited. And, appar­ently, a lot of peo­ple didn’t get this memo.

What have Republicans/​conservatives done for black Amer­i­cans? I hear that ques­tion con­stantly when I dis­close that I am a con­ser­v­a­tive Repub­li­can. Often I will pro­vide the usual facts that seem to be miss­ing from the his­tor­i­cal lex­i­con these days: freed the slaves, were 90%+ in the major­ity in the votes for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Vot­ing Rights Act of 1965. How­ever, some­thing about the ques­tion sets steel to my nerves and I’ve been mean­ing to artic­u­late the rea­sons for it here for some time now.

Implied in the ques­tion is that a polit­i­cal party must “do some­thing” for blacks. Not merely the usual “some­thing” that a gov­ern­ment entity does for all of its con­stituents, e.g. pro­vide util­i­ties, reg­u­late com­merce, etc., but some­thing spe­cial.

That word ‘spe­cial’ has taken on a new mean­ing in recent years and I think that it applies to the spe­cial items that liberals/​leftists believe that the gov­ern­ment should pro­vide for the ‘spe­cial’ peo­ple, the “con­gen­i­tally retarded” folk.

Yes, we ‘spe­cial’ peo­ple — with ‘spe­cial’ needs — require spe­cial han­dling: spe­cial edu­ca­tion and spe­cial employ­ment. You can’t expect black peo­ple to live up to the stan­dards of ‘nor­mal’ peo­ple. Like para­plegics or the blind or the deaf or those afflicted with Down’s syn­drome, sin­gu­lar accom­mo­da­tions must be made for the great hand­i­cap of being born with black skin. To liberals/​leftists, black peo­ple are a crip­pled class that can never be made whole just as long as they can never be made not-​black. What’s this notion called?

And if any­one tries to treat us as full, com­pe­tent adults, the liberals/​leftists will scream in right­eous anger and protest about the unfair­ness of it all. And if some of us ‘hand­i­capped’ ver­bally express the desire to be treated like full, com­pe­tent adults and act in a man­ner that demon­strates that desire, we are deemed as trai­tors by those who share the same racial makeup, but buy into the ‘hand­i­cap’ phi­los­o­phy. Yes, we are “trai­tors,” because if some of us refuse to take advan­tage of the spe­cial needs offered and suc­ceed any­way, the major­ity of Amer­i­cans will begin to think that we don’t really require the “hand­i­cap slot.”

The major­ity of Amer­i­cans will begin to think that we’re not really infe­rior after all. (Opti­misti­cally speak­ing, I believe that the major­ity thinks this anyway.)

You do not own, and you are not the arbiters of, African-​American authen­tic­ity,” said [Rod] Paige [to NAACP lead­ers], who rose from seg­re­gated Mis­sis­sippi to become Pres­i­dent Bush’s edu­ca­tion chief.

This idea of our race-​wide ‘hand­i­cap’ is so ingrained in the mind­sets of some, how­ever, that it has mor­phed into the very exis­tence of black iden­tity: a black per­son who believes that black Amer­i­cans need extra help to suc­ceed is “authen­ti­cally black.” Con­versely, one who doesn’t buy it “isn’t really black” and is, there­fore, a trai­tor to black identity.

In short, blacks who believe in their own infe­ri­or­ity are the real deal and those who don’t, aren’t. How’s that for twisted dogma?

Juli­ette Akinyi Ochieng has been blog­ging since 2003 as baldilocks. Her older blog is here. She pub­lished her first novel, Tale of the Tigers: Love is Not a Game in 2012.

Hit Da Tech Guy Blog’s Tip Jar for his new not-​GoDaddy host!

Or hit Juliette’s!

by baldilocks

This is a cropped version of a July 14, 2004 post from my old blog. I general feel like I’m repeating myself all the time so I figured that one more time won’t hurt. Edited. And, apparently, a lot of people didn’t get this memo.

What have Republicans/conservatives done for black Americans? I hear that question constantly when I disclose that I am a conservative Republican. Often I will provide the usual facts that seem to be missing from the historical lexicon these days: freed the slaves, were 90%+ in the majority in the votes for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. However, something about the question sets steel to my nerves and I’ve been meaning to articulate the reasons for it here for some time now.

Implied in the question is that a political party must “do something” for blacks. Not merely the usual “something” that a government entity does for all of its constituents, e.g. provide utilities, regulate commerce, etc., but something special.

That word ‘special’ has taken on a new meaning in recent years and I think that it applies to the special items that liberals/leftists believe that the government should provide for the ‘special’ people, the “congenitally retarded” folk.

Yes, we ‘special’ people — with ‘special’ needs — require special handling: special education and special employment. You can’t expect black people to live up to the standards of ‘normal’ people. Like paraplegics or the blind or the deaf or those afflicted with Down’s syndrome, singular accommodations must be made for the great handicap of being born with black skin. To liberals/leftists, black people are a crippled class that can never be made whole just as long as they can never be made not-black. What’s this notion called?

And if anyone tries to treat us as full, competent adults, the liberals/leftists will scream in righteous anger and protest about the unfairness of it all. And if some of us ‘handicapped’ verbally express the desire to be treated like full, competent adults and act in a manner that demonstrates that desire, we are deemed as traitors by those who share the same racial makeup, but buy into the ‘handicap’ philosophy. Yes, we are “traitors,” because if some of us refuse to take advantage of the special needs offered and succeed anyway, the majority of Americans will begin to think that we don’t really require the “handicap slot.”

The majority of Americans will begin to think that we’re not really inferior after all. (Optimistically speaking, I believe that the majority thinks this anyway.)

“You do not own, and you are not the arbiters of, African-American authenticity,” said [Rod] Paige [to NAACP leaders], who rose from segregated Mississippi to become President Bush’s education chief.

This idea of our race-wide ‘handicap’ is so ingrained in the mindsets of some, however, that it has morphed into the very existence of black identity: a black person who believes that black Americans need extra help to succeed is “authentically black.” Conversely, one who doesn’t buy it “isn’t really black” and is, therefore, a traitor to black identity.

In short, blacks who believe in their own inferiority are the real deal and those who don’t, aren’t. How’s that for twisted dogma?

Juliette Akinyi Ochieng has been blogging since 2003 as baldilocks. Her older blog is here.  She published her first novel, Tale of the Tigers: Love is Not a Game in 2012.

Hit Da Tech Guy Blog’s Tip Jar for his new not-GoDaddy host!

Or hit Juliette’s!

Buy My Book!

Buy My Book!

Hit DaTipJar and Support Conservative Journalism & Opinion




Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 4,145 other subscribers

DH Gate Dot Com, Online Shopping

Cheap ecigarette from China - DHgate

Best Grassroots Blogs

Winner - 2014 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Catholic CD of the Month

Know your Catholic Faith

Da Pages

Winner - 2014 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Donald Trump Calls on DaTechGuy Worcester MA

 
%d bloggers like this: