Put an Admiral in charge of the Space Force

by R H | June 30th, 2018

Readability

Put an Admiral in charge of the Space Force

Pres­i­dent Trump’s announce­ment that he wants a Space Force has sparked plenty of com­plaints and tons of memes. He’s not the first to clamor for a space force, but he would be fool­ish to let the Air Force (which seems like a log­i­cal choice) run the Space Force.

The Pres­i­dent needs to put a retired Admi­ral or Marine in charge of any Space Force if he plans to get it off the ground.

Let’s start with what the Air Force would likely do with space: spend lots of money, cre­ate a huge logis­tics and com­mand and con­trol struc­ture, and then con­tinue to put satel­lites in orbit. It’s exactly in their cul­ture to do this, because the Air Force can’t do expe­di­tionary with­out incur­ring a mas­sive logis­tics train. Take a look at Afghanistan, where the pri­or­ity was to build mas­sive For­ward Oper­at­ing Bases (FOBs) that had every­thing from a run­way to Green Beans cof­fee (and then request Sailors fill their bil­lets through the IA process). A quick glance of Air Force strat­egy shows a con­tin­ued focus on build­ing more advanced satellites.

The Space Force can’t become the force that runs satel­lites. Our ene­mies con­tinue to weaponize space, and we aren’t going to win that fight. We need to do things dras­ti­cally dif­fer­ent, and that involves being able to col­o­nize space. Hav­ing a space colony, and being able to con­tinue col­o­niz­ing else­where, puts our ene­mies at a huge dis­ad­van­tage, since they can’t pos­si­bly hope to wipe out our coun­try in any con­flict. Hav­ing weapons fired from space that would eas­ily defeat ground based weapons would allow us to main­tain an eas­ier peace.

To accom­plish this, first we need to be build­ing a remote base on the Moon in order to learn how to best inhabit space. Sec­ond, we need to use this base as a launch­ing point to build inter­plan­e­tary travel that doesn’t suf­fer the neg­a­tive effects of try­ing to escape Earth’s grav­ity. Lastly, we need to be test­ing weapons in space so that as we col­o­nize other plan­ets and moons, we can defend our gains and pro­vide pres­sure on other coun­tries on Earth to not threaten our population.

The Navy is best sit­u­ated for these chal­lenges. Ships reg­u­larly oper­ate for extended peri­ods with­out shore sup­port. We’ve man­aged to build sub­marines that can pro­duce their own air, water, and store enough food to go around the world while sub­merged. The Navy has taken a min­i­mal­ist view on lux­u­ries while pro­duc­ing Sailors that can main­tain high per­for­mance equip­ment. Nav­i­gat­ing with­out GPS is now being taught again at the Naval Acad­emy. Max­i­miz­ing the use of lim­ited band­width is rou­tine for most ships and espe­cially for sub­marines. The biggest logis­ti­cal and nav­i­ga­tional chal­lenges for space are being solved daily in the Navy.

Sup­port­ing remote colonies is in the Navy’s blood. The British Navy reg­u­larly kept British colonies around the world in check. Remem­ber that we declared inde­pen­dence from Britain only to have the Howe broth­ers whoop our butts, given that they owned the sea and could out maneu­ver George Washington’s forces. We inher­ited these Naval tra­di­tions and for the longest time sup­ported colonies all over the world, and even now we’re defend­ing sea lanes that ship 95% of the world’s goods.

The Navy has the right cul­ture for Space, and given its his­tory of oper­at­ing for­ward with lim­ited sup­port, it’s by far the ser­vice best suited to pro­vide lead­ers for the Space Force.


This post rep­re­sents the views of the author and not those of the Depart­ment of Defense, Depart­ment of the Navy, or any other gov­ern­ment agency. But if asked, I’d join the Space Force, like, now.

Did you donate to Da Tech Guy? Because if not…you’re let­ting the enemy win.

President Trump’s announcement that he wants a Space Force has sparked plenty of complaints and tons of memes. He’s not the first to clamor for a space force, but he would be foolish to let the Air Force (which seems like a logical choice) run the Space Force.

The President needs to put a retired Admiral or Marine in charge of any Space Force if he plans to get it off the ground.

Let’s start with what the Air Force would likely do with space: spend lots of money, create a huge logistics and command and control structure, and then continue to put satellites in orbit. It’s exactly in their culture to do this, because the Air Force can’t do expeditionary without incurring a massive logistics train. Take a look at Afghanistan, where the priority was to build massive Forward Operating Bases (FOBs) that had everything from a runway to Green Beans coffee (and then request Sailors fill their billets through the IA process). A quick glance of Air Force strategy shows a continued focus on building more advanced satellites.

The Space Force can’t become the force that runs satellites. Our enemies continue to weaponize space, and we aren’t going to win that fight. We need to do things drastically different, and that involves being able to colonize space. Having a space colony, and being able to continue colonizing elsewhere, puts our enemies at a huge disadvantage, since they can’t possibly hope to wipe out our country in any conflict. Having weapons fired from space that would easily defeat ground based weapons would allow us to maintain an easier peace.

To accomplish this, first we need to be building a remote base on the Moon in order to learn how to best inhabit space. Second, we need to use this base as a launching point to build interplanetary travel that doesn’t suffer the negative effects of trying to escape Earth’s gravity. Lastly, we need to be testing weapons in space so that as we colonize other planets and moons, we can defend our gains and provide pressure on other countries on Earth to not threaten our population.

The Navy is best situated for these challenges. Ships regularly operate for extended periods without shore support. We’ve managed to build submarines that can produce their own air, water, and store enough food to go around the world while submerged. The Navy has taken a minimalist view on luxuries while producing Sailors that can maintain high performance equipment. Navigating without GPS is now being taught again at the Naval Academy. Maximizing the use of limited bandwidth is routine for most ships and especially for submarines. The biggest logistical and navigational challenges for space are being solved daily in the Navy.

Supporting remote colonies is in the Navy’s blood. The British Navy regularly kept British colonies around the world in check. Remember that we declared independence from Britain only to have the Howe brothers whoop our butts, given that they owned the sea and could out maneuver George Washington’s forces. We inherited these Naval traditions and for the longest time supported colonies all over the world, and even now we’re defending sea lanes that ship 95% of the world’s goods.

The Navy has the right culture for Space, and given its history of operating forward with limited support, it’s by far the service best suited to provide leaders for the Space Force.


This post represents the views of the author and not those of the Department of Defense, Department of the Navy, or any other government agency. But if asked, I’d join the Space Force, like, now.

Did you donate to Da Tech Guy? Because if not…you’re letting the enemy win.

Buy My Book!

Buy My Book!

Hit DaTipJar and Support Conservative Journalism & Opinion




Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 4,148 other subscribers

DH Gate Dot Com, Online Shopping

Cheap ecigarette from China - DHgate

Best Grassroots Blogs

Winner - 2014 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Catholic CD of the Month

Know your Catholic Faith

Da Pages

Winner - 2014 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Donald Trump Calls on DaTechGuy Worcester MA

 
%d bloggers like this: