Will Ford cut and Run? (I’m betting yes)

Readability

Will Ford cut and Run? (I'm betting yes)

Frank Pen­tan­geli: Ten to one shot, you said. Ten to one shot in my favor, and I lose.

God­fa­ther 2 1974

Jede­diah Tucker Ward: It’s not hypo­thet­i­cal to Dr. Pavel, he wrote it
Michael Gra­zier: So he says.
Jede­diah Tucker Ward: So he says under oath

Class Action 1991

Two days ago Rush Lim­baugh said aloud some­thing I had been think­ing. Chris­tine Ford is not going to tes­tify under oath.

The fact that she cleared her social media his­tory, sent her let­ter to a House mem­ber with no juris­dic­tion which coin­ci­den­tally avoids the penal­ties of per­jury and the repeated efforts to stall were all clues.

Now the big gun has been brought out.

I think this clinches it. The Demo­c­rat plan all along has been to spook either Trump or the GOP or Kavanaugh in order to get him to with­draw or to get Trump to pull the nomination.

All the blus­ter, all the talk, the New Yorker arti­cles and Stormy Daniels lawyer all of it was to get him to cut and run.

Now it’s the day before the sched­uled hear­ings. Ford has a choice, she can tes­tify under oath under the same penal­ties of per­jury that Kavanaugh has or she can cut and run. We’ve heard from Kavanaugh under oath it’s time for Ford to do the same.

I had been think­ing that there was at least a 40% chance she shows up fig­ur­ing that it would be tough to prove per­jury unless they can find proof in com­mu­ni­ca­tion with Demo­c­rat oper­a­tives and the deep state to pro­tect her. Plus there is the risk to the gravy train if she cuts and runs.

Now see­ing this tweet from Fein­stein I’m think­ing Rush is right. Ford might be fig­ur­ing that Don­ald Trump is a Jack­son­ian and if any admin­is­tra­tion would pur­sue such a case it’s this one and it only takes one per­son to offer to talk, par­tic­u­larly if they are trad­ing that talk­ing for a lighter sen­tence on another matter.

Now I’m fig­ur­ing it’s 90% that she cries “vic­tim” and “unfair” and refuse to show with both the media and dems back­ing her up.

Polit­i­cally it’s the best move for the left, the longer this goes on the more dis­gusted the non-​pussy hat gen­er­a­tion gets and the more likely this costs the left any hope of win­ning in the midterms. Bet­ter to cut your losses, cry “unfair” and then fund raise off of Kavanaugh in the hopes of win­ning in 2020.

Tomor­row should be really interesting.

Frank Pentangeli: Ten to one shot, you said. Ten to one shot in my favor, and I lose.

Godfather 2 1974

Jedediah Tucker Ward: It’s not hypothetical to Dr. Pavel, he wrote it
Michael Grazier: So he says.
Jedediah Tucker Ward: So he says under oath

Class Action 1991

Two days ago Rush Limbaugh said aloud something I had been thinking. Christine Ford is not going to testify under oath.

The fact that she cleared her social media history, sent her letter to a House member with no jurisdiction which coincidentally avoids the penalties of perjury and the repeated efforts to stall were all clues.

Now the big gun has been brought out.

I think this clinches it. The Democrat plan all along has been to spook either Trump or the GOP or Kavanaugh in order to get him to withdraw or to get Trump to pull the nomination.

All the bluster, all the talk, the New Yorker articles and Stormy Daniels lawyer all of it was to get him to cut and run.

Now it’s the day before the scheduled hearings. Ford has a choice, she can testify under oath under the same penalties of perjury that Kavanaugh has or she can cut and run. We’ve heard from Kavanaugh under oath it’s time for Ford to do the same.

I had been thinking that there was at least a 40% chance she shows up figuring that it would be tough to prove perjury unless they can find proof in communication with Democrat operatives and the deep state to protect her. Plus there is the risk to the gravy train if she cuts and runs.

Now seeing this tweet from Feinstein I’m thinking Rush is right. Ford might be figuring that Donald Trump is a Jacksonian and if any administration would pursue such a case it’s this one and it only takes one person to offer to talk, particularly if they are trading that talking for a lighter sentence on another matter.

Now I’m figuring it’s 90% that she cries “victim” and “unfair” and refuse to show with both the media and dems backing her up.

Politically it’s the best move for the left, the longer this goes on the more disgusted the non-pussy hat generation gets and the more likely this costs the left any hope of winning in the midterms. Better to cut your losses, cry “unfair” and then fund raise off of Kavanaugh in the hopes of winning in 2020.

Tomorrow should be really interesting.