We’re All Making History

Readability

We're All Making History

[cap­tion id=“attachment_112505” align=“aligncenter” width=“300”] Jean Miélot[/​caption]

by baldilocks

A tad mor­bid, but this is some­thing to con­sider, and not just with Facebook.

The num­ber of dead Face­book users could out­num­ber the liv­ing by 2070, leav­ing a vast archive of such his­tor­i­cal impor­tance that archivists should be brought in to con­serve the data, Oxford Uni­ver­sity has said.

Cur­rently the global social media site has around 2.27 bil­lion mem­bers, but 1.4 bil­lion will die before 2100, accord­ing to the new calculations.

For cer­tain, the major­ity of those now liv­ing will be gone by then.

It means that within around 50 years the num­ber of dead could pass the liv­ing, in a mile­stone that has impor­tant impli­ca­tions for what should hap­pen with such a huge dig­i­tal legacy. (snip)

Cur­rently, after a per­son dies a Face­book account is memo­ri­al­ized unless the user has selected “delete after death” in their set­tings. The word “remem­ber­ing” is placed next to the pro­file name and a “legacy con­tact” is appointed to look after the page.

It allows friends and fam­ily to view pub­lic posts made before their death and also post memories.

The OII [Oxford Inter­net Insti­tute] is call­ing on Face­book to invite his­to­ri­ans, researchers and archivists to devise a way to curate the archives so they are not lost to future generations.

Per­son­ally, I have des­ig­nated three fam­ily mem­bers to han­dle my Face­book account should I sud­denly move on to the next world.

Read­ing this piece, I began think­ing of all the con­nec­tions I’ve made over nearly two decades – sev­eral of whom I’ve met per­son­ally and cared about very much – who are no longer with us. I’ve been blog­ging since 2003, so the list is becom­ing longer. Such is life … and death. And here’s some­thing else to think about.

Mr. Ohman [doc­toral can­di­date for the OII] added: “Data from social media dif­fers from tra­di­tional his­tor­i­cal data, not only in terms of the con­tent, but also in terms of the quantity.

What we know about peo­ple in the past is basi­cally based on men with power, who could pre­serve infor­ma­tion about them­selves to future generations.

But we know way less about the thoughts and daily lives of the mil­lions of women, work­ers and other mar­gin­al­ized groups in his­tory. With social media as an his­tor­i­cal asset, we have a chance not to repeat this mistake.”

I’m not one to worry about what the world will think of me while I’m still breath­ing, much less after I’m gone. But I think that this is a great jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for Face­book, etc. to allow his­to­ri­ans into its archives. Think­ing about my own fam­ily, I know almost noth­ing about the per­son­al­i­ties and thoughts of my ances­tors for obvi­ous rea­sons. But present and future gen­er­a­tions can get a glimpse into the lives of their 21st cen­tury fore­bears not only through Social Media, but from those of us who blog.

I like that idea. And, though I have no chil­dren, I’d like my Nth grand-​nieces and –nephews to know more about me than I know about those who came before me.

Ain’t tech­nol­ogy great?

Oh, by the way, be sure to reg­u­larly down­load your social media and blog archives. You never know if you’re about to be de-​platformed by those who want to keep the mak­ing of his­tory all to themselves.

Juli­ette Akinyi Ochieng has been blog­ging since 2003 as baldilocks. Her older blog is here. She pub­lished her first novel, Tale of the Tigers: Love is Not a Game in 2012.

Fol­low her on Face­book, Twit­ter, MeWe, and Gab.

Hit Da Tech Guy Blog’s Tip Jar or hit Juliette’s!

Jean Miélot

by baldilocks

A tad morbid, but this is something to consider, and not just with Facebook.

The number of dead Facebook users could outnumber the living by 2070, leaving a vast archive of such historical importance that archivists should be brought in to conserve the data, Oxford University has said.

Currently the global social media site has around 2.27 billion members, but 1.4 billion will die before 2100, according to the new calculations.

For certain, the majority of those now living will be gone by then.

It means that within around 50 years the number of dead could pass the living, in a milestone that has important implications for what should happen with such a huge digital legacy. (snip)

Currently, after a person dies a Facebook account is memorialized unless the user has selected “delete after death” in their settings. The word “remembering” is placed next to the profile name and a “legacy contact” is appointed to look after the page.

It allows friends and family to view public posts made before their death and also post memories.

The OII [Oxford Internet Institute] is calling on Facebook to invite historians, researchers and archivists to devise a way to curate the archives so they are not lost to future generations.

Personally, I have designated three family members to handle my Facebook account should I suddenly move on to the next world.

Reading this piece, I began thinking of all the connections I’ve made over nearly two decades – several of whom I’ve met personally and cared about very much – who are no longer with us. I’ve been blogging since 2003, so the list is becoming longer. Such is life … and death. And here’s something else to think about.

Mr. Ohman [doctoral candidate for the OII] added: “Data from social media differs from traditional historical data, not only in terms of the content, but also in terms of the quantity.

“What we know about people in the past is basically based on men with power, who could preserve information about themselves to future generations.

“But we know way less about the thoughts and daily lives of the millions of women, workers and other marginalized groups in history. With social media as an historical asset, we have a chance not to repeat this mistake.”

I’m not one to worry about what the world will think of me while I’m still breathing, much less after I’m gone. But I think that this is a great justification for Facebook, etc. to allow historians into its archives. Thinking about my own family, I know almost nothing about the personalities and thoughts of my ancestors for obvious reasons. But present and future generations can get a glimpse into the lives of their 21st century forebears not only through Social Media, but from those of us who blog.

I like that idea. And, though I have no children, I’d like my Nth grand-nieces and -nephews to know more about me than I know about those who came before me.

Ain’t technology great?

Oh, by the way, be sure to regularly download your social media and blog archives. You never know if you’re about to be de-platformed by those who want to keep the making of history all to themselves.

Juliette Akinyi Ochieng has been blogging since 2003 as baldilocks. Her older blog is here.  She published her first novel, Tale of the Tigers: Love is Not a Game in 2012.

Follow her on Facebook, Twitter, MeWe, and Gab.

Hit Da Tech Guy Blog’s Tip Jar or hit Juliette’s!