Last week a person on Gab asked me to: “explain how to journalism” I replied with seven points
1. Write the truth as you see it
2. Don’t be afraid to admit a screw up.
3. Say what you think, let the other guy do so too.
4. Never edit an interview dishonestly.
5. Don’t get angry over critique
6. remember being wrong isn’t the same as being evil
7. be open about your biases
I think that hold up pretty well, and I’d add one thing for the sake of CNN’s Anderson Cooper who just spent the last hour saying there’s no evidence of any voter fraud in NH.
8. Remember Choosing not to cover a story doesn’t make it not exist.
That’s important because while CNN and the left totally ignored voter fraud stories out of NH, Granite Grok the premiere political blog of the state was on the job
Well, she’s got another opportunity for fame and misfortune. Elected house Democrat and Fiance Committee and party leader Cindy Rosenwald has the additional distinction of having allowed someone who is currently a regional field director for Virginia candidate for Governor Terry McAuliffe to register to vote from her home in Nashua last November.
Skip broke the story last night on the Grok. He nick-named Rosenwald’s 101 Wellington Street in Nashua home “The Rosenwald Rest Home for Wayward Voters.” I was thinking more along the lines of the “Rosenwald’s Vote Fraud Redoubt”, or “Cindy’s Nashua ballot Box Buffet- “Everyone leaves stuffed.”
I’m sure CNN has an intern or two who could go through those stories and maybe interview some of the groksters, but of course that wouldn’t be good for the narrative would it?
Incidentally I wrote about this back in 2013, where was CNN then?
I spoke to Skip Murphy of Granite Grok about Election night in New Hampshire and what happens next
and briefly with Mike Rogers as well
I think interviews with significant bloggers from swing states would be quite interesting and informative, perhaps I should Try to raise $1500 to go to CPAC this year ($1000 for CPAC & $500 to make up for losing a week’s pay) and get that done.
I haven’t been in a couple of years, I think it would be worth a trip this year.
During the last election cycle the GOP won historic victories not only taking the US senate but winning the Governor’s seats in states as Blue as Maryland and Massachusetts.
However in 2014 the big exception to that rule was in New Hampshire where the national GOP imported Scott Brown to run much to the delight of the GOP leadership and the disgust of the base as Granite Grok put it at the time:
Those are two important planks in the NH GOP Platform. Another is that of “limited government” – and he voted for Dodd-Frank, the biggest intrusion of Government into business and our private lives evah (‘cepting Obamacare, natch) and we will blog about this in the future. And if they don’t show up to vote for Brown, they also aren’t showing up to vote for the other Republicans down ticket. But given the absolute “hugathon” for Brown that the Establishment Republicans have been drooling about for months now, I do wonder if it matters much to them about the folks just off stage instead of the one standing in the national Klieg lights. How many time have I written concerning Republicans with the insinuations that we ought to just leave and run on our own:
We may not win, but you will surely lose
Especially here in NH where win margins in a lot of districts can be very thin indeed, the NH GOP has to struggle get to 50%+1; all I’d have to do is persuade 1.5 to 2 points to not vote. And there are a lot of people out there that are no longer willing to vote for the lesser of two evils anymore.
Pro-Choice, Pro Gun Control, voted for Dodd-Frank: what’s the MAIN difference between Scott Brown and Jeanne Shaheen, NH GOP chair Jennifer Horn?
I predict…If Havenstein is the nominee, he will not win against Hassan and the Democratic machine. …We’ve seen this trend in so-called Republican landslide years. But either way, I am voting for neither of these “kinged” choices. And I can say with certainty that I am not alone in that sentiment.
So given that sterling record you would think the NH GOP establishment party chair Jennifer Horn would have learned her lesson and stayed out of the GOP Presidential primary.
New Hampshire GOP chairwoman Jennifer Horn seemed to have abandoned efforts to remain neutral in the 2016 GOP presidential primaries on Wednesday, taking the extraordinary step of attacking not just any GOP presidential candidate but the 2016 frontrunner for her own party’s nomination.
Because in a year when your GOP senator is running for re-election in what will be a tough race the last thing you need to do is demonize the current front runner for the party nomination.
Horn further attacked the voters who attend Trump’s rallies.
Hey it could be worse, they could be doing stupid things like trying to get Trump kicked of the ballot:
Now, along comes ol’ Fungus, so determined to damage the GOP that you’d think he was a Democrat plant, filing a complaint attempting to remove Trump from the NH ballot, due to expressed views inconsistent with the NHGOP platform. Shirley, he must be joking! Inconsistent? Like himself supporting the most liberal faux-Republicans? Like Morse and Bradley expanding Medicaid? Like Steve Duprey supporting Planned Parenthood? Like Juliana Bergeron supporting Gay Marriage? Like Shawn Jasper owned and operated by the Democrats?
I’m shocked that Scott brown & Walt Havenstein weren’t mentioned in that bit.
Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski, in a statement to the Union Leader, suggested that Cullen works for Ohio Gov. John Kasich, a Republican rival far behind Trump in the polls.
“Number one, Mr. Trump’s views do comport with the Republican Party and number two, from a constitutional stand point, there is such a thing as freedom of speech,” Lewandowski said. “To file such a document against the person who is not only the frontrunner, but leading by tremendous margins is outrageous. If anything like this would ever happen Mr. Trump’s supporters would probably riot in the streets of New Hampshire. This is yet another attempt by the failed GOP establishment to keep Mr. Trump off the ballot because they know he is the only one who can Make America Great Again.”
In response to Lewandowski’s claim, Cullen said he is not working for Kasich, and that he so far remains uncommitted. He and his wife Jenny held a house party for Kasich last weekend. He has also held events for Jeb Bush and Lindsey Graham.
Mike Rogers nails it:
Methinks it is Trump who should be demanding a pledge of loyalty from the GOP! If this idiocy goes further up the food chain than Cullen, Trump will be liberated to run 3rd party, and will CRUSH the GOP’s chances – might even win without them. Sure, go ahead chumps, make his day!
I’m a Ted Cruz man I encourage all my NH friends to vote for him but I’ll tell you this, I’d enjoy watching the NH GOP Establishment collapse like the old man of the Mountain after A Trump win.
Yesterday I took a trip to Mike and Mar Mar Rogers house to cover a Ted Cruz House party.
Mike (of Granite Grok) and his wife have hosted many events over the years. Earlier this year I covered Ben Carson’s event but this one was the largest I’d seen, there were several tables of food, multiple tents including one for Granite Grok (which I was allowed to share) and a table at the front to allowed in registered guests.
This was the first time I’d ever seen either police or a security table but the draw here was large and included over 200 people (my count was 215 when the Senator started speaking which explained the 30 pizzas).
I arrived a couple of hours early and recorded parts of my podcast (emailed weekly to subscribers btw) including interviews with skip from Granite Grok, Mary Lotz, Frank Ardinger and others, but held back some space hoping for an interview with the Senator and to includes some audio from the event.
About 10 minutes before the event started Mar Mar invited those who helped with the event to Meet the Senator socially. While I had covered the senator on multiple occasions it was our first meeting socially and I was gratified that he remembered me from various events (The hat and scarf comes in real handy here) after which he came to the back yard to the crowd of 225.
Senator Cruz was preceded by a few speakers including local selectmen and was finally introduced by former NH Speaker Bill O’Neill after which he took the mic
Cruz spoke for about 25 minutes and gave pretty much his standard stump speech, he listed the things he would do on day one as president (revoke regulation, drop Iran deal, investigate planned parenthood and more) and on his long term goals. It was a message of optimism that we would be able to make a difference.
One the speech was done the Q & A came he took questions on the Trade Deficit
On the Iran Deal
On Power plant Closings
and on the Black Community
Unfortunately I violated a primary rule of mine and dug into the excellent spread so it was at this point that nature decided to call, however I had my USB microphone set up and the entire event was recorded in audio (available here)
At this point he sat down for an interview with Granite Grok when it was completed I asked for an interview but deferred when the Senator asked to greet the attendees first.
The sun was setting fast so I moved inside and set myself up in an area with some good light to be ready for him, but his handlers said at this point that they were running late and had no time, fortunately the Senator overruled them and sat down with me for six minutes (which for me is a long one).
You’ll notice the mic next to him, I used the recording from the Mic and a subsequent interview with Mike Rogers on the event for the Podcast.
Cruz continues his march forward slowly gathering support, he is using his money and grass roots support wisely and I suspect when we get to the end of the primary season he will still be standing because of it
Dr Carson answered a variety of questions on topics on various topics
He also answered two questions from me one on the Media’s Sudden Volte Face after the Prayer breakfast
And one at the end concerning getting up to speed on issues
Two things to note here. Dr. Carson started answering questions in daylight & finished after dark.
In this small informal setting Dr. Ben Carson answered more spontaneous questions on issues from the public than Hillary Clinton has in her entire campaign.
Think about it.
While it’s perfectly proper journalism to question any and all these positions (as friend Jazz Shaw does here) I think a bigger story is and continues to remain the contrast between Dr. Carson and indeed the whole GOP field compared to hiding Hillary Clinton.
If I was a an editor for a MSM network that is the story I would be advancing constantly.
The only pay I get from covering events like this comes from you.
If you want journalism owned by you instead of the left elites I would ask you to hit DaTipJar and help me pay for it.
My goal for 2015 is Twenty Two grand
That gets all the bills paid. (including my writers like Fausta) If I can get to Forty Thousand I can afford to travel outside of New England and/or hire me a blogger to help me get it done.
Consider Subscribing 100 Subscribers at $20 a month will get the job done.
The latest in our series of posts that will not surprise any person who has been paying attention.
Today’s installment comes a post from Granite Grok & a tweet from Boston Bridget on the Elections in NH.
While the GOP was winning Governorships in Illinois, Maryland and even Massachusetts and Republican Senate Candidates were winning every senate seat in sight at the very same time Maggie Hassan was beating Walt Havenstein holding the Governorship and Scott Brown was losing to Jeanne Shaheen.
So How did Havenstein manage to lose when the GOP was winning statewide? Granite Grok provides a clue
I can now tell the story – a meeting was set up, like back in 2010 with the leaders of the L&F wing of the Party with Papa Smurf (John Sununu Sr), for Havenstein. Walt arrived – and only 4 people were there instead of the scores that had been invited. Each and every one of them, including me, said “No apology, no support. We will not be used as cover; we will not be there”. It is my understanding that Havenstein was PISSED – he was the Nominee so how DARE he not get that support and stomped out redfaced when told the reasons. He assumed that votes would be there – you know what “assumed” means. A lack of Consistency.
Oddly it appears that if you use sexual slurs to describe your base and refuse to apologize said people choose not to show up and vote for you.
Unlike Haverstein Brown didn’t directly insult his voters but he did choose to emphasize positions his base hated:
Brown especially with his absolutely pandering in on-bended-knee-running to Shaheen’s Left on being “I’m more Pro-Choice than her!!!!” told another large group of normally Conservative Republicans “I don’t need you at ALL” – that would be the large Pro-Life voters to whom this issue IS their top issue if not their SINGLE issue when voting.
Mind you there were pragmatic people who tried for him. Boston Bridget is as pro-life as they come yet there wasn’t a person who worked harder to try and elect him north of the border but that didn’t move the faithful:
@DaTechGuyblog@GraniteGrok I talked to a young woman in NH who said that ppl in her church refused to vote for either Senate candidate.
In each of these candidates, not maintaining a Consistency with their base cost them. It should show that trying to replace that base with another, and being very untransparent about it, failed to create a Trust and you both lost votes.
Yeah but a lot of high paid GOP consultant said otherwise, and we all know they know a whole lot more than a blogger in a Fedoraand scarf.
There are less than 60 days to the year and to say things are tight financially around here is to say the Titanic had a bit of a leak but there isn’t a lot of money in telling GOP candidates things as they are rather than what they and the establishment want them to hear.
If you think this blog’s coverage and what we do here is worth your support please consider hitting DaTipJar below
Spock:Captain, I must have some platinum. A small block would be sufficient, five or six pounds. By passing certain circuits through there to be used as a duo-dynetic field core…
Capt. Kirk: [interrupting] Uh, Mr. Spock, I’ve brought you some assorted vegetables, baloney and a hard roll for myself, and I’ve spent the other nine tenths of our combined salaries for the last three days on filling this order for you. Mr. Spock, this bag does not contain platinum, silver or gold, nor is it likely to in the near future.
Spock: Captain, you’re asking me to work with equipment which is hardly very far ahead of stone knives and bearskins.
Star Trek, The City on the Edge of Forever 1967 1967
Public business must be done by somebody. If wise men decline it, others will not; if honest men refuse it, others will not.
The Groksters, writers / activists, have decided that Bob Smith is that person and who represents our values most closely and someone that we can lend one of our most valuable assets that we have as Citizens – our votes. In a representative democracy, our Constitutional Republic, there can be no higher accolade than to say “we believe you can do the job” and do so within the constraints of what the Constitution allows you to do as one that will be directing that level of Government. We believe that he is best suited to not only carry those values forward but also resist those that are infected with “Potomac Flu” – the philosophy that “Government knows best and should legislate our behavior”, and that special interest groups that “rent seek” from the Feds in “benefit for the few at the expense of the many”.
I wholeheartedly 2nd the Grok’s nomination of Senator Smith.
Grok declined to endorse in the congressional races and only gave endorsements in two state races. I disagree there, in NH 2nd district I like both Gary Lambert & Marelinda Garcia & either would make a fine addition to congress, but while Col Lambert is a solid choice I think however that Marelinda Garcia is someone special with great potential for the future.
This is, however to the Groksters about conservatism. They are not about to endorse non conservatives, particularly in a primary, nor waste time and efforts on people who are not going to get the job done or get along to go along. Many republicans feel the same and right now the GOP is starting to get worried because an election cycle that they should own is not looking like a wave after all. :
There are only seven Democrat-held districts that Mitt Romney carried in 2012 and only 19 others that President Obama won by fewer than double digits. That certainly leaves room for GOP growth, but in a normal wave year (like 2010, for example), you see dozens and dozens of winnable seats. For the GOP to expand the map beyond 20-25 winnable seats would take a massive wave.
As the GOP discovers their prospect for a wave are dropping the NH GOP sent out a letter urging the GOP to turn out after the primaries are over:
Vote in the general election for the Republican candidate, even if they were not who you voted for in the primary election. Staying home and/or not voting for a specific candidate/office is the same as voting for their opponent.
the letter further pointed out that if GOP voters didn’t stay home we wouldn’t have Barack Obama in office today.
about 31 million Republicans stayed home. If just 20% (6 million) of those had gone to the polls and voted for Romney, the outcome would have been different, we would have a much better individual in the White House and our country would be far better off than it is today.
That’s a pretty powerful argument, but Skip is having none of it:
Yup, scapegoating their voters – good job on gaining and influencing “friends”. You didn’t give those 31 million Republicans a good enough reason TO vote – and you are blaming them?
And demands better candidates if we expect him to turn out:
fix your brand first. Hint: let’s hear the Brand Manager and Protector, NH GOP Chair Jennifer Horn lambast “her own” (e.g., the Rogue Republicans in the NH Senate that pushed through the Democrat Agenda) first. Let us know of your ire in how THEY spoiled the brand and that you are the person that is gonna fix this.
He has a real point Mitt Romney didn’t just avoid giving a reason for those GOP voters to turn out he This is an argument that I made the week of Barack Obama’s re-election when the Romney campaign was willing to treat Barack Obama with kid gloves during the general while playing hardball vs conservatives :
there was the Mitt Romney of the primaries. The Mitt Romney that was willing to play hardball against his GOP foes, who was willing to confront them, attack them and go after them. That was the Mitt Romney who had no problem playing with the rules at state and national conventions to lock out Ron Paul voters who had learned the rules and played by them and then tossed them aside. This Mitt Romney and his team played hardball with conservatives figuring “Where are you going to go?”
The letter from the GOP suggest they might in This type of behavior had predictable results
In the words of Obama’s spiritual advisor (paraphrased): NH GOP’s “…chickens are coming home to roost!” The NH GOP is scared that people are going to not bother with the top of the ticket and that traditionally means that the down ticket candidates suffer.
This has to be addressed NOW. Scott Brown & the NH GOP’s problem is a lot like Mitch McConnell at CPAC he needs to address the elephant in the room which are his positions on life and guns because as of today those NH Republicans will not turn up and vote for Senator Brown in a general election.And if they don’t forget a senate seat in Washington, if they stay home the NHGOP can kiss the prospect of taking back the state house and senate goodbye in a year where Democrats in the state are running scared.
Skip is absolutely right, the New Hampshire GOP has not earned the respect of conservatives like him so they have a lot of nerve after kicking them in the balls to ask him for their support post primary for candidates that don’t appeal to their palate in the least….
….so I imagine it’s going to be a bit of a shock to the people who have read up to this point that that’s exactly what I’m going to urge Skip and my fellow conservatives in NH & elsewhere to do. I’m urging them to support the GOP nominees in the state and federal elections whoever they are. Why? Because while Skip’s point is strong it has a fatal flaw:
It’s like going to the store – why buy an inferior product when one was looking for excellence? Humphreys sounds like the Party is entitled to my vote simply because there is an R associated with my name.
Actually it not. During the Market Basket work action I was able to boycott Market Basket because there were other sources of food & supplies available for me to get the basics from so I could do without. An election is not like that. A candidate is going to be chosen, as John Adams put it: Public business must be done by someone and if you decide to give the power to the democrats they will take it.
It’s like those feminists who object to that date rape fingernail polish. No matter how principled your objections to it are, no matter how much you complain that you shouldn’t have to use such a product if you want to go drinking, that will be of little comfort if you wake up next to some strange bed wondering how you got there.
Conservatives are damn fools if they give power to liberal democrats because the republicans are asses. So what is the proper answer is Chip’s solution is not viable, well an excellent suggestion came from his compatriot Mike Rogers gave the answer Nov 9th 2012
The time to take over the GOP (state by state) or set up a real third party (let’s call it the conservative party, like NY state), is NOW, after a historic election that demonstrated the ineptness of the “Wizards of Smart”.The time NOT to talk about and vote for a third part candidate, or stay home and pout about rules that work against you is DURING an historic election, when one of the evils is immeasurably worse than the guy you can’t quite warm to.
This very day Skip & Co should be researching and preparing the paperwork for a New Hampshire conservative party or researching existing 3rd parties in the state so Tea Party & 2nd Amendment activists can shift to them en masse the day after the election. NH is a small state, such a move would have an earth shattering effect of the GOP state party and a sobering effect on their candidates and the direction they go.
Until that progressivism & liberalism have to be stopped or at least checked, even if we have to do it with alternatives that are little better than stone knives and bearskins.
If you think the coverage and commentary we provide here is worth your support please consider hitting DaTipJar below to meet our annual expenses.
With Mississippi’s Senate runoff taking place today most of the attention is going to the money flowing there but Granite Grok tells us that in NH-1 there are things going on that are rather interesting.
Dan Innis is running for the GOP nomination in NH-1.
Steve McDonald notes says he’s a nice guy and understands business but he has some interesting donation habits:
He did give 500.00 dollars to Jackie Cilley, she being the more extremist left wing Democrat in the 2012 primary race for governor. And yes, that was on WMUR yesterday, and Pindell noted that Innis donated to Cilley a month before she even officially announced. That means he donated to encourage her to run. He encouraged an extreme left-wing, pro tax and spend, Progressive liberal Democrat to be the fiscal and political boss of the state of New Hampshire.
we have a couple of old voter lists (2012 and 2013) of Rockingham Country voters so I just checked them for the heck of it and found that both of them have Mr. Innis as a registered “undeclared”. As recent as March 2013 he was still undeclared. Apparently, he became a Republican some time last summer or in early fall just in time to declare his candidacy. This is the Establishment guy and I am very offended that after all the years of fighting Democrats [my Party] now wants me to support one… I think he is laughing his ass off at us being this dumb…
Now as a rule you want people to change to your party but questions are being asked as to who got this change going:
There has been some debate about who encouraged Innis to change his party registration or to run as a Republican? The current favorite is someone named Peter T. Paul.Paul throws a lot of money around. He has donated to Republicans, including Lamontagne, Smith, Stiles, and Ayotte. And he has donated to Democrats, mostly in California, but he did donate to Jeanne Shaheen and a few others. His giving appears entirely political, not ideological. He lightly feathers whatever nests he may later need a sliver of access. Lightly, being donations in the $1000.00 to $3000.00 dollar range, nothing too significant, nothing to set off any alarms.
Now that’s a Tad odd, why would a guy who supports Democrats and Republicans be encouraging a fellow who leans left to switch parties & run as a Republican for congress and why would the party establishment embrace such a person for congress on the spot instead of say for state rep or senate first?
I was just looking at Outside spending on the Innis campaign,
A group called New Hampshire Priorities has spent 76,560.00 dollars on Dan Innis.
The sole contributor to New Hampshire Priorities is Peter T. Paul
New Hampshire Priorities is the Super PAC we talked about here, created by a California Banker to elect Dan Innis.
So you’ve got a single out of state Banker willing to sink tens of thousands of dollars into a candidate for congress in NH for the GOP when previously he has been spending a few thousand at a time on assorted candidates. No wonder the NH GOP establishment likes him! Green is their favorite color.
So who exactly is this Peter Paul guy? I presume he is not a Candy Bar Barron:
Early 2014 Peter T. Paul (for whom a UNH business school is named) drops half a million into a Super PAC to help Innis. Paul, by the way, has been fingered as a leader in the development of mortgage backed securities, which he appears to have profited from, whose failure inevitably resulted in the housing market collapse.
So we have a brand new Republican who is kinda a lefty being financed by a big money many to run in NH.
Nice guy not withstanding is this really what the GOP wants for the Granite State? Steve McDonald again
as disgruntled as I might be with the past performance of Frank Guinta, Innis should not be given the Republican nod to challenge Carol Shea-Porter, who is not much different from Jackie Cilley, whom Innis supported.
Sir Humphrey Appleby:So we trust you to make sure that your Minister does nothing incisive or divisive over the next few weeks.
Sir Arnold Robinson: Avoids anything controversial. Sir Humphrey Appleby: Expresses no firm opinion about anything at all. Now, is that quite clear? Bernard Woolley: Yes, well, I think that is probably what he was planning to do anyway.
Yes Minister Party Games 1984
Reporter #1 Was that a “Yes” or “No”?
Reporter #2 That was a possible “maybe”
The Best little Whorehouse in Texas 1982
Last year when Senator Scott Brown appeared in Nashua and a crowd of 2nd amendment people protested him I said he made a mistake by not engaging those voters directly, Brown is a reasonable man and as I recall when he was my senator always had time for his constituents no matter what their views.
Last week Senator Brown took my advice appearing in Hollis NH at the home of Granite Grok’s Mike Rogers with his lovely wife Gail to meet with a group of voters and make the case for him as the next Senator GOP senator from NH.
Mike regularly hosts candidates so people can meet and engage them and I’m often there to cover them. I missed this one but I commend Senator Brown for making the trip, but after reading the accounts of the event from Skip & Mike it seems that in giving said advice I left out an important point, something that is inherent to NH GOP politics that doesn’t come into play very often in Massachusetts.
In Massachusetts the GOP is so weak that conservatives are simply delighted to have a candidate contest a democrat in office. Furthermore Massachusetts is so left you have to go back to Henry Cabot Lodge in the 50’s to find a Massachusetts senator who occupied the seat Senator Brown did who was more conservative than he.
In other words in Massachusetts showing up, caucusing with the GOP and perhaps throwing them a vote now & then is enough to prove your GOP bonafides.
In NH it’s a different matter.
New Hampshire has a long strong GOP tradition. George Bush took the state in 2000, The GOP held the House and Senate just two years ago and if Scott Brown won the class two seat from Jeanne Shaheen not only would he be the most liberal Senator in that seat (other than Shaheen) since Democrat Thomas J. McIntyre in 1979 but with Kelly Ayotte in the Delegation he wouldn’t even be the most conservative senator serving the state.
To put in bluntly the New Hampshire GOP doesn’t need a savior. They have plenty of choices from Karen Testerman to Senator Bob Smith and Andy Martin to Senator Brown’s right to Jim Rubins to his left so being “not Jeanne Shaheen” doesn’t cut it. As Chip put it:
Note to Scott Brown: EVERY Republican is “the anti-Shaheen“. Yes, every candidate for US Senate this cycle is saying “I am the opposite of Shaheen”. Keep telling us that over and over will just lose its efficacy – and gets to be boring and eye-rolling. And again, it wasn’t just me that noticed (and this advice is worth every penny you paid). Stop being Captain Obvious over and over – it will help the stump speech.
All the questions went the same way -whether softball or hardball, they did not elicit any concrete statement of principle or philosophy, but just general platitudes about fixing broken Washington, and getting things done…
…After a few questions, I had a very uncomfortable feeling – like trying to look through a highly polished glass column to see the truth, or see inside a cloak of invisibility, or stand on a teflon floor in low gravity – in other words, it was impossible to get a grip on his positions on anything except “vote for me, I’m the lesser evil”.
Moreover if Senator Brown didn’t want to make a pitch for has candidacy based on deep held positions & principles for fear of trackers, he could have instead make the case for his candidacy pragmatically, to wit:
1. I am the person who can raise the most money, I can go dollar to dollar with Shaheen and force Democrats to spend money here that they would otherwise have available to defend house and senate seats elsewhere.
2. I have the highest name recognition on the GOP side thanks to years of coverage and the Boston Media. I could spend every cent of that superior war chest attacking Jeanne Shaheen rather than introducing or re-introducing myself to the electorate.
3. Since I served in the Senate at the same time as Senator Shaheen I can directly contrast my record to hers.
4. Senator Shaheen was the 60th vote for Obamacare As the person elected in Massachusetts as the 41st vote against Obamacare the ads practically write themselves.
5. Because I’m the most acceptable candidate to the national party I can draw national names and cash to the campaign that can not only help me but the GOP ticket all the way down.
6. Finally the Democrats are terrified of me. They will never get over me winning the “Ted Kennedy” seat in Massachusetts and inspiring candidates nationwide. They’re already spending money trying to define me and every dollar, every volunteer, every speaker and every phone call the party has to make to try to defend this Senate seat in NH is a dollar, a volunteer, a speaker and a phone call that is not being made to defend seats in Alaska, Louisiana, North Carolina, Arkansas etc etc etc.
Can someone explain why it it is left to a blogger who has endorsed Karen Testerman for the NH GOP Senate nomination to make this case when Senator Brown could have done the same in a house full of potential voters, contributors and campaign workers?
Maybe he figures an argument is not necessary. he’s a very pleasant man, with a good record in the Military, a nice family and a wife that is an incredible asset for a campaign. Combine that with the with money, name recognition and a divided GOP primary vote and I suspect expensive consultants who are chasing his big campaign chest might have advised him getting the nomination in an open primary state like NH is a fait accompli.
But what those consultants don’t seem to understand is even if they are right about the primary, it’s only half the battle. If he wins Senator Brown will need as many of those tea party conservatives as he can get come election day because the MSM is going to pull out all the stops to keep that NH seat a seat they figured on holding.
New Hampshire is not Massachusetts. and the Charles Durning dance simply won’t fly there.
The consultants who are telling Senator Brown to take no firm positions on issues are likely the same ones who asked him to run away from the base in 2012. Let me as a person who is not taking a penny of Senator Brown’s money (but will happily accept tip jar hits) say that if you actually want to win this election it’s better for you and the GOP both nationally and in NH if you actually stand for something. I’ll give the last word to Mark Steyn who said these words to NH republicans the day after Senator brown announced his exploratory committee….
We don’t want it to be like 2010, where it was a landmark election and nothing changed, and the way to prevent that is to move the meter from the public debate is. We are jeopardizing the future of United States by just stringing along in this way…You have to wait for a Tuesday in November to actually win the vote but you can win the argument every single day of the week, every month between now and election day.
Of course the NH GOP could just vote for Karen Testerman and win with her. Then GOP candidates running in NH House & Senate races throughout the state won’t have to explain away Brown’s positions that might keep the base they need home.
It’s Saturday. In 7 Hours I’ll be broadcasting live from the Nashoba Club Restaurant in Ayer Ma but no a less pleasant note with 19 hours left to the day we remain a full $222 away from meeting our weekly goal for the first time in nearly two months.
We need 9 tip jar hitters at $25 to end our losing streak and try to get us back on track, and it’s axiomatic that the establishment money isn’t going to come here and do it.
Let’s not start April in a hole, please hit DaTipJar below.
If 61 of you hit Subscribe at $20 a month subscribers this site will be able to cover its bills for a full year.