When Justin Trudeau decided to go to India, he must have tried to kill two birds with one shot, and dress up like Mr. Darcy in Bride and Prejudice:

You could say that Justin vaguely resembles Martin Henderson, who played Mr. Darcy in the 2004 film.

Trudeau has one of those faces: He also resembles a young Fidel Castro,

and he reminds me of one of my classmates at the University of Georgia (I wonder what became of him? But I digress).

Bride and Prejudice was rollicking good fun,

so Justin’s enthusiasm for Bollywood fancy dress must have carried to the rest of his family. Mrs Trudeau and the kids took off their shoes and joined in dressing up while in India.

Then they made thousands of tourists wait in the heat while they had their photo-ops.

It was not a good idea:



Looks like the Trudeaus studiously practiced “Namaste” in yoga class,

For years I worked with, and had neighbors and friends from India, but I don’t recall much Namaste-ing. Maybe we just didn’t feel like it.

The fancy dress didn’t go over well, but things got worse when the

Canadians had invited a Sikh separatist, now a Canadian citizen, convicted of the attempted murder of an Indian politician to a dinner with Trudeau at the Canadian High Commissioner’s residence in New Delhi. (It’s not clear how he obtained a visa to enter India.)

The Atlantic quotes,

Shivam Vij wrote in the Washington Post, “for Trudeau, this trip is all about the Sikh vote in Canada.”

It may be, but after the invitation was rescinded Trudeau finally got around to wearing a business suit. He wore Darth Vader socks to meet Prime Minister Modi, a Star Wars fan.

And the trip remains an embarrassment.

Fausta Rodríguez Wertz writes on U. S. and Latin America at Fausta’s blog. She’d love to visit India in her regular clothes.

Government advocate: One thousand five hundred and sixteen casualties with one thousand six hundred and fifty bullets.
Gen. Dyer: My intention was to inflict a lesson that would have an impact throughout all India.

Gandhi 1982

Monday Morning on Special Report with Brett Baier a representative of the Palestinians claimed in US television that Israel was deliberately targeting Palestinian civilians.

If you are ignorant enough you can look at the 500 dead (as of this writing) in Gaza you might fall for this line, but I’d like to introduce you to a witness who can without question prove the falsehood of this claim: The late General Reginald Dwyer.

95 years ago on April 13th 1919 General Dwyer led a contingent of about 90 men to Jallianwala Bagh where there was a large crowd of Indians some for protest and some for a local fair.

After deploying 50 of his men armed with bolt action Lee Enfield Rifles (First introduced in 1895) he opened fire on the crowd.  After expending aprox 1650 rounds his troops managed to inflict over 1500 casualties on the crowd with between 379 & 1000 dead depending on whose figures you believe.

Dyer never for one moment denied that he was deliberately targeting unarmed civilians, in fact Dyer actually had armored cars armed with machine guns but he was unable to bring them to bear. At the official inquiry he bluntly stated publicly that had he been able to deploy them he would have used them.

The scene was vividly portrayed in the 1982 movie Gandhi

This event is known as the Amritsar or the Jallianwala Bagh massacre.  It was a key moment in the Indian Independence movement.

What does this have to do with Gaza? Consider.

General Dwyer had 50 armed men, using 19th century bolt-action rifles and in only 15 minutes of deliberately targeting a civilian population inflicted 1500 casualties.

Israel has called up 40,000 men, they have deployed, jets, heavy artillery, tanks and all the weapons that a modern experienced 21st century army has at its disposal. For five days (as of this writing on Monday night) they have been fighting directly in Gaza and for several days before this, Israel was launching air and artillery strikes on Gaza.

Furthermore they are operating in an area where 1.8 million people live in an area of 139 square miles. A density of over 13,000 people per square mile.

So consider, if we are to believe the Arabs who are claiming on twitter, Facebook , in the Arab media and in front of every western camera that is put in front of them that Israel is deliberately targeting Palestinian civilians since day 1 , we have to conclude that the Israeli Army and Air Force, given a full week, are less efficient killers than 50 British soldiers armed with bolt-action rifles, introduced when Grover Cleveland was President of the United States, were in 15 minutes.

General Dyer, the dead of Amritsar and simple logic call such claims a nonsensical lie.

If however you still maintain the Palestinian/Arab line for anything other than political or social reasons I suggest installing a high quality e-mail filter because hundreds of Nigerian e-mail scammers are simply dying to meet you.


Olimometer 2.52

With 9 days to go we need $1100 to make this month’s goal.

If just twenty of you can hit DaTipJar for $50 or more July will end as a success.

If you think the coverage and  commentary we provide here is worth your support please consider hitting DaTipJar below and help keep the bills paid.

Consider the lineup you get In addition to my own work seven days a week you get John Ruberry (Marathon Pundit)  on Sunday Pat Austin (And so it goes in Shreveport)  on Monday  Tim Imholt on Tuesday,  AP Dillon (Lady Liberty1885) Thursdays, Pastor George Kelly Fridays,   Steve Eggleston on Saturdays with  Baldilocks (Tue & Sat)  and   Fausta  (Wed & Fri) of (Fausta Blog) twice a week.

If that’s not worth $20 a month I’d like to know what is?


Mr. Rickey, I thought when I signed the contract I signed for one thing. There is a ‘W’ column, and there is an ‘L’ column. I thought it was my obligation and duty to put as many as I could under that ‘W’ column.

Leo Durocher Nice Guys finish last.

Kirk: Mr. Spock, have you accounted for the variable mass of whales and water in your time re-entry program?

Spock: Mr. Scott cannot give me exact figures, Admiral, so… I will make a guess.

Kirk: A guess? You, Spock? That’s extraordinary!

Spock: [to Dr. McCoy] I don’t think he understands.

McCoy: No, Spock. He means that he feels safer about your guesses than most other people’s facts.

Star Trek IV 1986

I read (via Glenn) Tunku Varadarajan’s piece on Cricketer Sachin Tendulkar impending retirement a particular phrase jumped out at me.

In purely sporting terms, however, he is but a shadow of his old self, in which he shone as one of the three or four finest players cricket has produced in its long, languorous history. He is now merely a “good” or “better than average” player. Had he been only 24 and this proficient, he’d be an honest contender for a place on the national team. But he is now so much less good than he once was that, when he plays, the more dispassionate among us can see only an ugly gulf between Sachin’s apogee and his plateau.

Now I presume Mr. Varadarajan is a fan of Cricket in general & Mr Tendulkar in particular but that phrase in the middle of a piece on Mr. Tendulkar and graceful exits says more about Mr. Varadarajan that it does about Mr. Tendulkar and the team that plays him.

I freely admit that the source of my sparse knowledge of cricket  is an interest in the origins of baseball & my Doctor Who fandom (5th Doctor don’t you know) but I think I can explain the fallacy of this piece by quoting the Bill James Baseball Abstract (1985) page 359 where James critiques a negative evaluation of Brooks Robinson by another writer (full disclosure I’m a HUGE Brooks fan).

an analytical structure that reduces the player’s rank (of all time greats) for several years in a row, as it happened at the end of Robinson’s career, is irrational, because it assumes that the player is being used by a team for several seasons although he has negative value (not to mention that Robby was being used by a team that was winning 95 games a year). If a team is willing to play a player, then by definition that player must have value.

So if a player has value the question becomes: ‘What is that value’?  Is it as a draw selling tickets such as Babe Ruth for the Boston Braves? You’ve got to figure a legend like Tendulkar must sell tickets which can’t hurt when you have to sell tickets for a five day test.

But cash aside the real value of a player, if your goal is victory, is this measured by only one standard: Can I put a better player on the field who can help us win given the budget the team has?

And that’s where Brooks Robinson circa 1975 comes in.

That year Brooks had one of his worst years at the plate as a full time player.  In 539 at bats he hit only .201 with 6 homers and 54 RBIs a far cry from his 1964 MVP season when he hit .317 with 28 HR & 117 RBIs.

Yet his fielding stats were still impressive, his fielding percentage was a full 25 points above the league average at .979  range factors he would win his final gold glove at third and his WAR rating (wins above replacement) was 1.8  It was the lowest of his career but still positive meaning he had more value than a the player (Doug DeCinces) who would eventually replace him.

In 1976 & 77 his final years in the Majors as a part time aged 39 & 40 player Brooks Continued to out field DeCinces Aged 25 & 26 (.969 vs .941 in 76 & 1.000 vs .958 in 77) and didn’t have a lower range factor than him till his final year in the majors. But that defense couldn’t make up for a huge difference at the plate for those two years ( .211 Avg .307 slugging vs .234 Avg .357 slug in 76 & .149 Avg .255 slug vs .259 avg .433 slugging in 77) that finally caused him to be replaced.

What significant about those numbers is this:  DeCinces batting numbers in 76-77 those years are OK but nothing particularly special, one might even consider them below avg for a major league hitter but Brooks numbers at the plate were just plan awful.  Certainly not up to the standards of a player at the major league level.

If after 1975 Brooks Robinson produced merely average numbers at the plate such as he did in the 1972 season (.250 Avg with 8 HR 64 RBI and a slugging percentage of .342) he likely would have continued to start at third until his fielding numbers dropped or he decided he simply didn’t want to play anymore.

That brings back to Sachin Tendulkar Let me remind you of Mr. Varadarajan description of his current skills as a cricketer:

Had he been only 24 and this proficient, he’d be an honest contender for a place on the national team.

So Mr. Varadarajan doesn’t say Mr. Tendulkar skills have deteriorated to the point where he is a liability to his team. He doesn’t say he is still a good batsman but a liability in the field. No he says without equivocation that a 24-year-old with Mr. Tendulkar’s current skills would be an honest contender for the National Cricket Team of India.

For my readers who likely know little about cricket, A cricket team consists of 11 players not counting the bench.  There are 1.237 BILLION people in India. a large number of which likely dream of being on the National Cricket team when they were younger just as I dreamed of being Brooks Robinson as a kid.

I submit and suggest that if his skills are good enough to make the national team given the talent pool in India not only does he belong on the team but unless he just doesn’t want to play anymore he has no business retiring as he would be a solid player on any professional team in the country that would have him.

The problem here isn’t Mr. Tendulkar’s lack of skill but the expectations and others.

Mr. Varadarajan et/al might be disappointed that when Mr. Tendulkar he  goes to the Cricket Pitch he is no longer seeing the Babe Ruth or Hank Aaron of Cricket, but if they are seeing the Tony Oliva or Mike Napoli of Cricket neither they nor India’s team are being cheated.


Olimometer 2.52

Today starts a new week meaning a new chance to make not only the weekly paycheck to cover the mortgage and the Magnificent Seven but a new batch of news and events worth your time and effort.

We will as always do our best to bring you the best commentary and coverage of the weeks events as we can. And in return we ask for your eyes and patronage from 17 of you to the tune of $20

If you think that’s an equable exchange, please consider hitting daTipjar below