Lincoln statues under attack in the largest city in the Land of Lincoln

Lincoln: The Man in 2008

By John Ruberry

On Wednesday, in response to the summer riot in Chicago that nearly toppled a Christopher Columbus statue in Grant Park last month–it and another Columbus statue have been since placed in storage–Mayor Lori Lightfoot’s Chicago Monument Project revealed 41 monuments that “have been identified for public discussion.” 

The project’s web site cautions, in bold print no less, “No decisions have been made about the following monuments.”

Yeah, right. BS! Imagine that you work at a company where the annual reviews are conducted each December. But in June you are informed that you’ll soon have a mid-year review but then are told, “Don’t worry, nothing is wrong.” At that point a wise person will begin the process of résumé updating. 

The statues, reliefs, and plaques include monuments honoring four presidents, several memorials recalling the first Europeans to visit Chicago, Louis Jolliet and Father Jacques Marquette, as well as generals, a Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, and many public art pieces with Native American themes. And yes of course those two Columbus statues. Oh, if you are one of those people who believe Leif Ericsson was the real European discoverer of America don’t be smug. He’s on Lightfoot commission’s list too.

This not a list of shame. It’s a tragic shame that there is such a list.

Five of the 41 monuments are Abraham Lincoln statues–and there are five Lincoln statues in Chicago. Hmm. Widely considered by liberals and conservatives as the greatest American president, the Great Emancipator’s presence in Illinois is profound and inescapable. “Land of Lincoln” is emblazoned on every Illinois license plate as is Honest Abe’s visage. 

I live on Lincoln Avenue in a Chicago suburb–that street winds its way south into Chicago and Lincoln Park, where you’ll encounter what Andrew Ferguson in his book Land of Lincoln: Adventures in Abe’s America says is “what is generally thought to be the greatest Lincoln statue of the nineteenth century, a towering figure by Augustus Saint-Gaudens.” That makes this statue, generally referred to as Lincoln Standing although its formal name is Lincoln: The Man, a masterpiece. Yep, a masterpiece. So much so that it has been recast several times, and those Lincoln: The Man reproductions can be found in Parque Lincoln in Mexico City, Parliament Square in London, Forest Lawn Cemetery–Hollywood Hills, and the Lincoln Tomb in Springfield. Earlier this month Little Marathon Pundit and I visited the Detroit Institute of Arts, where we found one of the many miniatures of Lincoln: The Man

Of course back in Chicago the original artistic triumph is “under public discussion.” In Grant Park sits another targeted Saint-Gaudens work, Abraham Lincoln: Head of State.

Also troubling is the aforementioned Marquette and Jolliet memorials on this list. Jolliet, while crossing the Chicago Portage in what is now southwestern suburban Cook County, noted that it would be an excellent location for a canal, one that would connect the watersheds of the Great Lakes and the Mississippi River. Lincoln, while a member of the Illinois legislature, was a proponent of the Illinois-Michigan Canal, which opened 17 decades after the Marquette-Jolliet expedition. While that canal very well may have been built without either men, if it hadn’t, Chicago may have ended up like many other small cities on Lake Michigan, like Sheboygan, Wisconin. (Oh, I’ve been there–it’s a lovely place by the way.)

George Washington has two “nominations” from the Chicago Monuments Project, including his horseback statue in his namesake park. McKinley Park’s statue of William McKinley is in peril too. Does that mean their park names will be next? While Grant Park doesn’t have a Ulysses S. Grant statue–Lincoln Park does. He has a nomination too, as do his fellow union generals Phil Sheridan, on Sheridan Road no less, and John Logan, whose statue stands in Grant Park.  

Lori Lightfoot is a failed mayor in a city that is in clear decline. Failed mayor? She’s up for reelection in a little more than two years and already there is speculation as to who her opponents will be. Since I declared Chicago a city in decline last summer its retail cash cow, North Michigan Avenue, has been hit by the announment of two closings, a massive Gap store and Macy’s at Water Tower Place. Chicago’s streets are potholed disasters, there are omnipresent red-light cameras to contend with, the murder rate is soaring, as are the number of car jackings. Taxes are oppresive, and its financial millstone, the worst-funded municipal pension progam in the nation, has never been properly addressed. Oh, this appears to be a little thing but graffiti is no longer routinely cleaned up along Chicago’s expressways. The proliferation of kudzu-like graffiti foreshadowed New York City’s descent in the 1970s.

Instead Lightfoot zooms in on statues and monuments to pander to her leftist base. 

The ultimate responsibility for this real-life dystopia of course goes to Chicago’s misguided voters. What was it that H.L Mencken said of democracy? Ah yes, here it is, “Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard.”

Chicago voters are a special kind of common people it seems

That being said there has been surprisingly little anger here in the Chicago area about these possible monument removals, as coverage has been modest and a major snowstorm earlier last week, on top of another one, had people focused on more immediate needs. 

But that needs to change. Click here on the Chicago Monuments Project web site to offer your thoughts. As always, please be polite–but be firm too. The form asks for a ZIP code. A Chicago one will make you more acceptable to those reading the replies; choose any 606 ZIP code between 60601 and 60661. Just saying.

John Ruberry regularly blogs at Marathon Pundit. He has visited Lincoln’s birthplace, his Springfield home, Ford’s Theatre, and the Peterson House, where our 16th president passed away.

5 thoughts on “Lincoln statues under attack in the largest city in the Land of Lincoln

  1. Lincoln killed a million Americans in his lust for power. He fought a war where one could have been avoided. Only the uneducated are unwilling to acknowledge that the passage of the Constitution required that the demand of three states that they could leave the union at any time for any reason made session not only legal but a clear option that Lincoln choose to ignore.

    Can’t think of anyone’s statue I’d rather have torn down. Even the odious Marx in NYC never killed a million Americans, forty million Russians and a hundred million others but not Americans.

    1. I have to disagree, not only was the war inevitable as the events of the previous 40 years had shown but it was Davis’ advisers who had advised “Strike a blow” to force the issue.

      And while the Obama/Biden sensibilities of today had no problem with Americans shot at and killed (seen Benghazi) the sensibilities of that age were of a different sort.

      1. War was avoided for 40 years due to compromise. War became inevitable after each compromise was negated by radicals in the North. Remember the fugitive slave act, with states defying the government’s laws war became inevitable as moderates learned that good faith was dead and agreements were made to be broken. Moderates were forced to choose sides as the radical north pushed more and more radical measures even financing Brown’s attempt at starting a slave war.

        Ominous parallels today, big corporations donating 890 million to BLM and 130 million to Antifa. SCOTUS saying elections can be stolen. A media that makes Uncle tom’s Log Cabin look like the unvarnished truth.

        If war was inevitable in 1861 surely it is today. Lincoln did what no other nation in the world has ever done. He caused a war to end slavery something no other nation has ever thought necessary.

        Its a free country. One can hold different opinions, at least for a while. Shortly we will have a politburo because of people who do not know nor understand history.

  2. I got this idea a while back that someone with a bit of money (more than me!) should but a big plot of land and them gather up all these statures that are being dismantled and removed, and then erect them on the plot of land. Call it “The Garden of Abandoned Statues” or something like that and charge admission to pay for upkeep. I’ll bet there are dozens or hundreds of these statues, plus crosses, 10 Commandments, and other displays that have been removed from public property. There might even be people with an interest in funding the relocation. Probably just stay a pipe dream, though.

  3. Conservatism has supported virtually open borders for the last 40 years, at least, this is the end result. The old people has been replaced by a new people who are not going to honor (except perhaps in museums) the laws, traditions, and heroes of the old. Indeed, such laws, traditions, and heroes are a threat to them since it reminds their victims of what they have lost and presents a possible rallying point for political resistance in the future, so they must go. This is the classic and inevitable effect of colonialism, of the taking over of a territory by an outside group, it’s happened countless times throughout history. This is the big picture and root cause of the present day chaos. Conservatism can’t deal with reality and so presents this byproduct of the mass movement of peoples as just a tactical leftist “outrage of the day.” It isn’t going away. You either keep your territory or you cease to exist, this is the brutal reality of history that the fairy tale of civic nationalism has lulled conservatives into forgetting.

Leave a Reply