ReadabilityA little LBJ and a Lot of Panic for Obama
If you do EVERYTHING You’ll win
Lyndon Johnson
Lyndon Baines Johnson only lost one election, that was a special election for Senate in 1941. Johnson campaigned hard and furious, spent an incredible amount of money, used some brilliant strategy and stole a fair amount of votes in corrupt counties that his allies controlled, but as told by Robert Caro in the first volume of his LBJ magnum opus Lyndon Johnson the Path to Power, Johnson made a rookie mistake. He found himself so confident on election day that he gave permission for some of the counties he controlled to report results early. This telegraphed to the liqueur interests desperate to get Pappy O’Daniel (a prohibitionist) out of the Governor’s mansion, the number of votes they would need to steal in corrupt areas not controlled by Johnson to win.
Johnson would never let anyone out hustle or out steal him again. He ran his future elections by his rule and would know only victory from that point on until the presidential primaries of 1960. W
Which takes us to 2012…
I have stated for quite a while that Obama is going to lose spectacularly and that conservatives should be confident not worried (ride right through them they’re demoralized as hell and all that). In that spirit I was pleased to see Kevin Jackson’s latest post (buy his book) suggesting Obama is panicking.
There are reasons why he should be panicked but looking at his list I have to disagree with Kevin on an important point.
Supporting Super Pacs, launching Spanish Web Sites, the Truth Teams and shifting right are all prudent things. Obama needs the money to win, the Spanish vote is very important (particularly after his dis of the Catholic church), the “Truth Teams” no matter how much they backfire are a logical tactic and shifting right will hurt him very little since the left assumes that any such pronouncements (such as opposition to gay marriage) are lies for public consumption.
Assuming he has the recourse he claims the investment in all these groups is wise, to quote a coach accused of running up a football score
“It’s not my job to stop me from scoring. It’s his,”
So none of those items in my mind constitute panic, they are instead a wise application of LBJ’s election rule.
There is one item on his list that doesn’t just suggest panic, it screams it.
One might argue that Black Americans might not be as motivated as they were in 2008. After all Obama’s re-election would not be nearly as historic as his initial election but even so the launching of African American’s for Obama sends a very interesting signal.
If the black vote was historically more evenly divided then forming such a group might seem prudent, but Democrats routinely take nearly 90% or more of the black vote. If This president feels the need to form an “African Americans for Obama” it is pretty telling.
Let’s do the math, Blacks make up 11% of the population. In 2004 Kerry took 88% of the black vote that accounted for 11% of the total vote. That 9.7% of the popular vote for the democratic candidate vs 1.3% for the GOP. A net 8.4% for the democratic candidate.
In 2008 President Obama took 96% of the black vote that consisted of 13% of the electorate, that adds up to in terms of the popular vote.12.5 vs .5% for the GOP a net of 12% for the Democrats.
The difference between the two is a net 3.6% of the vote. Now in terms of The popular vote 3.6% would still give Obama the edge if all things remain equal to 2008, but all things aren’t equal.
One can rationally assume that even if this president is less popular among the black community than he once was he would still easily outdraw John Kerry among Black voters. So lets say that the president gets 92% of the black vote this time 4 points better than Kerry but three points worse than last time and crunch the numbers.
If the black turnout is 11% the split is 10% Obama vs 1% RomneySantorumGingrichPaul +9% for the dems
If the black turnout is 12% the split is 11% Obama vs 1% RomneySantorumGingrichPaul +10% D
If the black turnout is 13% the split is 12% Obama vs 1% RomneySantorumGingrichPaul +11% D
So Obama would naturally get a +9 to a +11 even if his popularity drops with the black electorate by a full 3 points.
Or alternatively if his popularity doesn’t drop but the black turnout does, what are the numbers
If black turnout drops to 12% at 96% the split is 11.4% to .6% a difference of 10.8
If black turnout drops to 11% at 96% the split is 10.6% vs .4% a difference of 10.2
If black turnout drops to 10% (unlikely) at 96% the split is 9.6% vs .4% a difference of 9.2
Given these figures and estimates at worst the black community will provide a +9% for Obama and at Best +11 a difference on only 1 – 3 points of a vote that he won by 7.2 points.
Yet given these figures the Obama administration finds the need to invest time and money in a “African-Americans for Obama” organization where the return potential return is from such a venture is miniscule statistically. That suggests one or both of the following:
1. Press reports about the weakness of the current GOP field not withstanding the Obama administration understands the GOP is united in their dislike of his policies and their base, which was largely absent from John McCain’s corner is highly motivated to turn out decreasing the overall impact of the black vote.
2. The rumors of dissatisfaction of the black community with president Obama are not rumors but fact and even the prudent estimates I have given overstates his popularity among African-Americans requiring immediate action to motivate the uninspired and pressure the wavering to make sure Black turnout doesn’t drop.
This means that for all the propaganda driven by the left the Obama administration knows it is in deep trouble and needs every vote it can persuade, browbeat, buy or steal to keep it in office after Jan 20th 2013.
I don’t know what it tells you but I know what it tells me:
Simply amazing
Update: Instalanche, thanks Glenn helps me toward that Millionth hit for next month hopefully.
If you do EVERYTHING You’ll win
Lyndon Johnson
Lyndon Baines Johnson only lost one election, that was a special election for Senate in 1941. Johnson campaigned hard and furious, spent an incredible amount of money, used some brilliant strategy and stole a fair amount of votes in corrupt counties that his allies controlled, but as told by Robert Caro in the first volume of his LBJ magnum opus Lyndon Johnson the Path to Power, Johnson made a rookie mistake. He found himself so confident on election day that he gave permission for some of the counties he controlled to report results early. This telegraphed to the liqueur interests desperate to get Pappy O’Daniel (a prohibitionist) out of the Governor’s mansion, the number of votes they would need to steal in corrupt areas not controlled by Johnson to win.
Johnson would never let anyone out hustle or out steal him again. He ran his future elections by his rule and would know only victory from that point on until the presidential primaries of 1960. W
Which takes us to 2012…
I have stated for quite a while that Obama is going to lose spectacularly and that conservatives should be confident not worried (ride right through them they’re demoralized as hell and all that). In that spirit I was pleased to see Kevin Jackson’s latest post (buy his book) suggesting Obama is panicking.
There are reasons why he should be panicked but looking at his list I have to disagree with Kevin on an important point.
Supporting Super Pacs, launching Spanish Web Sites, the Truth Teams and shifting right are all prudent things. Obama needs the money to win, the Spanish vote is very important (particularly after his dis of the Catholic church), the “Truth Teams” no matter how much they backfire are a logical tactic and shifting right will hurt him very little since the left assumes that any such pronouncements (such as opposition to gay marriage) are lies for public consumption.
Assuming he has the recourse he claims the investment in all these groups is wise, to quote a coach accused of running up a football score
“It’s not my job to stop me from scoring. It’s his,”
So none of those items in my mind constitute panic, they are instead a wise application of LBJ’s election rule.
There is one item on his list that doesn’t just suggest panic, it screams it.
One might argue that Black Americans might not be as motivated as they were in 2008. After all Obama’s re-election would not be nearly as historic as his initial election but even so the launching of African American’s for Obama sends a very interesting signal.
If the black vote was historically more evenly divided then forming such a group might seem prudent, but Democrats routinely take nearly 90% or more of the black vote. If This president feels the need to form an “African Americans for Obama” it is pretty telling.
Let’s do the math, Blacks make up 11% of the population. In 2004 Kerry took 88% of the black vote that accounted for 11% of the total vote. That 9.7% of the popular vote for the democratic candidate vs 1.3% for the GOP. A net 8.4% for the democratic candidate.
In 2008 President Obama took 96% of the black vote that consisted of 13% of the electorate, that adds up to in terms of the popular vote.12.5 vs .5% for the GOP a net of 12% for the Democrats.
The difference between the two is a net 3.6% of the vote. Now in terms of The popular vote 3.6% would still give Obama the edge if all things remain equal to 2008, but all things aren’t equal.
One can rationally assume that even if this president is less popular among the black community than he once was he would still easily outdraw John Kerry among Black voters. So lets say that the president gets 92% of the black vote this time 4 points better than Kerry but three points worse than last time and crunch the numbers.
If the black turnout is 11% the split is 10% Obama vs 1% RomneySantorumGingrichPaul +9% for the dems
If the black turnout is 12% the split is 11% Obama vs 1% RomneySantorumGingrichPaul +10% D
If the black turnout is 13% the split is 12% Obama vs 1% RomneySantorumGingrichPaul +11% D
So Obama would naturally get a +9 to a +11 even if his popularity drops with the black electorate by a full 3 points.
Or alternatively if his popularity doesn’t drop but the black turnout does, what are the numbers
If black turnout drops to 12% at 96% the split is 11.4% to .6% a difference of 10.8
If black turnout drops to 11% at 96% the split is 10.6% vs .4% a difference of 10.2
If black turnout drops to 10% (unlikely) at 96% the split is 9.6% vs .4% a difference of 9.2
Given these figures and estimates at worst the black community will provide a +9% for Obama and at Best +11 a difference on only 1-3 points of a vote that he won by 7.2 points.
Yet given these figures the Obama administration finds the need to invest time and money in a “African-Americans for Obama” organization where the return potential return is from such a venture is miniscule statistically. That suggests one or both of the following:
1. Press reports about the weakness of the current GOP field not withstanding the Obama administration understands the GOP is united in their dislike of his policies and their base, which was largely absent from John McCain’s corner is highly motivated to turn out decreasing the overall impact of the black vote.
2. The rumors of dissatisfaction of the black community with president Obama are not rumors but fact and even the prudent estimates I have given overstates his popularity among African-Americans requiring immediate action to motivate the uninspired and pressure the wavering to make sure Black turnout doesn’t drop.
This means that for all the propaganda driven by the left the Obama administration knows it is in deep trouble and needs every vote it can persuade, browbeat, buy or steal to keep it in office after Jan 20th 2013.
I don’t know what it tells you but I know what it tells me:
Simply amazing
Update: Instalanche, thanks Glenn helps me toward that Millionth hit for next month hopefully.
[...] in January I noted the Obama campaign found the need to reach out to black voters The rumors of dissatisfaction of the black community with president Obama are not rumors but fact [...]
[...] we aren’t even going to talk 2012 from African Americans for Obama, the Soviet tactics the Gay Marriage implosion and finally the Kimberlin crowd’s attempt to [...]
[...] later today at the Minority Report & The Conservatory I go through example after example after example to support this [...]
[...] this is the same president who found it necessary to form “African American’s for Obama” likely because he understands what kind of conversations are taking place in the black [...]
[...] Remember this? Given these figures and estimates at worst the black community will provide a +9% for Obama and at [...]
After some reflection, I think that the extreme number of out of town trips by Michelle on the taxpayer’s dime is a sign that she’s “getting while the gettin’ is good.” In other words, she doesn’t expect to be able to enjoy the perks much longer.
[...] about people already motivated, who were motivated even before 2009. This is no different from the African-Americans for Obama business. It’s a waste of resources for little [...]
Obama deserves another 4 years because he is the one we’ve been waiting for!
[...] Posted by Rodney GravesIn which Datechguy posits that Obama and his campaign are in a panic. A little LBJ and a Lot of Panic for ObamaBy DatechguyThere is one item on his list that doesn’t just suggest panic, it screams it.One might [...]
The factor you’re ignoring is turnout; Obama doesn’t just want blacks to vote for him, he needs them to show up in the first place. I’d guess 90%+ (probably 95%+) are going to vote for him no matter what; but turnout matters a lot more than that 5%.
It should be remembered that “black” is not racial or ethnic, but cultural, and at that has essentially no connection with past or present African cultures, but is a confection compounded of 1960s progressives buying souls and 1960s ghetto gang leaders willing to sell…their followers’.
Obama is not “black”; half American of European ancestry, half Arabized African, and all Red diaper baby, his upbringing was a eclectic mix of everything BUT black. His marrying an arguably black woman and spending decades attending a black church can be seen as attempts to gain “street cred” with actual blacks. “African-Americans for Obama” is a desparation move, but not of the sort you suggest; it shows that blacks begin to realize that Obama is no more one of “them” than is a Fijian.
A third possibility is Obama’s version of the Bush 2004 strategy of squeezing out every vote possible from the base. Inciting class warfare and resentment, unleashing “Congregation Captains,” and playing the racial solidarity card may all have the effect of raising black turnout and increasing the percentage of the vote.
The effort to turn out the black vote ultimately is a futile effort. Those districts will always vote for Obama. He has to reach out to the middle to win but the need to shore up his base is debilitating. This is going to be a highly entertaining campaign.
Republicans don’t hate Obama, Obama hates America.
Wow — that’s some powerful stuff Vinny B.’s smoking. Does he know paranoia is one of the side effects?
I expect these efforts to,suppress the black vote to continue right through election day. If the criminal Republicans weren’t sending this country into a racist frenzy over Obama, he’d be re-elected in a bigger landslide than the one he put on Bush. Look at Fox News, always showing pictures of Obama to remind you he is black, and always talking about “negative growth” under Obama. What is “negative growth?”. Yeah, if you taking the beginning of each, have “negro” so obviously it is racial code. And look at how Republicans talk up Ford for not taking government help. What is Ford known for pickups? Again, racial code that Republicans want to drag blacks like Mr. Byrd. Aft Obama wins big in November, when the American people roar with approval for free health care they are entitled to and for the end of tax cuts for the rich, you Republicans will be even angrier than you are now at having to listen to the black president.
Good parody of a deranged Demo!
You may want to consider switching to decaf.
Fox News shouldn’t show pics of Obama because it reminds people he’s black? I assume the same rule should then apply to CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, etc.
I seem to remember the phrase “negative growth” from economics classes in high school in the early ’80s.
You forgot that Ford is also known for the Mustang. Incidentally, the pick-up that dragged Mr. Byrd was a Chevrolet.
“Racial code”? Well, when you can’ find any actual evidence of racism, I guess you have to start looking for “codes”.
“Entitled” to health care? You most certainly are. But I shouldn’t have to pay for yours (yes, through taxes collected)
“Tax cuts for the rich”? I’m not even going to bother with that stupidity, as it is well covered elsewhere.
And after Obama loses big in November, try not to scream too loudly when the next administration repeals a good chunk of the Obama agenda in an effort to repair all the damage he’s done.
Playing the race card so soon is self defeating. Keep it up.
Vinnie, there’s a somewhat simpler explanation for the news showing photos of Obama than “to remind people he’s black.” The news shows photos of Obama because he’s the president. Get it? Coverage of the president shows photos of the president. It’s so simple it’s brilliant, really.
I have another possible reason: what if Obama is just so awash in money he doesn’t know where to put it all? Waste a little here, waste a little there…I hope you’re right but I donno…
I think you have misinterpreted the purpose of the formation of BlacPac. (my moniker) BlacPac is Obama’s continued “stick-it-in-your-eye” behavior which he has been pulling throughout his Administration. He knows that he is operating by benefit of the double standard. Whites can’t form “Whites for Romney” or “European-Americans for Gingrich.” He has no intention of being the President of all the people. From the beginning, he’s had no shame working extra hard to piss people off. When he had the opportunity to create good will, he said, “Sorry, I won.” This has continued unabated from then on.
I call this his “Pressure Cooker” strategy. The latest group to piss off are the Catholics. All of this is to raise the pressure in his political cooker. The point is to have the culture explode whereupon he will have the perfect emergency to end America as we know it and as we are constituted. Individual rights? Screw that. “Sorry, I won.” It’s back to the pre-Enlightenment, Marxist/tribal mentality.
I don’t see any evidence that he’s conducting himself according to politics like we know it to be. Reality doesn’t figure into it. He’s all about destroying the individual in favor of the collective run by his gang.
I live in a deep south state in a county that is 33% black. Even with historic turnout, the number of blacks voting in 2008 in my county did not get much above 55%. My black politician friends were disgusted. As one told me, “Black people don’t vote, even when it means something”. This is why you see such measures as walking around money on election day and the frequent scandals involving absentee ballots in the black community: frustration by the black leadership with their own. I would say that creating an African-Americans for Obama is pretty much a sane thing to do.
It would be a little too cheeky to start a group/website called ‘African Americans for RomneySantorumGingrichPaul’ But how about “Formerly Employed African Americans Sitting It Out’
My fantasy on Election Night:
Anchorman to Correspondent in DNC HQ: “Can you describe the mood among Democrats where you’re at?”
Correspondent: “Denial…anger…bargaining…depression…acceptance….”
I don’t think they’re demoralized; they know the black community will turn out for them no matter what. African Americans for Obama is really about keeping the white guilt going.
AA for Obama won’t “keep white guilt going.” It’s exactly the sort of ethnic politics that will shift whites away from him.
The nuclear bomb on this is going to be when Fisher v. Texas comes back invalidating affirmative action and Obama has to go to the mat defending a policy that virtually all independent voters oppose.
The recession has hit the African American community very hard. They don’t all buy it that it was all Bush’s fault.
Blacks who turnout will vote for Obama, but I expect them to be a smaller part of the electorate than in 2000 or 2004. A recent pajamas media poll showed black support for obama at 80% with 5% undecided and the rest supporting the Republican candidate. The sample of blacks was small, so the MOE for that demographic was large, which means more polls are required to validate that result.
For the last 40 or so years, between 10%-12% of black voters have supported the Republican. In 2008 that percentage fell to 5%. I have seen a number of interviews with various conservative blacks who admitted that despite their deep disagreements with Obama’s policies they voted for him anyway simply because at an emotional level they felt compelled to so do. That group will not feel that compulsion in 2012. I would expect that 10% to largely reassert itself and black turnout to fall.
Unfortunately, none of the “front-runners” (excepting Newt) has either the moral character or courage to take it to Obama. Mitt Romney has to this point, refused to run against Obama…
…every time Newt does his poll numbers RISE…that right, he becomes more popular to the base of the GOP.
Mitt and Rick Santorum don’t understand this at all. They are afraid of being labeled as racists, not realizing that they will be so labeled BECAUSE THEY ARE CONSERVATIVES.
Santorum has no fear hitting Obama, I don’t know were you are getting that from Rich, but you are right about Newt he does take it to him as well.
Five months ago a Washington Post poll found that strong support for Mr. Obama in the Black community had shrunk below 60% and at least some support was about 86%. Perceptions of an improvement in the economy have probably moved these numbers up some, but overall your belief may be correct.
a “preception” only becomes your reality if you don’t have a personal reality that overrides it … in the case of the economy if you are among the 85 million Americans out of work or working part time your reality is that the economy is not improving …
all the preception in the world won’t make you think otherwise …
add to that 4-5-6 dollar gas in our near future and the Greece metdown this summer …
Obama is an ex-President walking …
[...] given Obama vast appeal, I submit even this reality would not stop Mitt Romney from winning the general election (barring [...]
The panic of Team Romney is pretty pathetic.