A little LBJ and a Lot of Panic for Obama

by Datechguy | February 28th, 2012

Readability

A little LBJ and a Lot of Panic for Obama

If you do EVERY­THING You’ll win

Lyn­don Johnson

Lyn­don Baines John­son only lost one elec­tion, that was a spe­cial elec­tion for Sen­ate in 1941. John­son cam­paigned hard and furi­ous, spent an incred­i­ble amount of money, used some bril­liant strat­egy and stole a fair amount of votes in cor­rupt coun­ties that his allies con­trolled, but as told by Robert Caro in the first vol­ume of his LBJ mag­num opus Lyn­don John­son the Path to Power, John­son made a rookie mis­take. He found him­self so con­fi­dent on elec­tion day that he gave per­mis­sion for some of the coun­ties he con­trolled to report results early. This telegraphed to the liqueur inter­ests des­per­ate to get Pappy O’Daniel (a pro­hi­bi­tion­ist) out of the Governor’s man­sion, the num­ber of votes they would need to steal in cor­rupt areas not con­trolled by John­son to win.

John­son would never let any­one out hus­tle or out steal him again. He ran his future elec­tions by his rule and would know only vic­tory from that point on until the pres­i­den­tial pri­maries of 1960. W

Which takes us to 2012

I have stated for quite a while that Obama is going to lose spec­tac­u­larly and that con­ser­v­a­tives should be con­fi­dent not wor­ried (ride right through them they’re demor­al­ized as hell and all that). In that spirit I was pleased to see Kevin Jackson’s lat­est post (buy his book) sug­gest­ing Obama is panicking.

There are rea­sons why he should be pan­icked but look­ing at his list I have to dis­agree with Kevin on an impor­tant point.

Sup­port­ing Super Pacs, launch­ing Span­ish Web Sites, the Truth Teams and shift­ing right are all pru­dent things. Obama needs the money to win, the Span­ish vote is very impor­tant (par­tic­u­larly after his dis of the Catholic church), the “Truth Teams” no mat­ter how much they back­fire are a log­i­cal tac­tic and shift­ing right will hurt him very lit­tle since the left assumes that any such pro­nounce­ments (such as oppo­si­tion to gay mar­riage) are lies for pub­lic consumption.

Assum­ing he has the recourse he claims the invest­ment in all these groups is wise, to quote a coach accused of run­ning up a foot­ball score

It’s not my job to stop me from scor­ing. It’s his,”

So none of those items in my mind con­sti­tute panic, they are instead a wise appli­ca­tion of LBJ’s elec­tion rule.

There is one item on his list that doesn’t just sug­gest panic, it screams it.

One might argue that Black Amer­i­cans might not be as moti­vated as they were in 2008. After all Obama’s re-​election would not be nearly as his­toric as his ini­tial elec­tion but even so the launch­ing of African American’s for Obama sends a very inter­est­ing signal.

If the black vote was his­tor­i­cally more evenly divided then form­ing such a group might seem pru­dent, but Democ­rats rou­tinely take nearly 90% or more of the black vote. If This pres­i­dent feels the need to form an “African Amer­i­cans for Obama” it is pretty telling.

Let’s do the math, Blacks make up 11% of the pop­u­la­tion. In 2004 Kerry took 88% of the black vote that accounted for 11% of the total vote. That 9.7% of the pop­u­lar vote for the demo­c­ra­tic can­di­date vs 1.3% for the GOP. A net 8.4% for the demo­c­ra­tic candidate.

In 2008 Pres­i­dent Obama took 96% of the black vote that con­sisted of 13% of the elec­torate, that adds up to in terms of the pop­u­lar vote.12.5 vs .5% for the GOP a net of 12% for the Democrats.

The dif­fer­ence between the two is a net 3.6% of the vote. Now in terms of The pop­u­lar vote 3.6% would still give Obama the edge if all things remain equal to 2008, but all things aren’t equal.

One can ratio­nally assume that even if this pres­i­dent is less pop­u­lar among the black com­mu­nity than he once was he would still eas­ily out­draw John Kerry among Black vot­ers. So lets say that the pres­i­dent gets 92% of the black vote this time 4 points bet­ter than Kerry but three points worse than last time and crunch the numbers.

If the black turnout is 11% the split is 10% Obama vs 1% Rom­neySan­to­rumGin­grich­Paul +9% for the dems
If the black turnout is 12% the split is 11% Obama vs 1% Rom­neySan­to­rumGin­grich­Paul +10% D
If the black turnout is 13% the split is 12% Obama vs 1% Rom­neySan­to­rumGin­grich­Paul +11% D

So Obama would nat­u­rally get a +9 to a +11 even if his pop­u­lar­ity drops with the black elec­torate by a full 3 points.

Or alter­na­tively if his pop­u­lar­ity doesn’t drop but the black turnout does, what are the numbers

If black turnout drops to 12% at 96% the split is 11.4% to .6% a dif­fer­ence of 10.8
If black turnout drops to 11% at 96% the split is 10.6% vs .4% a dif­fer­ence of 10.2
If black turnout drops to 10% (unlikely) at 96% the split is 9.6% vs .4% a dif­fer­ence of 9.2

Given these fig­ures and esti­mates at worst the black com­mu­nity will pro­vide a +9% for Obama and at Best +11 a dif­fer­ence on only 1 – 3 points of a vote that he won by 7.2 points.

Yet given these fig­ures the Obama admin­is­tra­tion finds the need to invest time and money in a “African-​Americans for Obama” orga­ni­za­tion where the return poten­tial return is from such a ven­ture is minis­cule sta­tis­ti­cally. That sug­gests one or both of the following:

1. Press reports about the weak­ness of the cur­rent GOP field not with­stand­ing the Obama admin­is­tra­tion under­stands the GOP is united in their dis­like of his poli­cies and their base, which was largely absent from John McCain’s cor­ner is highly moti­vated to turn out decreas­ing the over­all impact of the black vote.

2. The rumors of dis­sat­is­fac­tion of the black com­mu­nity with pres­i­dent Obama are not rumors but fact and even the pru­dent esti­mates I have given over­states his pop­u­lar­ity among African-​Americans requir­ing imme­di­ate action to moti­vate the unin­spired and pres­sure the waver­ing to make sure Black turnout doesn’t drop.

This means that for all the pro­pa­ganda dri­ven by the left the Obama admin­is­tra­tion knows it is in deep trou­ble and needs every vote it can per­suade, brow­beat, buy or steal to keep it in office after Jan 20th 2013.

I don’t know what it tells you but I know what it tells me:


Ride Right Through them, they’re demor­al­ized as Hell!

Sim­ply amazing

Update: Insta­lanche, thanks Glenn helps me toward that Mil­lionth hit for next month hopefully.

If you do EVERYTHING You’ll win

Lyndon Johnson

Lyndon Baines Johnson only lost one election, that was a special election for Senate in 1941. Johnson campaigned hard and furious, spent an incredible amount of money, used some brilliant strategy and stole a fair amount of votes in corrupt counties that his allies controlled, but as told by Robert Caro in the first volume of his LBJ magnum opus Lyndon Johnson the Path to Power, Johnson made a rookie mistake. He found himself so confident on election day that he gave permission for some of the counties he controlled to report results early. This telegraphed to the liqueur interests desperate to get Pappy O’Daniel (a prohibitionist) out of the Governor’s mansion, the number of votes they would need to steal in corrupt areas not controlled by Johnson to win.

Johnson would never let anyone out hustle or out steal him again. He ran his future elections by his rule and would know only victory from that point on until the presidential primaries of 1960. W

Which takes us to 2012…

I have stated for quite a while that Obama is going to lose spectacularly and that conservatives should be confident not worried (ride right through them they’re demoralized as hell and all that). In that spirit I was pleased to see Kevin Jackson’s latest post (buy his book) suggesting Obama is panicking.

There are reasons why he should be panicked but looking at his list I have to disagree with Kevin on an important point.

Supporting Super Pacs, launching Spanish Web Sites, the Truth Teams and shifting right are all prudent things. Obama needs the money to win, the Spanish vote is very important (particularly after his dis of the Catholic church), the “Truth Teams” no matter how much they backfire are a logical tactic and shifting right will hurt him very little since the left assumes that any such pronouncements (such as opposition to gay marriage) are lies for public consumption.

Assuming he has the recourse he claims the investment in all these groups is wise, to quote a coach accused of running up a football score

“It’s not my job to stop me from scoring. It’s his,”

So none of those items in my mind constitute panic, they are instead a wise application of LBJ’s election rule.

There is one item on his list that doesn’t just suggest panic, it screams it.

One might argue that Black Americans might not be as motivated as they were in 2008. After all Obama’s re-election would not be nearly as historic as his initial election but even so the launching of African American’s for Obama sends a very interesting signal.

If the black vote was historically more evenly divided then forming such a group might seem prudent, but Democrats routinely take nearly 90% or more of the black vote. If This president feels the need to form an “African Americans for Obama” it is pretty telling.

Let’s do the math, Blacks make up 11% of the population. In 2004 Kerry took 88% of the black vote that accounted for 11% of the total vote. That 9.7% of the popular vote for the democratic candidate vs 1.3% for the GOP. A net 8.4% for the democratic candidate.

In 2008 President Obama took 96% of the black vote that consisted of 13% of the electorate, that adds up to in terms of the popular vote.12.5 vs .5% for the GOP a net of 12% for the Democrats.

The difference between the two is a net 3.6% of the vote. Now in terms of The popular vote 3.6% would still give Obama the edge if all things remain equal to 2008, but all things aren’t equal.

One can rationally assume that even if this president is less popular among the black community than he once was he would still easily outdraw John Kerry among Black voters. So lets say that the president gets 92% of the black vote this time 4 points better than Kerry but three points worse than last time and crunch the numbers.

If the black turnout is 11% the split is 10% Obama vs 1% RomneySantorumGingrichPaul +9% for the dems
If the black turnout is 12% the split is 11% Obama vs 1% RomneySantorumGingrichPaul +10% D
If the black turnout is 13% the split is 12% Obama vs 1% RomneySantorumGingrichPaul +11% D

So Obama would naturally get a +9 to a +11 even if his popularity drops with the black electorate by a full 3 points.

Or alternatively if his popularity doesn’t drop but the black turnout does, what are the numbers

If black turnout drops to 12% at 96% the split is 11.4% to .6% a difference of 10.8
If black turnout drops to 11% at 96% the split is 10.6% vs .4% a difference of 10.2
If black turnout drops to 10% (unlikely) at 96% the split is 9.6% vs .4% a difference of 9.2

Given these figures and estimates at worst the black community will provide a +9% for Obama and at Best +11 a difference on only 1-3 points of a vote that he won by 7.2 points.

Yet given these figures the Obama administration finds the need to invest time and money in a “African-Americans for Obama” organization where the return potential return is from such a venture is miniscule statistically. That suggests one or both of the following:

1. Press reports about the weakness of the current GOP field not withstanding the Obama administration understands the GOP is united in their dislike of his policies and their base, which was largely absent from John McCain’s corner is highly motivated to turn out decreasing the overall impact of the black vote.

2. The rumors of dissatisfaction of the black community with president Obama are not rumors but fact and even the prudent estimates I have given overstates his popularity among African-Americans requiring immediate action to motivate the uninspired and pressure the wavering to make sure Black turnout doesn’t drop.

This means that for all the propaganda driven by the left the Obama administration knows it is in deep trouble and needs every vote it can persuade, browbeat, buy or steal to keep it in office after Jan 20th 2013.

I don’t know what it tells you but I know what it tells me:


Ride Right Through them, they’re demoralized as Hell!

Simply amazing

Update: Instalanche, thanks Glenn helps me toward that Millionth hit for next month hopefully.

DaTechGuy on DaRadio Saturday Noon EST. WBNW AM 1120 Concord WPLM 1390 Plymouth WESO 970 Southbridge, FTR Radio, the 405 Media

money matters 003

Get Cash for Your Pallets! 1-(800) 248-7543

aaron test

jeffrey’s

jeffrey’s

Buy Raspberry Ketone Here

American 023

Belanger Hardware 284 Water St · Fitchburg · (978) 342-2912

belanger 2

Try the Double Burger!

nashoba

Annie’s Book Stop of Worcester

Annies Book Stop of Worcester 001

Find Discounts at the Stores you Love

TOP STORES

pottery paintin place

pottery paintin place

The Navy Seals in their First Mission

The Navy Seals in their First Mission

Get yours for Kindle Here

Get yours for Kindle Here

Listen to your Granny

RWG

Bernard PC 774-322-6045

Bernard PC 774-322-6045

Support our favorite Charties

Chris Muir’s Day by Day

Read me at Examiner.com

Examiner badge2

Only 114 Million Hits to retirement!

Monthly Goal (Wage plus Writers) $1445

Olimometer 2.52

Most Innovative Blogger 2013

Most Innovative Blogger 2013

Tags

Help a Brother Knight of Mine who needs a hand