by Datechguy | October 16th, 2012
There has been a lot of back and forth about “Will Barack Obama Throw Hillary under the Bus over Benghazi?” or vice-versa this week .
It was quite a situation, If Obama threw Hillary under the bus would the Clintons work subrosa against him? (I maintain they already have been.) If Hillary threw Obama under the bus would the African-American community make her pay in 2016, it’s one thing for them to be pissed off at Obama, it’s quite another for some white lady to beat up on him.
What do you do? Well Hillary has threaded the needle in a way that accomplishes everything she needed to thus.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Monday tried to douse a political firestorm around the deadly assault on a U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya, saying she is responsible for the security of American diplomatic outposts.
“I take responsibility” for the protection of U.S. diplomats, Clinton said during a visit to Peru. But she said an investigation now under way will ultimately determine what happened in the attack that left four Americans dead.
The moment I heard this I had one thought: This is the move of a political master. Consider what this accomplishes:
Seemingly:
It is a statesman like move, going forward and not ducking responsibility in a way nobody has been willing to do.
In Reality:
It covers her, by taking responsibility it heads off all kinds of stories that might come up with a theme of finding fault. Why should congress investigate to pin blame when it’s already been accepted?
Seemingly:
It supports the president, by taking the blame she shields the first Black president both showing herself a good soldier to the party and most importantly to the black community.
In Reality:
It undermines Obama by making her look strong, and him look weak. He is now forced to make some kind of statement second as a response. It’s the 3 AM phone call with her answering while he goes to Vegas.
Seemingly:
It ends press coverage on what the Obama Administration should do next, blame assigned move on.
In Reality:
It doesn’t end coverage it changes it. What will the president do about this? It puts Obama in a box. Blame is assigned so what is the punishment? If Hillary is responsible does he ask for her resignation, does he fire her? With his electoral prospects already sinking he dare not do either, and God help him if she resigns on her own. It would be another example of her acting while he is paralyzed. It is the final act of Carterization of the president.
Seemingly:
It makes her vulnerable as every commentator on the right calls for her head in the hope of embarrassing Obama and taking her down a peg.
In Reality:
It gets her in good with the base of her party. I can see the fundraising e-mails now. “She’s taken responsibility and those nasty right wingers are piling on” This will coin money for her. That doesn’t even take into account how the press will react.
Seemingly:
It hurts her 2016 election prospects after all she is responsible for an attack on the US on the Anniversary of 9/11 no less.
In Reality:
Not only does this make her look presidential (Expect comparisons to JFK’s Bay of Pigs speech from the MSM) but it neutralizes her primary opponents on the subject, in fact for the second time in twelve years she will be able to paint herself as the victim of the irresponsibility of a man who should have known better.
Seemingly:
It hands President Romney a ready-made issue in 2016 to use.
In Reality:
It puts Romney in a box. Every president has foreign policy failures and Mitt will have his share. Imagine the debate answer: “President Romney is right. I was secretary of state during the Benghazi debacle and I took full responsibility for it. What I would like to know is when the president will take responsibility for (insert relevant issue here)”. It will put and keep Mitt on the defensive.
The Bottom line is forgetting all the national security and moral issues involved. Hillary has done the thing that most helps her in the long run while all the time managing to undermine her foes on both the left and the right in one fell swoop.
That doesn’t mean it wasn’t the right thing to do, it IS but as usual the right thing is generally the smart thing and this was the smartest thing anyone in this administration has done in a while.
This story may continue, but in terms of its negative impact there will be little if any on Hillary Clinton from this point on.
Simply amazing.
Update: Stacy Smithy gets it:
Why am I not a Presidential candidate? Because if I was Mitt, I’d be all: “I’d like to congratulate the President on his choice of Secretary of State. After the better part of four years, somebody in the Administration finally took responsibility the way leaders do, on one of those hopefully rare occasions when it involves confessing a shortcoming. In this case, one that involved the butchery of four Americans. Hopefully this President isn’t too old to learn something from all this. Better leaders plan so as to minimize these sorts of tragedies. Lesser men play the Casablanca card and locate a usual suspects for a round-up. How is Nakoula doing these days, Mr. President?”
Update 2: On Morning Joe Hillary Clinton compared to JFK. Think about it, in under 12 hours Hillary goes from: “The person responsible for a disaster” to JFK saying “defeat is an orphan”.
Today is day one of campaign 2016.
Update 3: Captain Ed Morrissey (he will always be Captain Ed to me) NAILS it:
It’s a jaw-dropping display of a leadership vacuum, which Hillary ended up having to fill herself. This is exactly what Hillary warned voters about in 2008. The contrast between her moment of leadership in this crisis and Obama’s lack of leadership since the very beginning of it will not help Obama make the case for another four years of buck-passing at the top, not even when Obama showed leadership on the Nicki Minaj-Mariah Carey feud.
And Stacy McCain spots an oversight on my part:
@datechguyblog In your Hillary item (thanks for link) you credit me, when it was @smitty_one_each who did that post.
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) October 16, 2012
Corrected and noted.


























Yep. New data has come to light. I called it: http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/18/hillarys-non-mea-culpa/#ixzz29enIrlJ5
Hmm…after Obama’s performance in the 2nd debate, do you still think it was smart for Hilary to take responsibility, esp.if she suffers no consequences? I mean, now that Obama has also very visibly “taken responsibility” too, it looks like a comedy of errors.
Yes
I smell a rat. Hillary wants 2016 and will throw Obummer unde the bus. Slow Joe is OUT within 3 months if BHO is re-immaculated. Hillary rides in for 2016. Same deals that made her SoS in 2008, only now she has the bitch had.
Sorry this debacle gains Hillary nothing up the evidence she is an incompetent bungler who was a willing water carrier of wishes to destroy America.
Of course this will play well with the members of Obama’s party.
“God help him if she resigns on her own. ”
I think she should. Expose ‘the fraud’ for what he truly is.
Good analysis.
[...] [...]
Interesting, but I have one area where I would take issue with your assessment. In the event of a Romney win and a Republican Congress, if an investigation goes forward and finds that the situation was a clusterfark of major proportions with incompetence at the top (as seems not unlikely at this juncture), it will be hung around her neck. A major millstone in 2016.
Shouldn’t she take “full irresponsibility?” That would be more accurate, however more damning. This is like “not guilt by reason of insanity” vs “guilty by reason of insanity.”
What does responsibility mean in this instance if she and others have no intention of holding her accountable for these deaths?
[...] Da Tech Guy is under the impression that Hillary, rather than being “thrown under the bus” has been [...]
WTF is wrong with you people. This is NOT “taking responsibility”. It’s just more stonewalling on behalf of Obama. “Taking responsibility” would have meant resigning on the spot, as any honorable person who truly believed she had caused four deaths would have done..
The woman has no principles…only ambition. Support her at your peril.
Ah Creeper you are talking reality reality but I’m talking political reality, two different things particularly to those who don’t pay attention and that’s who this announcement is for.
How does it look for an older white woman to be taking a bullet for the younger Black man? Does this make the President look stronger or weaker?
The Clintons don’t voluntarily go under the bus for anyone. It is kind of 3-dimentional chess, but taking the blame for something that should be the President’s responsibility has the look of loyalty but the side effect of making the President look weak and incompetent and someone who needs to be rescued by a female subordinate. This is one of the slickest moves ever.
I was so mad about the announcement that i forgot to give the clintons full credit for this…well played.
I like the analysis. It all makes sense. My first thought upon reading this morning that she had taken responsibility was that she knew she was in the soup anyway, so she might as well try and make herself look good. That she managed to knife Obama in the back while doing it is just icing.
At the very least she hasn’t hurt herself.
The only thing Hillary did was accept responsibility for an error in judgment. It may not have been her error but it was her department.
But she did not take any blame or responsibility for the cover-up.
People will forgive mistakes.
The Clintons choose their seeming “defeats” with even more care than their victories.
This move won’t touch her in any negative way. People know that O was golfing while Valerie and Axelrod were running the country. Even Dems know that O is feckless and Hillary is capitalizing on it by this emphasis.
One shrewd bitch.
Am I wrong in suspecting some Democrat Hillary fans might be finding themselves suddenly unmotivated to give money to POTUS, or even vote?
I see this more as a classic Clinton shiv move. She’s definitely sticking it to the Obama campaign with this one – and without blowback from the Dem party bigwigs. Don’t see it helping her for a 2016 bid. Taking responsibility for dead Americans doesn’t really spin into a good campaign ad in a general election, does it? I’m suspecting she and Bill have read the tea leaves and might decide to give 2016 a pass (barring a Romney debacle in his first term).
Looks more like a saving her legacy kind of move with a dollop of revenge on top. Again… classic Clintonian move.
Biden’s comments may have put her in a corner and forced this action, but she’s made the best politically of this. In addition to what DaTechGuy said, she has put a firewall between her “crime” and the “coverup.” And remember – It’s less about the crime than the coverup. Obama and Biden are on their own in the coverup disaster.
As a person who knows many people who work at State, I know that Hillary is the person most responsible as a decision such as this would never make it to the desk of the President.
She did the right thing. Their are enough people who understand how those are decisions are made and by whom.
They may end up firing the head of security as the real fall guy and Hillary will be given that much more clearance.
[...] Hillary Makes The Smartest Political Move of this Cycle » Da Tech Guy’s Blog [...]
[...] Makes The Smartest Political Move of this Cycle (h/t Doug [...]
A lot of what you say is true, but how do you explain her trying to do exactly the opposite just two days ago?
Hillary was forced to take the fall imho, this was brought about under duress: she’s clearly trying to close the topic for Obama when her own State Dept just said they ‘never’ believed Obama’s version of events, re. ‘protest’ and such
Kind of a sudden change, no? Note that Obama summoned her to the Oval Office just a couple hours after she released the initial statement, so they probably decided for her to make fall on her sword when she got to Peru, so as to avoid much of the US press for as long as possible.
jmho/speculation
A fair point Reaganite. I readily concede no blame would have been better than having to take blame, but I consider this analogous to welfare reform.
Bill Clinton was dragged kicking and screaming to it. It took the third time to get him to sign it, but once it was signed, he owned it and the media celebrated him for it.
I would suggest Hillary seeing ducking would not work looked at the situation and concluded this was the best long term move.
[...] http://datechguyblog.com/2012/10/16/hilary-makes-the-smartest-political-move-of-this-cycle/ note this next link is from before Hillary’s move http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2012/10/15/ap-big-issue-about-benghazi-about-quality-us-intelligence [...]
[...] DaTechGuy writes HRC made the smartest political move of this cycle: The moment I heard this I had one thought: This is the move of a political master. Consider what [...]
Hillary is a “big league” player. Obama is a minor league guy. But I don’t believe Hillary has salvaged her 2016 run by doing this. She’s toast.
VERY sharp analysis. I immediately sensed it was a mighty smart move, but have been searching for how to articulate that. Actually, I think I might memorize the various points here. and shamelessly pass them off as my own, to get girls. Hillary winning at Obama’s expense? Vooo-laaaaa-re….
“If Hillary is responsible does he ask for her resignation, does he fire her?”
HA! The same way he fired Ben Bernake by renominating him to run the fed? The same way he also fired Tim Geithner? The same way he fired Eric Holder?
Has she announced her resignation?
Yeah…that’s what I thought.
I agree. It was a smart move by Hillary.
Nail meet head! I am not sure Obama saw this coming. If he did and still let this go he and his campaign are in shambles they should have seen this.
[...] 1. Check back at 12:01 AM and discover why Hillary Clinton made the smartest political move of this election season tonight [...]