By: Pat Austin
SHREVEPORT – Let’s talk Common Core one more time. I don’t know why this is still an issue, why this is still a thing, why it still exists, but it does.
Many states have renamed it, but no matter what name you give it, it’s still Common Core, and it’s rotten.
Besides the constant barrage of standardized tests (in many cases at least once a month), students are also forced to endure a scripted curriculum, mind-numbing pre-prepared slides, and endless waves of graphic organizers, Cornell notes, and pages of non-fiction to endlessly annotate, day after day after day.
Do parents really know this is still going on? Do parents approve of this? Do parents consent to having their kids put under the pressure of fifteen standardized tests per semester (not counting the endless Cold Read Tasks, Extension Tasks, and other actual classroom tests)?
This massive over reach into America’s classrooms has robbed teachers of any innovation and creativity in the classroom. After years of Kagan strategies and Harry Wong strategies, now teachers are told that all kids learn the same, by the script, by the worksheet.
College professor, and former middle school teacher, John Spenser is an advocate for innovation in the classroom. He writes:
Now, I don’t see anything inherently wrong with boxed curriculum. After all, a great novel is essentially “boxed.” The issue is when institutions force teachers to use boxed curriculum in a lock-step way where they lack the permission to make it their own.
This district adopted the prescribed curriculum as a way to embrace “best practices in education.” And yet . . . the district also describes the needs to meet the demands of a “21st Century Learning” and “spark innovation.”
But here’s the thing: innovation requires you to step into the unknown. If we focus all of our attention on best practices and codify these ideas into tightly packaged curriculum, we will inevitably fail to experiment.
When teachers are required to use these scripted programs with fidelity, by the letter, all creativity is gone.
Kids are reading very little fiction these days and there’s a much heavier focus on non-fiction. In fact, in some districts the curriculum might include a novel, but only certain chapters. Novels are now called “Anchor Texts” and students read articles, or “informational texts” about the novel, and perhaps will read the Prologue and a couple of chapters of the novel.
This is absurd. When teachers are required to use these scripted programs with fidelity, by the letter, all creativity is gone.
Teachers quit loving their job, they lose their passion, because really a robot could read a script and pass out a worksheet.
This is what’s going on in many classrooms across America.
Some districts, thank goodness, have rebelled and refused to participate in this indoctrination nonsense. Some districts still believe that the teacher is the one who knows what the student needs because the teacher knows the student.
See, kids aren’t data. Kids aren’t test scores. They aren’t numbers. They’re kids. And it’s time school districts start remembering that.
Years of school letter grades and skewed teacher accountability programs have distracted us from the real goal – teaching kids not just how to take a test but how to be productive, compassionate, educated citizens.
Parents need to be involved and ask questions. Meet the teachers who spend most of the day with your kids. How often are your kids being tested? What’s the curriculum look like?
This needs to change and teachers need to reclaim their autonomy. We’re raising a generation of kids now who can annotate the heck out of an article on microbes but can’t tell you who Atticus Finch is or why he is important.
Pat Austin blogs at And So it Goes in Shreveport.